Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jul 16, 2025 2:08 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 3:12 pm
Posts: 199
Location: London
The only thing I wish is that they would take the wing tips of it, like in the flying pic. I think the Mk XIV looks better with clipped wings.

The scheme it wears, it has worn it since it returned to flight around 2002/03, so I don't believe it is geared towards the American market. It might be a reason they have left it in the scheme. Think the scheme is a favourite of the HFL team as their Mk XVI TD248 also wore the same scheme for a while.

here is a pic from airliners .net of the two together.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0733455/M/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:42 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
Chad Veich wrote:
Is authentic paint not considered when judging at Sun-N-Fun? I love the Spit so no disrespect intended, just wondering what the criteria is.

Chad,

The scheme is based on an RAF entry in the Blackpool Air races of 1947.

It was a Mk 21 of 41 Squadron fitted with a 'service trial' contra-prop.

The identity has been speculated. There were possibly two such aircraft so painted, one being a reserve aircraft.

PeterA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
Thanks for the info guys. I was aware that the scheme was based on the Mk 21 pictured in Peter's post. I was just wondering if authenticity of paint and markings played any role in judging at Sun-N-Fun.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 2:53 pm
Posts: 299
Location: UK
blurrkup wrote:
Think the scheme is a favourite of the HFL team as their Mk XVI TD248 also wore the same scheme for a while.

here is a pic from airliners .net of the two together.
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0733455/M/


It was Eddie Coventry who first went for the Silver and red scheme on TD248 when it was restored by the original Historic Flying team, from memory Clive Denney researched and applied the scheme in 1991.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:05 pm
Posts: 258
Location: Plano, TX
blurrkup wrote:
The only thing I wish is that they would take the wing tips of it, like in the flying pic.


You never know............. they may remove them after the damage it sustained at SnF.

Julian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:25 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
needle wrote:
blurrkup wrote:
The only thing I wish is that they would take the wing tips of it, like in the flying pic.


You never know............. they may remove them after the damage it sustained at SnF.

Julian


What damage? Don't tease.

By the way, this aircraft put on a nice aerobatic display on Friday (?) at Snf...

KB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:05 pm
Posts: 258
Location: Plano, TX
Quote:
What damage? Don't tease.

By the way, this aircraft put on a nice aerobatic display on Friday (?) at Snf...

KB


A golf cart had an argument with it on the warbird ramp, as it was parking after its display. The underside of the left wingtip panel metal was pierced for about a 9 to 12 inch jagged curve. The corner of the metal on the airleron was also bent (although I don't know if this happened at the same time). The aircraft made a quiet, straight-out departure the following day, presumably for repairs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:32 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
PeterA wrote:
Chad,

The scheme is based on an RAF entry in the Blackpool Air races of 1947.

It was a Mk 21 of 41 Squadron fitted with a 'service trial' contra-prop.

The identity has been speculated.

Peter,

Didn't you come up with a possible identity from a Russian publication a year or two back?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:51 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Hmmmm... Looks just like Dreadnought to me! :lol:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:05 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
Mike wrote:
PeterA wrote:
Chad,

The scheme is based on an RAF entry in the Blackpool Air races of 1947.

It was a Mk 21 of 41 Squadron fitted with a 'service trial' contra-prop.

The identity has been speculated.

Peter,

Didn't you come up with a possible identity from a Russian publication a year or two back?


Mike,

When a photo turned up of a new contra-prop 'service trial' camouflaged Mk 21 Spitfire, LA217/GO, and this had very short service with 41 Squadron, bracketing by a couple weeks either side of the Blackpool Air races, I was pretty sure we had finally cracked the serial. That a Russian magazine ran a side view of the 'Racer' with serial LA217 added more weight. It had recently been revealed that Russia had Blackpool fully mapped as a centre for regional government in the event of an invasion...I jest not.

I had already prepared a little article on this when a further shot of LA217 turned up taken post the races, with identical camouflage as the first but with code RAV-J and evidence of the previous code GO painted out. It couldn't have been the racer.

To add to the conundrum, yet a further photograph surfaced, a contra-prop Mk 21, silver with the red strip, natural polished cowlings and carrying the code EB-?, yes '?'. Although not carrying an RAF serial, shadowed under the paint was evidence of LA299/AV-H.

Whether this latter aircraft was subsequently further repainted for the race or three aircraft were assigned to the race has yet to be determined.

PeterA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:22 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
What's not been pointed out is that the scheme is NOT (as most ground observers assume) 'just' a red stripe, but intended to be seen from the air, where the red stripes on the top of the fuselage, wings and tailplane form a Cross of Lorraine, the squadron's insignia.

Image

The red strip is an 'extension' of the Squadron's allocated red bar marking around a fuselage roundel.

Insignia: "A double-armed cross, it originated from the Squadron's association with St Omer, France during World War I."

As bdk's spotted, there is a coincidental similarity to Dreadnought's colours in the fact of the red fuselage stripe being common, and in fact Dreadnought's scheme is based on the Hawker's demonstration Fury which was painted in this scheme.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 2:32 pm
Posts: 118
Location: Northants, UK
Hmmm... well there ain't a red strip on top of the fuselage...

Image

_________________
Awfully nice aeroplane piccies available


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:19 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
DamienB wrote:
Hmmm... well there ain't a red strip on top of the fuselage...

My mis-remembered item.

Cross stands as the raison d'etre.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 2:53 pm
Posts: 299
Location: UK
That was the story when TD248 was painted, seems logical to me, maybe the stripe was down the side as a compromise, other wise it would have been very thin over the top of the rudder.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:40 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Yak 11 Fan wrote:
other wise it would have been very thin over the top of the rudder.

:D

Story tracked to '47, in fact. It's a good few years ago the info was researched for Warbirds Worldwide, from which I was simply relying on memory.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group