Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jan 02, 2026 7:37 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:28 pm
Posts: 30
Location: San Diego Ca
Great work! I'd love to get a chance to visit sites like that in paradise. Keep up the outstanding work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:27 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Great detective work! 8)

It still is disheartening to see that stuff just lying around like empty beer cans.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 pm
Posts: 702
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Thanks for your help John. The information you were able to provide was incredibly useful. Interesting point about the nose turrets. Even little details like this go along way to help strengthen my findings.


Here are a few interesting points and questions I've got regarding these reports.


It appears that both of these aircraft were evacuated into Truk from Saipan in order to avoid the Typhoon, unfortunately to no avail. I wonder how many other PBM's were flown in or alt Truk during this storm. I still have yet to contact one person who claims two have seen two PBM wrecks off Moen many years ago.


Both aircraft are from the same Squadron. This could help me further confirm my theory if I can find more information on or an expert on VP-32.


Neither report confirms that the aircraft remains were subsequently abandoned. Is this common? Due to the extent of the damage described in the report on the first aircraft I wouldn't doubt the aircraft would be considered a write off. The second aircraft however didn't sound nearly as bad. Is this information possibly contained in one of the unreadable areas of both reports?


If an aircraft was unmanned (i.e moored) at the time of an incident, would a report be filed?

At this point I'm relying on you all to help me test these findings. The last thing I want to do is write a false history.

I'm sure I'll have more later but I have to go to work right now.

Thanks for your help in this.

_________________
Curtis Block

I've seen too many airplanes destroyed by the term "Static Restoration."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 pm
Posts: 702
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
It seems I have been a bit premature with my previous posts. It looks as though the report I associated with the wreck photographed by Mr. Voss, is incorrect. Stand by to stand by on this one .

On the other hand, I am now more certain, that the wreck I photographed is PBM-5E BuNo 84654

_________________
Curtis Block

I've seen too many airplanes destroyed by the term "Static Restoration."


Last edited by Curtis Block on Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:01 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 am
Posts: 1179
Location: Merchantville, NJ
My Dad was on Saipan in 46 & 47, and once told me about lashing Quonset huts down to 6x6s to prevent them blowing awat during a typhoon during the time.

Not sure if it was the same one tho, but of interest...

Robbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 12:09 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Great stuff Curtis.

Yes, it's frustrating to do a load of work, publish it and listen to the deafening silence...

But actually there's usually quite a few who read it and give a handclap; you just don't get to hear it!

Keep us posted.

Would the guy who runs the VP Navy website be able to help?

http://www.vpnavy.org/

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 pm
Posts: 702
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Actually VPNAVY is how I originally got in contact with John Voss.

http://www.vpnavy.org/mishaps_unknown.html

I sent off an update for this page but have yet to receive a reply.

_________________
Curtis Block

I've seen too many airplanes destroyed by the term "Static Restoration."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:31 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Curtis Block wrote:
Actually VPNAVY is how I originally got in contact with John Voss.

Well, I was right, just late. :lol: :oops:
Quote:
If an aircraft was unmanned (i.e moored) at the time of an incident, would a report be filed?

In Commonwealth use, and aircraft that was 'lost' for any reason would have the record card state what happened, and I'd expect there would be some kind of report unless the machine was just 'reduced to produce' or scrapped. Dunno about the USN though, but someone here must?

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:36 pm
Posts: 702
Location: Wherever I happen to be.
Well it looks as though the final verdict is in.

I've been working closely with Guy Robbins from Accident-Reports.com. Guy is the person who handles the Navy reports for the site. I would like to publicly thank Guy for all of the help he has provided for this project, his efforts have made all the difference. I would highly recommend their services to anyone seeking information on a a particular incident.

http://www.accident-report.com/


I have been informed by Mr. Robbins that no other reports are available concerning PBMs at Truk. He told me that a report would have been filed even if the aircraft was unmanned at the time of an incident. These are the only two reports.

Mr. Robbins also explained what I guess amounts to an aircraft condition grading system in each report.

The lowest possible "grade" (D) was given to PBM-5E BuNo 84654, suggesting that it was indeed written off as a result of the damage sustained in the landing accident.

The condition "grade" given to PBM-5E BuNo 84652 is not as bad (C). This backs up my earlier skepticism about whether the extent of the damage constituted the aircraft being written off and abandoned. At the bottom of the second page of the report however, there is a hand written paragraph; unfortunately, it is almost entirely unreadable. I've been looking at it for a while, as I feel it holds the conformation I have been seeking. Between Mr. Robbins and I, the best we can make out appears to be. "P.P.C. ....plane.....PBM....was unsafe and sinking....." Guy also had the thought that if Truk lacked adequate repair facilities, the aircraft may have ultimately been abandoned.

It is the opinion of Mr. Robbins and myself that these aircraft, PBM-5E BuNo 84654 and PBM-5E BuNo 84652, are the identities of the PBM wrecks at Truk.

Now if I could just get a good lead on the identity of the "Claude" in the Fujikawa. http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=143254&highlight=#143254
Hint, Hint. :wink:

Or how do you like a Mystery fast attack boat?

_________________
Curtis Block

I've seen too many airplanes destroyed by the term "Static Restoration."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group