Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Mar 23, 2026 10:47 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:36 pm
Posts: 654
Location: Scotland
It is a real pity that the Belle lost her original paint years ago. One of my main reasons for starting this thread was that I was a bit surprised when I saw the article about her in Flypast and she was being stripped. I am sure the very best will be done with her. If she still had any wartime markings I thought that something similar to the FAA Museums Corsair could be done. As Mustangdriver says though, there is a big difference between Flak Bait and the Corsair, which are preserved, and the Belle which was in need of restoration due to her post combat status history.
http://www.fleetairarm.com/exh1index.htm

_________________
If the first casualty of war is innocence, the second is sobriety - Hawkeye.
Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws - Plato.
Lies get halfway round the world before the truth has a chance to get it's pants on - Churchill
If you are going through he11 - keep going - Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 642
Wix hangar home of the day dreamers :roll: If you want warbirds to look war weary just open them up to the general public. I bet with in six months it would look worse than any 25 mission war vet :shock: I've always been amaized at the lack of respect most people have for things on display. I've seen grown adults hanging on machine guns, pitot tubes,they push and tug on anything that looks like it could brake off. Even in my own hangar I've had several people knock parts off that are in the process of being hung for fitting but not secure. A 70 year old knukle head tried doing a chin up on the lower engine cowling, it was secured to the upper cowl with a couple of pieces of safty wire needles to say hes not wecome back. I hear a lot of comments on how things should look after restoration but if your only experience is building models in your Moms basement you dont have a real clue. As far as Flack Bait going to the Air Force Museum is just more unfounded B.S.

Thanks Mike

_________________
IF YOU CAN FIND IT WE CAN FIX IT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:18 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:15 pm
Posts: 1401
Location: San Diego CA
I don't care if you decide to paint her metal flake purple, just save her from falling apart!

Sorry, but fresh paint tends to look factory fresh and that is that!

Keep up the good work over there, MD!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:21 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
6trn4brn wrote:
mustangdriver...I certainly hope you are speaking on behalf of the general when you say that if Flak Bait comes to NMUSAF it will NOT be shined up! Right off the top of my head, I can't think of many aircraft there that look right, due to their being too shiney!!!

Did I read here correctly that a Hollyweird (Hollywood) set designer was hired to do the awful lighting in the WW2 hangar? If the general can go to that length, why wouldn't he be able to make the Belle look more real by displaying her war-weary with some professional help? I know that I am not the only visitor to the NMUSAF that thinks the majority of aircraft on display just look overdone and too perfect. They are warbirds for pete's sake. To display the Belle all shined up and factory fresh looking seems like a dishonor to all of the maintenance and ground crews that got greasy and grimey working on the old girls back then.

Yes, do whatever is necessary to save her for future generations, but don't do it to the point that the kids of tomorrow just walk past her as she will be just another shiney glamour-puss with no personality!


Sorry you don't like the aircraft restred to factory fresh. THat is how we do it unless the aircraft is like the NASM P-38. Mike is correct in I have heard nothing about Flakbait coming to the museum. I have also heard zip about the Shoo Shoo Baby going to NASM from our camp. Do you like the way SHoo Shoo baby looks? Because that is the same standard the Belle is going to be restored to. I am on the opposite side of yo. I like the facotry fresh look for museum aircraft unless it is like the Corsair or B-26. Fake wathering is not cool. How in the world does restoring the aircraft to factory fresh dishonor anyone. What dishonored them was having it sit outside in Memphis for 60 years. Saving that aircraft and placing it in one of the world's best museums is a far cry from dishonoring anyone.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 4:12 pm
Posts: 6
6trn4brn wrote:
They are warbirds for pete's sake. To display the Belle all shined up and factory fresh looking seems like a dishonor to all of the maintenance and ground crews


That's rediculous. So if you have a friend or relative who had a '63 vette sitting outside in the back yard rotting away for 40 years and you refurb it to a pristine condition for them, they would feel dishonored? Sounds like you have a problem with the NMUSAF. If you don't like it, don't go.

Maybe for accuracy it'll have the ball turrett missing like in the movie :?

_________________
There is no kill like a guns kill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:39 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
That my friend is priceless. 8)

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:32 pm
Posts: 446
Location: NC
with all the interior restoration going on, will the public be allowed to go inside and appreciate all the hard work?

"period in time" restorations, as we called em in the car world are great, if you have enough there to start with. Its hard to recreate faded oily paint.

B

_________________
documenting restored B-17s and those undergoing restoration to flight:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
banndit wrote:
with all the interior restoration going on, will the public be allowed to go inside and appreciate all the hard work?

"period in time" restorations, as we called em in the car world are great, if you have enough there to start with. Its hard to recreate faded oily paint.

B


There may be a way to look into it, but you are not going to be allowed to crawl inside of it. Once again the public ruined that. There used to be more aircraft opened at the museum, and there also used to be open cockpit weekends for everyone, but people started beating up the aircraft, so it stopped.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:51 pm 
Quote:
What dishonored them was having it sit outside in Memphis for 60 years. Saving that aircraft and placing it in one of the world's best museums is a far cry from dishonoring anyone.


Very well said my friend, but be careful, "the public" didn't ruin it, the A-holes ruined it. I'm "the public" as well, and i didn't ruin anything .... :D :D :D , but I get your point .... :D :D :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:55 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I hear you man. What I mean is the same idiots that did all of that stupid stuff in those threads we had on here about the airshow nightmares. The people that go there to really enjoy the place are great.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:04 pm 
I'd like to add a couple of hundred posts to those threads, I have been turned off to airshows many times because of stupid things so many idiots do, I'm just so overwhelmed by such idiots .... UGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .... I can't go there ..... :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:50 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Blue Hills of Virginia
Looks like I ought to spend more time in here and less time at work :roll:

Don't even ask me about restoring a '63 cheVette! Gimme some real muscle wrapped in metal as it should be...say a Hemi Cuda :P Vettes are a dime a dozen...why would anyone waste their money restoring one?

Now, back on track. I certainly understand that preserving the Belle for future generations is a must! I saw what was happening to her in Memphis and often wondered why there was so little time spent taking care of her. When the Air Force took her back, I agree with so many of you in that was the best thing that could happen to her. I also understand that to just spray some preservative on her and put her on display as-is would have been rediculous. I WANT TO SEE HER RESTORED/PRESERVED FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS TO LOOK UPON! OK? Did I say that loud enough for ya'll to hear me??? My point being that to restore and display her in the same location as Shoo Shoo Shoo and in the same condition will not give her the honor that she deserves. And no, knowing that Shoo Shoo Shoo is a combat veteran, no I don't like the fact that she is all shined-up and pristine.

Once again, the general is gonna do what he thinks is right. Does not matter what any of us think or say. To open the Belle up to the general public to give her a war-weary look? That comment does not even deserve a reply!

Finally, I have been to NMUSAF no less than 15 times. The last time I was there, I wandered over to the far end of the memorial garden and found the Security Police monument. That my friend is why I will always take the time to visit the museum and will always spend a few moments honoring my fellow current and former members of the Air Force Security Police/Law Enforcement Groups. No-one will ever tell me to not visit the museum...at least to my face.

Peace.

_________________
Earn my respect and never lose it.
Demand my respect and never gain it. -Me

...just another plane dreamer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:18 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
So what are you suggesting we do, you are the head of restorations. Are you really suggesting that we weather the Belle like you would a model airplane? There is NO ORIGINAL WEATHERING LEFT ON THE AIRCRAFT. And if you do like the museum, then cut us some slack. With all due respect, I have not heard you say one nice thing about the place. I don't feel that painting fake weathering on the aircraft is honoring anyone. The history of the Belle and the rough life she has led, entitles her to a full ground up rebuild. I know that some have issues with the General and the museum. has he always done what is popular? No. but he does what he feels is right for the future of the aircraft. Our goal is to restore the aircraft, yes that means all shiny and new, unless it is a timecapsule aircraft, then of course we do what is needed to preserve it. That is not the case with the Belle

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 642
Hi Darrell the dreamer,

WTF if you spent a little more time doing a little research you would find that Shoo Shoo Shoo was a very derilect a/c that was modified in to a airliner configuration complete with large windows :roll: When found by the Air Force it had been wrecked, disassebled, gutted out and left to rot outside in a large pile. :shock: It was recovered, restored to flying condition and flown under its own power to Wright Pat and is on display for all to enjoy.That my friend is nothing short of increadable :wink: The amount of work required to bring this very neglected airframe back to life was amaizing. As far as all shined up goes I feel that the a/c in the museum are painted in much more authentic colors than most of the pimped out epoxy painted stuff you see at the air shows. They are painted in flat colors with an effort at correct markings ect. some of the flying a/c are more of a joke, personal initials as tail codes, bogus colors picked from an automotive color chart, nose art with their wifes name on it, the list goes on. Shoo Shoo Shoo was originally a natural metal B-17, do to the rough condition of the exterior skins the decision was made to paint her O.D. and gray :?

The Belle was abused and gutted by the same kind of idiots that we all love to see at airshows. Gee lets see if I can brake that off and take it home so that sooner or later mommy will make me throw it out. I'm surprised the Belle wasnt scrapped years ago, so many civic leaders are hell bent to get rid of what they see as eye sores. [The resent scrapping of an F-84 comes to mind] It was so gutted that only a ground up restoration would return it to a displayable condition. The staff at the museum do a great job at caring for these fragile artifacts, General Metcalf has more than tripled the a/c on display and has raised the level for all museums how is that a bad thing?

Its easy to compare apples and oranges, Chevetts to Hemi Cudas, shiney vs. weathered but the reality is what is your claim to fame? Are you restoring a B-36 in your basement? I'm sure if you are its a Monogram kit not a life size version of the coolest bomber built. If you would like to change the world as you see it shut off the computer, get invovled in the restoration world and dazzle us with your experteez I think Walters B-36 maybe available in the future lets see you do something with that, until then we will just have to suffer with the crappy job everyone else does. I hear a lot of complaints about the Air Force museum but you have to admit its the greatest collection of military aircraft on display in the world. With out their efforts most of these rare birds would be beer cans :shock: Post some shots of your work we would all love to see it :wink:

Thanks Mike

_________________
IF YOU CAN FIND IT WE CAN FIX IT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 642
Hi Darrell the dreamer,

WTF if you spent a little more time doing a little research you would find that Shoo Shoo Shoo was a very derilect a/c that was modified in to a airliner configuration complete with large windows :roll: When found by the Air Force it had been wrecked, disassebled, gutted out and left to rot outside in a large pile. :shock: It was recovered, restored to flying condition and flown under its own power to Wright Pat and is on display for all to enjoy.That my friend is nothing short of increadable :wink: The amount of work required to bring this very neglected airframe back to life was amaizing. As far as all shined up goes I feel that the a/c in the museum are painted in much more authentic colors than most of the pimped out epoxy painted stuff you see at the air shows. They are painted in flat colors with an effort at correct markings ect. some of the flying a/c are more of a joke, personal initials as tail codes, bogus colors picked from an automotive color chart, nose art with their wifes name on it, the list goes on. Shoo Shoo Shoo was originally a natural metal B-17, do to the rough condition of the exterior skins the decision was made to paint her O.D. and gray :?

The Belle was abused and gutted by the same kind of idiots that we all love to see at airshows. Gee lets see if I can brake that off and take it home so that sooner or later mommy will make me throw it out. I'm surprised the Belle wasnt scrapped years ago, so many civic leaders are hell bent to get rid of what they see as eye sores. [The resent scrapping of an F-84 comes to mind] It was so gutted that only a ground up restoration would return it to a displayable condition. The staff at the museum do a great job at caring for these fragile artifacts, General Metcalf has more than tripled the a/c on display and has raised the level for all museums how is that a bad thing?

Its easy to compare apples and oranges, Chevetts to Hemi Cudas, shiney vs. weathered but the reality is what is your claim to fame? Are you restoring a B-36 in your basement? I'm sure if you are its a Monogram kit not a life size version of the coolest bomber built. If you would like to change the world as you see it shut off the computer, get invovled in the restoration world and dazzle us with your experteez I think Walters B-36 maybe available in the future lets see you do something with that, until then we will just have to suffer with the crappy job everyone else does. I hear a lot of complaints about the Air Force museum but you have to admit its the greatest collection of military aircraft on display in the world. With out their efforts most of these rare birds would be beer cans :shock: Post some shots of your work we would all love to see it :wink:

Thanks Mike

_________________
IF YOU CAN FIND IT WE CAN FIX IT


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 131 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group