Speedy wrote:
12XU2A3X3 wrote:
i dunno what i always thought that. i mean i get that it's nearly twenty year old paint. but even when it left MARC/YestAF/whatever it still looked bad. the colors were wrong. did they re-paint it the same scheme, which was light, an aleutian scheme, something like that?
Not criticizing, just observing...but I've seen more than one of the restorations that Tallichet's group did which had horrible quality paint jobs on them. The B-26 is one. The P-38 that was done in the early 1990's is another. I saw an air-to-air photo of it just a couple years after it was purchased at the Museum of Flying auction and the paint was literally peeling off of it in sheets. No excuse for that.
The Tallichet group was not exactly known for putting out quality, award-winning restorations. Years ago, a friend of mine who was a P-51 owner, told me that Tallichet was getting into "hot water" with the FAA because of the quality or lack thereof of the maintenance program that he had in place for most of his collection. Supposedly Tallichet did not want to put the extra money or effort into the maintenance program and as a result starting selling off some of his collection. This is the reason that many of his warbirds ended up being sold with the prime examples being the B-26 and B-24.
Can anyone verify or add any additional information to this story that I heard?