Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:41 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:14 pm 
RickH wrote:
And there's more Kudzu growing there now !


Rick, I remember the idea didn't pan out for cost and maybe other reasons for the 2011 Centennial, but if someone is willing to pay for the paint and repaint and maybe another donation to Collings, I would think the repainting of the F-4D to a 1960's F-4B would not be rejected completely out of hand. Add in some of the existing flying A-4's, a few more CGI F-4B's, F-8's, etc. and we have a movie.

:wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
As one who got my commission and went to flight school in the wake of Top Gun, I can say first hand that it spawned an entire generation of disillusioned SNA's. Not only can you not drive your crotch-rocket motorcycle along the inside perimeter fence at sundown during flight ops at Miramar, but NOBODY goes to the O-Club dressed in their whites--Summer or Dress--to pick up chicks, none of the instructors ANYWHERE in the pipeline looked like Kelly McGillis's worst day on their best day, and that is NOT what beach volleyball looks like amongst Navy flight crews. Those dreams were crushed by reality. But it was too late to get my money back from the theaters.

And as for the suggestion to paint up the Collings Foundation jets and fill in the rest with CGI...you chumps are barking up the wrong tree. To do it RIGHT, Top Gun II would need to be made up of random 'file footage' from the Vietnam war, a'la "Midway", with no continuity or accuracy.

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 1131
Location: Cambridge, New Zealand
When I joined the RNZAF in 1989, the question was asked by an instructor around every member of my Flight at General Service Training School as to what had prompted them to join the RNZAF. Around 3/4 of them said Top Gun, and it turned out they'd all tried to get in as knuck pilots and not passed the entry, so joined as groundcrew trades like me. I was not one of them who said Top Gun, I joined because I genuinely had loved aeroplanes all my life.

_________________
The Wings Over New Zealand Forum http://rnzaf.proboards.com

The Wings Over New Zealand Show http://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz/WONZ_Show.html

Wings Over Cambridge http://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 605
Location: West Hammond, Illinois, USA
PbyCat-Guy wrote:
I hope another Top Gun is NOT made, it was one of the worst movies ever made.



Amen. Top Gun and Pearl Harbor are tied for worst aviation movies ever made. Both are horrible.

_________________
.
.
.

"Welcome back Mr. Lasky."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:53 pm 
TonyM wrote:
PbyCat-Guy wrote:
I hope another Top Gun is NOT made, it was one of the worst movies ever made.



Amen. Top Gun and Pearl Harbor are tied for worst aviation movies ever made. Both are horrible.


I don't think it would be too hard to find worse aviation movies when you look at everything that came out from the 30's through today, but I would at least give a little credit to Top Gun for some nice aerial photography of watching F-14's, A-4's, etc. in action. Storyline - not too much you can say about that.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
jwc50 wrote:
TonyM wrote:
PbyCat-Guy wrote:
I hope another Top Gun is NOT made, it was one of the worst movies ever made.



Amen. Top Gun and Pearl Harbor are tied for worst aviation movies ever made. Both are horrible.


I don't think it would be too hard to find worse aviation movies when you look at everything that came out from the 30's through today, but I would at least give a little credit to Top Gun for some nice aerial photography of watching F-14's, A-4's, etc. in action. Storyline - not too much you can say about that.


It was a movie made for entertaining the average public, not a documentary for educating fighter pilots.

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:09 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
Speedy wrote:
...To do it RIGHT, Top Gun II would need to be made up of random 'file footage' from the Vietnam war, a'la "Midway", with no continuity or accuracy.


What? You mean we didn't have angled-deck carriers in 1942? Let's not forget the land based Marine P-40s.

I always like to go through and pick out the scenes that were borrowed from "Tora Tora Tora". The worst is when the Japanese are bombing Midway and you can clearly see the mainmast of a U.S. Battleship.

The first time I saw the movie as a kid, it was on NBC and shown over two nights with additional footage of Coral Sea added in. I drove my father nuts by pointing out all the inaccuracies in the live action and the random "file footage". These days, I probably would have been diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome if I tried that.


Last edited by SaxMan on Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:11 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
Speedy wrote:
none of the instructors ANYWHERE in the pipeline looked like Kelly McGillis's worst day on their best day,



are you sure?

Image

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
muddyboots wrote:
Speedy wrote:
none of the instructors ANYWHERE in the pipeline looked like Kelly McGillis's worst day on their best day,



are you sure?

Image


LOL....yup. Still sure! :shock:

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:35 pm 
Online
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:49 pm
Posts: 2164
Location: West Lafayette, Ind.
Quote:

It was a movie made for entertaining the average public, not a documentary for educating fighter pilots.


+1. I hope I'm never as grumpy and cynical as some of you guys are. Sheesh. :roll:

_________________
Matt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:38 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Two whole pages and not one mention of a more recent El Stinkeroo- Memphis Belle.
I always wondered how 'Mav' could ride his bike on base without a helmet--------

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:19 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Pacific Northwest USA, via North Florida
I never understood Top Gun haters. I loved the movie when it came out. You check your brain at the door and enjoy that awesome air-to-air filming that nobody has been able to re-create (and forget about improving on it), 25 years later!
RickH wrote:
Paint is cheap !
But service pride isn't. Anyone who's ever served will tell you that there's no way the USAF would allow one of their aircraft to be painted as a USN one without one heck of a fight. That kind of demand would have to come from on high by the prince of darkness himself before any blue suiter would let that happen.
SaxMan wrote:
p51 wrote:
You'd need at least one flying (taxiing one, at the very least) F-4 in USN colors.
Or you could just CGI the ones you need...(ducking for cover)

No, you'd still need one (or least most of the front end of one) real F-4 for people to climb onto showing them getting in. Even Red Tails had more than one real Mustang on the set.

_________________
Life member, 91st BG Memorial Association
Owner, 1944 Willys MB #366014
Former REMF (US Army, O3)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:04 pm 
deleted


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:11 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Quote:
Anyone who's ever served will tell you that there's no way the USAF would allow one of their aircraft


I say screw'em ! First, it aint their aircraft, and Second; we can paint it any color we want !

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Top Gun II
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:24 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Speedy wrote:
...not a documentary for educating fighter pilots.

I wasn't aware educating fighter pilots was possible.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kalamazookid, mike furline and 294 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group