Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:39 am
Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:19 am
daveymac82c wrote:Hey Scott,
I really enjoyed your narrative about the check out. I was kind of surprised that you said it had similar flight characteristics as a B-25. I'm thinking to myself, "One's a bomber and one's a fighter, how can they fly so similar?"
none-the-less, I join everyone else in thanking you for posting your experience. And as much as I've never flown an extra, an F-15, or an F-4, I think I still got an idea of what you were talking about.
Cheers,
David
Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:04 pm
hsperdue wrote:
3) Again 120 is the magic number... but as far as flying the pattern is concerned if you are configured the airplane will not maintain level flight... below 500' you don't have enough altitude to attempt a go around... with Full Flap you are committed to land... don't screw it up.
hsperdue wrote:5) If you don't have the RPM matched then you are turning... on the ground or in the air... big engine, big prop... it's just physics, lot's of torque. The counter rotating props don't really make a SE situation that much better. As I remember the Piper Seminole has counter rotating props and you don't notice much difference in mis-matched RPM in that airplane.
Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:22 am
warbird1 wrote:hsperdue wrote:
3) Again 120 is the magic number... but as far as flying the pattern is concerned if you are configured the airplane will not maintain level flight... below 500' you don't have enough altitude to attempt a go around... with Full Flap you are committed to land... don't screw it up.
So, if I understand this correctly, here is what you are saying. Anytime the airplane is configured (i.e. gear and flaps), no matter what airspeed you have, the airplane will not be able to maintain level flight under any conditions, correct? Is this regardless of flap setting also?
What is the significance of the 500'? What is the final approach airspeed of the P-38? Are you saying that if you lose an engine above 500', you must push the nose over and trade altitude for airspeed to pick up your magic 120? Is this the intent of the 500'? Please explain.hsperdue wrote:5) If you don't have the RPM matched then you are turning... on the ground or in the air... big engine, big prop... it's just physics, lot's of torque. The counter rotating props don't really make a SE situation that much better. As I remember the Piper Seminole has counter rotating props and you don't notice much difference in mis-matched RPM in that airplane.
Excuse my ignorance here. Even though I have a multi-engine rating, I've never flown multi's with props, only jets. Are you saying that unless you have the RPM's exactly matched, that you still have some amount of torque?
More questions:
1) Also, can you explain about the combat flaps on the P-38? Are these the regular flaps, or some other flaps, external on the wing? Are there any P-38's flying with those?
2) If you do lose an engine on takeoff and you make the decision to go and take it in the air, are there any considerations about your ability to raise the gear with a dead engine? I'm assuming the gear is hydraulically activated? How is the hydraulic pump on the P-38? Is it tied to an operating engine? Would it be possible that you might not be able to raise the gear, single-engine, in a "go" mode? Would the gear raise slower than normal, if this were the case?
3) What is the Dash One limit on the number of G's you can pull on the -38?
Thanks again for taking the time to answer these, this discussion is MOST fascinating to me!
Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:15 am
Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:42 am
CH2Tdriver wrote:quote "There is a 'Dive Recovery Flap' which was installed on late model J's and the L model... Ruff Stuff will soon be the only one flying with Dive Flaps. " end quote
Scott or anyone can answer this one;
On the Jeff Ethel Roaring Glory DVD on the P-38, during the pre-flight he demonstrates the deployment of a 'triangular' looking device on the wing bottom that he mentions was used to get out of a high speed dive. Is that what is being mentioned here?
(I guess that was the Tillamook example which is probabably considered non-airworthy at present?)
Pete
Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:04 pm
hsperdue wrote:warbird1 wrote:
2) The gear is indeed hydraulic, lose an engine not a problem... there is even a handpump... lots and lots of strokes though to cycle the gear.
gunny
Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:50 pm
51fixer wrote:CH2Tdriver wrote:quote "There is a 'Dive Recovery Flap' which was installed on late model J's and the L model... Ruff Stuff will soon be the only one flying with Dive Flaps. " end quote
Scott or anyone can answer this one;
On the Jeff Ethel Roaring Glory DVD on the P-38, during the pre-flight he demonstrates the deployment of a 'triangular' looking device on the wing bottom that he mentions was used to get out of a high speed dive. Is that what is being mentioned here?
(I guess that was the Tillamook example which is probabably considered non-airworthy at present?)
Pete
That is the dive recovery flap. Developed because the P-38 had a nasty habit of being difficult to pull out of dives.
Rich
Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:51 pm
marine air wrote:Hello Gunny,
Congratulations on your recent accomplishment! "Luck is opportunity met with preparation." You certainly have a tremendous background. A couple of questions;
1) When you did part of the checkride in the Baron, was that to demonstrate IFR proficiency, or just the engine out type manuevers?
2) Do you have any limitations on your P-38 type? and what are they?
The reason why I ask is because I got my P-51 and T-28 LOA's several years ago, and a few years after that, when the FAA reissued my certificate, it had VFR limitations on these two even though I was IFR rated. IFR was not part of the curriculum at the time of the checkrides.
You may not ever want to fly the P-38 in IFR conditions but it's irritating on my license that one of these days I will have to pay a lot of money to do another checkride, maybe at Stallion 51 or wherever to get this restriction removed.
Semper Fi,
"Marine Air"
Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:30 pm
Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:49 am
hsperdue wrote:2) The gear is indeed hydraulic, lose an engine not a problem... there is even a handpump... lots and lots of strokes though to cycle the gear.
Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:26 am
warbird1 wrote:hsperdue wrote:2) The gear is indeed hydraulic, lose an engine not a problem... there is even a handpump... lots and lots of strokes though to cycle the gear.
Gunny, awesome info, thanks a lot! But some more questions/clarifications:
I'm still confused on the above quote. So, if you lose an engine on initial takeoff, do you have to do anything different to raise the gear? Are you saying the handpump is needed in this situation or is it just for a total hydraulic failure?
Also:
1) Were any of the flaps on the P-38, whether combat, manuevering, or dive recovery - fully automatic? In other words, would any of those come out without the pilot activating any kind of control in the cockpit? Or do they all require manual activation?
2) If you have to do a manual bail-out, what are the chances of hitting the empanage section? I've always wondered how hard it would be to bail-out in between the tailbooms and horizontal stab.
3) For the surviving, flying P-38's, when you take passengers for a ride, what is the little space like behind the pilot? I've never seen a picture of how that setup is. I've heard that it's some kind of shelf, or platform, but is there an actual seat there? Does it even have a seatbelt? Has anyone done anything in that space for passenger accomodations, or is it just a "sit at your own risk with no seatbelt" kind of settup?
4) What is the redline airspeed of the P-38?
5) For your checkout in the P-38, was your initial solo considered your checkride, or did you get a few "waivered" solo flights prior to the checkride? When you did fly the P-38 on both the solo and checkride, did anyone fly formation with you in a chase position? How do they do checkrides in single cockpit airplanes?
6) How did you get the opportunity to be allowed to check out in the P-38? Do you have friends or connections with the owner of "Ruff Stuff"?
Gunny, I know you're probably tired of answering my numerous questions, but I'm almost done!
Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:18 am
hsperdue wrote:
Hydraulic- you don't need to do anything differently... pull the gear handle up... the Hyd system is a low pressure system with pumps on both engines, the hand pump will work in normal or emergency, but it is only used if the pumps fail...
-Flaps are all manual, landing/maneuver and Dive
-I know that 23 Skidoo can take folks up for a 'Buddy Ride'... you sit behind the pilot on the shelf, no seat, small seat belt, no space, bent over.. I almost did it, wasn't actually looking forward to it.. airplane problem prevented it. GG and Ruff Stuff have no provisions for a rider, I don't know about the other one, or the Old Putt Putt Maru (being redone at Stallion 51), I've seen the Red Bull 38 and see no provisions for a rider.
Hope this helps,
gunny
Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:36 pm
51fixer wrote:Many P-38's were built with the generator and hyd pump only being on the L/H engine. That was your critical engine cause you would lose electrical and hyd if you had to shut that engine down. The POF model had them installed on both engines during the restoration.