Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 5:50 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 7:44 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
This is a rather neat bit of woodwork.

Image

And, while obviously a wing section, it's also rather unusual as it is a foreplane, and as you'd expect in this thread, was the one built for the Boxkite.

One of the things that makes the Boxkite very unusual is the pitch control with this foreplane and an elevator, and the fact that, as well as the wings, it has a forward lifting surface (the controllable foreplane) and a (biplane) lifting-surface tail unit. Adds a little interest to lift calculations, I'm sure.

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 9:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 372
Location: Canada
JDK wrote:
The second thing to note is that the front of the aircraft is to the left, and thus the rotary is hanging off the BACK of the propeller - even more removed from the airframe than your standard tractor-type rotary. We've not found a reliable reference as to why it has this configuration, but an obvious possibility is that the slipstream is desired / required to cool the engine; something there would be far less of if the prop were aft of the metal. Anyone know better?

I'm not an expert but I do like pictures from the dawn of flight. It seems to me like most (maybe all?) of the early Gnome rotaries had the prop on the airframe side of the engine. That is to say, tractor mounted Gnomes had the propeller behind the engine. I've always suspected they worried about any small propeller imbalance bending the crank.

-Tim

_________________
Keep 'em Flying.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 9:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Got me there Tim; I'm struggling to think of one production or number-produced period type tractor with a prop aft of the engine. (I'm not thinking of all the weird and wonderful didn't fly or just flews) Can you elucidate?

We should also remember the Boxkite was a production type made in substantial numbers (for the era) and Bristol were licensees for the production Gnome - again, for the era, a robust and effective engine.

Image

there's a page here, which has a list of types which used it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnome_Omega

It's certainly exercising the grey matter!

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:03 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
And here's some advice for Boxkite pilots of the period (1910s) that is relevant today, but not normally put in these exact terms...

"Always remember that it is not difficult to fly, you need "pluck" and coolness, take plenty of time to do everything and do not overdo it. The personal danger is very small as long as you do the right thing at the right time."

Trust all our aviators are using their 'pluck' and 'coolness' today and everyday...

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:35 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Image

The Boxkite project at the RAAF Museum had many genuinely interested visitors today, Sunday 2nd March, eminent among whom was Her Excellency the Honourable Ms Quentin Bryce AC, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia. Seen here with Group Captain Ron Gretton AM RAAF (Ret'd) on the left, and Wing Commander Geoff Matthews, RAAF (Ret'd) the builders of this remarkable, airworthy replica of Australia's first military aircraft.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 7:34 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Image

Two natty-dress chaps. Front is Lieutenant Eric Harrison, the pilot of the first flight of the Australian military Boxkite on 1 March 1914. Here he is in the original Boxkite CFS 3 with Brigadier General John Gordon on 5 March 1914. Gordon was the Chief of General Staff at the time, and one of several early VIP passengers to fly from the new 'federal aviation station' at Point Cook, as The Age called it. [RAAF Museum Archive image]

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 11:58 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Tiger Tim wrote:
It seems to me like most (maybe all?) of the early Gnome rotaries had the prop on the airframe side of the engine. That is to say, tractor mounted Gnomes had the propeller behind the engine. I've always suspected they worried about any small propeller imbalance bending the crank.

I've seen the comment about "many propeller behind on the Gnome tractors being produced" repeated on the internet, but I've not seen photographic or written evidence of that practice. In the following link is this photo which has been credited to the Seguin Brothers Gnome display at the 1st Paris Aeronautical Salon at the Grand Palais during December 1908. Presented on a Bleriot 11 chassis it is later attributed as going to sportsman Leon Delagrange...
http://www.uh.edu/engines/gnomerotaryenginephoto.jpg

The second photo of this link shows it's arrival at the meet at Doncaster UK in October 1909....
http://www.thefirstairraces.net/meeting ... planes.php


I've read through 1909 thru 1910 of backissues of the UK's "Flight" as well as the 1908-10 years of the French publication L'Aerophile and have not seen one photo or written account of another aircraft using that configuration.


Welcome back James!

EDIT

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], JimH, phil65 and 250 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group