Invader26 wrote:
I was taught that if you have an engine problem stay high and set up your approach to aim for around 1/3 of the way down the runway as the touchdown zone. If it goes wrong on approach you've built in some fat...
Pretty sure everyone that is trained in T-28 or other high performance aircraft is taught the same thing. However, as I was not able to determine from the video what altitude or distance from the airport he was when the incident occurred I can not say he did or did not follow that same principle.
Invader26 wrote:
T28Mike:
If you read a couple of comments they were not talking about the actual event but rather, as is normal on such public occasions, to make general observations.
As a matter of fact I owned and flew my T-28D for around ten years.....
She is a drag bag in the landing configuration. The normal clean best glide speed is 130KIAS.....a landing somewhere "under the nose" from low altitude is generally assured.
I'm glad all ended well for the two guys. [Interestingly, Natops manual calls for canopy open during landing.]
Obviously not applicable here.
There were several comments about this incident and 'how he handled it'.
None of us were in the drivers seat, so we do not know what happened, other than the crew went for an impromptu underwater egress refresher course.
I have been restoring, flying and maintaining T-28's and many other warbirds for 27 plus years. While that gives me a better perspective, it does not make me any more knowledgeable of how things transpired in this situation. It is only speculation.
I agree that the -28 is a high drag elevator ride to the landing spot, every pilot should commit 130kts to memory.
Yes, NATOPS procedure regarding the canopy may not exactly have been not followed.