Jigs Bumper wrote:
Hello Scott, a funny story the recollections from the Jolly Roger's....
The point I was trying to share, was during the crucial planning and execution of gathering up ALL the material and equipment needed to recover the B-29 Kee Bird, the people running the show decided, allegedly, that a pallet of beer was more of a priority than counting up the fire extinguishers and making sure they had more than enough in the event of an unforeseen catastrophe. They were operating far out from any other point of civilisation. The flights in by a STOL ship, I think a De Havilland Caribou??? needed to use every single once of available space, and available fuel to fly the supply flights, to maximise the requirements of the project. I think it was mentioned more than once, how much it was costing to mount the recovery so every penny being sponsored for the recovery needed to be used wisely.... so, like I said before, I was really saddened, and yes angered, to see the plane go up in smoke from what was a small and containable fire initially, all because they didnt have extinguishers...no extinguishers... but cans of beer. A very short sighted piece of planning. Weighing it all up, beer? or, Extinguishers? I would have said the tightness of the budget and, knowing they were far from any help if something went wrong, they really should have made the latter choice and loaded one of those supply flights with a pallet of extinguishers, and left the beer back home till they had succeeded in flying Kee Bird out and to safety.
I hope any other similar recovery attempts that are made from inaccessible places of the world, will take such things into account. I'd hate to see a repeat of the '29 Kee Bird all over again.
Ian
Thanks for the compliment, and I AGREE entirely with your reasoning about beer vs. fire protection equipment. (Maybe the beer was the carrot on the stick for the mechanics...lol...) BUT THEY SHOULDA THOUGHT ABOUT THE POSSABILITY OF FIRE!
Scott