Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 2:44 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 5:28 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Okay, I'll say this as simply and as clearly as possible:

1) The F-22 is completely worth any and all the $ we are spending on it.

2) Anyone who says that the F-15 and F-16 are plenty enough to maintain US air superiority for the next 20-30 years is not privvy to knowing the capabilities of currently-fielded aircraft such as the Su-27 carrying the PL-12 missile or the double-digit Russian SAMs currently for sale (S-300 and better). The threat is not EMERGING. The threat is HERE and flying with the Chinese Air Force TODAY.

I would seriously doubt the ability of the USAF to maintain air superiority/air dominance against a Flanker/PL-12 threat (e.g. China) with only our currently-fielded F-15 and F-16 fleets. I personally would feel very threatened flying the "newest" fighter in the USAF fleet (if you don't count the Raptor and Lightning) against the current crop of Russian SAMs, which are fielded in numerous countries as we speak.

Besides, what's the alternative? STOP building it, and then take ANOTHER 20 years to build its replacement? The F-22 SHOULD HAVE been operational in the early 1990s (the YF-22/YF-23 competition was in the late 1980s, folks). Instead we have waited 15 years because of tightening defense budgets. This would be like The P-51 being designed in 1939 and becoming operational in 1953.

Bottom line: Raptor is expensive, but it is a capability we need.

As an aside...anyone who thinks that Raptor is "taking food off the table" of other defense programs needs to take a look at the defense budget. That may have been true 5 years ago, it is NOT true today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:05 am 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:37 pm
Posts: 1197
I guess after proffesional consultation the problem is more dire than thought! It can be concluded that we need more of F-22's at all costs to protect the freedom loving people of the world from those who would ensnare us with their overbearing, corrupt, political thinking. I'm sure China would love for us to discontinue the F-135 and F-22 production. :lol:


Last edited by Broken-Wrench on Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:50 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Blue Hills of Virginia
Pretty sad that the politicians and military leaders of this country can convince the general public that we NEED new military platforms while the city of New Orleans still looks the same two years after the hurricane :cry: I wonder how much good could be done there in New Orleans if we were to spend the same amount on the recovery effort as is being spent on the USS George H.W.Bush??? :vom: :vom: :vom:

_________________
Earn my respect and never lose it.
Demand my respect and never gain it. -Me

...just another plane dreamer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:13 am 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:37 pm
Posts: 1197
:lol: Thats funny


Last edited by Broken-Wrench on Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 7:18 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Pretty impressive video

[url]http://www.kbvp.com/extreme-videos/f-22-raptor[[/url][/url]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 8:34 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
6trn4brn wrote:
Pretty sad that the politicians and military leaders of this country can convince the general public that we NEED new military platforms while the city of New Orleans still looks the same two years after the hurricane


The F-22 was concieved, designed, and "sold" 20 years before Katrina (reference the "Advanced Tactical Fighter", or ATF program).

The F-35 program was in the works 10 years prior to Katrina (reference the Joint Advanced Strike Technology, or JAST program).

Which "new" military platforms are you thinking of that are competing against funds to repair New Orleans?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 10:24 am 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:37 pm
Posts: 1197
Don't worry C-17s and and Blackhawks and other branch of the military were there in New Orleans to provide the needed airlift to save lives of many. The military airlift C-17s, C-141,s C-130,s transported many up to New England from the huricane raveged area. Many people were provided vouchers from the goverment and locals that build the engine for the F-22 collected and provided additonal funds. The local Casinos helped also and reportedly fed and provided drinks to many at the slot machines and roulete tables and which allowed victoms to rethink their situation in life.. Even Financial Planning was provided. I 'm just glad we were here with team raptor to help. :lol:


Last edited by Broken-Wrench on Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:20 am
Posts: 140
Location: New Richmond, WI
If the government is going to waste money at least its being wasted on airplanes! :spit2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 7:10 pm
Posts: 648
Location: tempe, az
Can't the F-15 and F-16 vs. SAMS inadequacies that Randy mentions be remedied by updating electronic countermeasures?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:10 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4527
Location: Dallas, TX
I think that's why the F-22 with it's stealth characteristics is needed - anything that has to be countered with ECM is vulnerable to being figured out - it's been happening ever since WW2 - you find out you're vulnerable to a new electronic system, you build something to jam it, and they figure it out and you have to find a new way to counter them - if you reduce all of the ECM because their electronic devises to see you, then you break the cycle! At least that's how I understand the theory...

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:59 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Randy Haskin wrote:
Okay, I'll say this as simply and as clearly as possible:

1) The F-22 is completely worth any and all the $ we are spending on it.

2) Anyone who says that the F-15 and F-16 are plenty enough to maintain US air superiority for the next 20-30 years is not privvy to knowing the capabilities of currently-fielded aircraft such as the Su-27 carrying the PL-12 missile or the double-digit Russian SAMs currently for sale (S-300 and better). The threat is not EMERGING. The threat is HERE and flying with the Chinese Air Force TODAY.

I would seriously doubt the ability of the USAF to maintain air superiority/air dominance against a Flanker/PL-12 threat (e.g. China) with only our currently-fielded F-15 and F-16 fleets. I personally would feel very threatened flying the "newest" fighter in the USAF fleet (if you don't count the Raptor and Lightning) against the current crop of Russian SAMs, which are fielded in numerous countries as we speak.

Besides, what's the alternative? STOP building it, and then take ANOTHER 20 years to build its replacement? The F-22 SHOULD HAVE been operational in the early 1990s (the YF-22/YF-23 competition was in the late 1980s, folks). Instead we have waited 15 years because of tightening defense budgets. This would be like The P-51 being designed in 1939 and becoming operational in 1953.

Bottom line: Raptor is expensive, but it is a capability we need.

As an aside...anyone who thinks that Raptor is "taking food off the table" of other defense programs needs to take a look at the defense budget. That may have been true 5 years ago, it is NOT true today.


That's all I need to hear. Case closed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:39 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
same here..... good enough for me too. thanks randy.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:49 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
Careful everyone, lets everyone be civil.

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:55 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 2049
Location: Meriden,Ct.
Is the F-22 going to be the last U.S. fighter with a seat?

Phil


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 6:58 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
so it's claimed!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 253 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group