Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:41 pm
Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:55 pm
Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:14 pm
kenlyco wrote:I agree the STOL version is going to be a nightmare,but thats the capabilities the Marines wanted.I was a little shocked when Lockheed got the contract, seeing they just won the f22 years before that, It was close must have been political?
Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:36 pm
Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:48 pm
kenlyco wrote:What are you smoking,this is one badass looking bird!!
Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:19 am
Sasquatch wrote:True...like the A-6 Intruder, F-8 Crusader and A-7 Corsair II...all sailor scooperuppers. Best negative comment I heard about the jet was that the Pentagon insiders derisively called it the "Monica Lewinski". I still liked it better than the F-35, especially in the VSTOL version. That version of the F-35 will be hauling around an extra jet engine, something the Boeing doesn't need to do.
--Tom
from Phil Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:27 am
Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:10 pm
St. Louis lost the contract twice. Once as McDonnell Douglas and later as Boeing. My understanding was that the performance of the Boeing model was good and it was the first to fly, but that it missed the mark as far as the mechanical configuration which was little more than an improved Harrier type design. The Lockheed entry used a lift fan design. Some also say that the uglier plane never wins a competition.kenlyco wrote:I was a little shocked when Lockheed got the contract, seeing they just won the f22 years before that, It was close must have been political?
Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:17 pm