How does this warbird photo rate? bad or good taste?

[Jack Cook]

I've never heard of telephoto compression very cool!!!
I learned something on wix today.

[tom d. friedman]

Not harsh at all. I'm just pointing out that a majority of threads started by this person seemed to be designed to invoke controversy just for the sake of it. Here he's implying that this is a reckless act and why ask if it's in bad taste? Seems to be trying to stir the pot is all I'm saying.

skybolt, i certainly hope you are not referring to me!!

[JBrawner]

well if the date is right on the photo there wasnt an issue with how close they actually were. being the last B-25 in the formation that day i got to see it all and they had enough distance in fact from the ground picture it looks way closer then i remember seeing it... and no i dont have a picture i was observer during the flight and didnt have time to scan the sky and get a picture as well.

[skybolt2003]

skybolt, i certainly hope you are not referring to me!!

Absolutely not. I apologize for not making that clearer when using your quoted text. I agree with you, it's an interesting picture - but certainly not a controversial one.

[Dan K]

Well, here's how it looked with my point-n-click as I was making for the exit.

[fotobass]

Not harsh at all. I'm just pointing out that a majority of threads started by this person seemed to be designed to invoke controversy just for the sake of it. Here he's implying that this is a reckless act and why ask if it's in bad taste? Seems to be trying to stir the pot is all I'm saying.

From his original post...

Does this show reckless flying or does the angle of the photo compress severely the distance between the 2 bomber as 1 overflies the other?

It read to me like he really didn't know.

Sorry if it seemed like I jumped on you. I just see several folks who drop a hammer on this guy when he posts, and I don't see the point. I figure that, if there's someone whose threads I don't like, I don't have to read them.