Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 4:25 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:11 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Were it not for the caveat 'used after the war" I would put forward the Ju.88

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 372
Location: Canada
Dan Johnson II wrote:
You name it and the Beau did it from the beginning of the war to the end.

...Including donating her pre-engineered firewall forward package to the Lancaster to speed up development IIRC. That has to count for something, right?

-Tim

_________________
Keep 'em Flying.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 6:16 pm
Posts: 195
The Douglas A-26 Invader must be high up the food chain. 16 forward facing .50 cals does plenty of talking.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 12:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:26 am
Posts: 327
Location: Alberta, Canada
Ok I'n going start off by admitting I am heavily biased...

Every morning as I walk to my office I have to pass under the nose of a FB Mossie. Yep with 4 .303s and 4 20mm. Even has "Hairless Joe" on the nose.

So for me given the criteria it has to be the Mossie.
- Day/Night bomber
- Intruder
- Day/Night fighter
- Coastal command (some with a 57mm?/6lber? Cannon as I recall)
- Rockets, bombs

RAF, RAAF, RCAF, RNZAF, USAAF and others

Served in Europe and SEA then carried on into the postwar some into the 50s/60s with the Swiss? if I remember correctly.

And the sound.......nothing like it.

Plus becasue of the press from it's missions...romantic.
Movies...633 Sqn and the odd other added to the romance
Books like "Terror in the Starboard seat" did nothing but help the cause.

Helps my office is beside the 418 "City of Edmonton' Squadron mini museum in our facility.

Ahhhhh the Mossie

Tom

_________________
Alberta Aviation Museum
Edmonton Aviation Heritage Society


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 7:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 12:05 pm
Posts: 393
Location: 'old' Hampshire, England
old iron wrote:
Quote:
Was Dornier's Do 335 considered the fastest piston twin in production (from a production of what--maybe a dozen?)?


Others might beg to differ, but I would say that Do.335 never reached full production. Most if not all of the circa 25 aircraft built would count as prototypes and pre-production; if some were to be counted as "production" they were so few that the type could not be considered a major enough design for comparisons being made here. None were ever used offensively in combat, though a few were seen in flight by Allied aircraft.

I think it was 10 production aircraft completed, but none ever entered operational service.
It wasn't the fastest either as the speeds quoted were without any military equipment fitted, the DH Hornet was only a couple of MPH slower at full operational weight.

_________________
Martin
Wide open & turning left.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2011 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 166
B-25s. They :D must be in there some where.

_________________
When you meet a Veteran shake his or her hand and thank them, they earned your freedom.
I plan to fly in as many B-25 as possible be fore I die! B-25 for ever!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 25, 2011 1:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:33 am
Posts: 474
as much as i'd like to say the westland whirlwind....it wasnt :cry:
both the mossie and beaufighter could be up there and there are few others...a20,b25 and of course the b26 marauder :supz: .
the the axis side the bf110 series and follow ups and the he111 series and ju88 have to be up there as well along with the ki46,and j1n gekko.
but i think the twin of the war like someone else has said is the c47...it was even named as one of the biggest influences on winning the war..and as a side it also served on all sides of the war :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:14 pm
Posts: 466
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Most manufactured: Soviet Pe-2

Most air-to-air kills: P-38

Fastest: Me262

Longest served (and arguably most loved): C-47

Most cost-effective: Mossie

Most versatile: Ju-88

_________________
What is red, furry and on your six?
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 11:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 5:14 pm
Posts: 365
fritzthefox wrote:
Fastest: Me262

Doesn't count.....OP specified 'piston'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:14 pm
Posts: 466
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Well, I guess Dornier wins that one with the Pfiel, then...although the Twin Mustang had flown as a prototype before war's end.

_________________
What is red, furry and on your six?
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:45 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1120
Location: Caribou, Maine
Quote:
Most air-to-air kills: P-38


I am going to still guess that the Me110 had more kills than the P-38. It was used in many theaters in early part of the war and in both day and night. Can anybody bring in some numbers for comparison so we can then argue whether the Americans or Germans were more prone to making overclaims?

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:26 am
Posts: 152
old iron wrote:
Quote:
Most air-to-air kills: P-38


I am going to still guess that the Me110 had more kills than the P-38. It was used in many theaters in early part of the war and in both day and night. Can anybody bring in some numbers for comparison so we can then argue whether the Americans or Germans were more prone to making overclaims?


I would make a bet that you are correct that the 110 had more kills than the P-38, but I would also make a bet that the Germans made many more claims with the 110 vs Americans with the P-38. I'm also wondering if the Mossie was really more cost effective than other similar twin engine aircraft.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:38 am
Posts: 144
Location: Ferndale, WA
fritzthefox wrote:
Most manufactured: Soviet Pe-2
Most air-to-air kills: P-38
Fastest: Me262
Longest served (and arguably most loved): C-47
Most cost-effective: Mossie
Most versatile: Ju-88


You forgot "most sexy: P-61 Black Widow"

_________________
StudeDave


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 5:15 pm
Posts: 167
Location: Georgetown Tx
Although being biased towards the Beaufighter and Mossie, the Me410 packed quite a punch too, does anyone know what sort of kill ratio it had or was it mostly designated as ground attack. I think it was only Eastern and Western Fronts so not much for every theatre....

Simon

_________________
"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 6:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:11 pm
Posts: 187
Location: port hope ontario canada
ok maybe i,m a little biased here but i think the p61 black widow was the best looking of its time with the b-25 Mitchell coming in a close second , didn,t the canon nosed version of the Mitchell sink an awful lot of shipping in the pacific theater?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], phil65 and 289 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group