Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jul 14, 2025 1:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:19 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Not enough time in the day to get heavy into this discussion.
Paints were changed at periods of the war. I've done a bit of research on this in regards to early war paint as the SNJ-3 was built in Dec of 41.
I have a Dupont Aircraft Paint book from 1943. No color cards but some interesting info including silver paint mixture info.
I have a 44 Hayes T/W O/H manual with other silver paint info.
Also found an article from 42 Industrial Paint Magazine with a revised paint formula for AN-TT-P-465 Yellow Zinc. I believe it was a Oct revision from a previous August revision.
Also found an article on the primer and paint processes used by Douglas in the 42 timeframe.

Zinc Chromates were applied by spray, dip and flow. Flow being out of a hose. Seen film of that at the Piper factory when primering the fuselages of cubs. Frame hangs over a pool and operator holds a 1/2" hose or so and lets it dribble onto each tube of the frame. Not to pretty.

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 5:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
51fixer wrote:
Not enough time in the day to get heavy into this discussion.
Paints were changed at periods of the war. I've done a bit of research on this in regards to early war paint as the SNJ-3 was built in Dec of 41.
I have a Dupont Aircraft Paint book from 1943. No color cards but some interesting info including silver paint mixture info.
I have a 44 Hayes T/W O/H manual with other silver paint info.
Also found an article from 42 Industrial Paint Magazine with a revised paint formula for AN-TT-P-465 Yellow Zinc. I believe it was a Oct revision from a previous August revision.
Also found an article on the primer and paint processes used by Douglas in the 42 timeframe.

Zinc Chromates were applied by spray, dip and flow. Flow being out of a hose. Seen film of that at the Piper factory when primering the fuselages of cubs. Frame hangs over a pool and operator holds a 1/2" hose or so and lets it dribble onto each tube of the frame. Not to pretty.

At Douglas they were also coating Aluminum sheets when sheets were arriving by running through a series of machines and rollers that cleaned, etched with acid based cleaner and applied the zinc by a roller as wide as the sheet while passing through. After drying time it was flipped and ran through for the other side. So roller was another method.

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2350
Location: Minnesota
In response to the post about invasion stripes on restored warbirds often/always being too precise...starting back in May, ahead of the 70th Anniversary of D-Day, and likely for the extent of at least this air show season, a few UK-based Spitfires received water-based (as per original) invasion stripes, done with brush and wobbly lines. Here's a quote that I thought lent well to this thread, from the Key Forum member Roobarb, who is a Duxford-based warbird restorer and expert painter, in regards to painting these specific invasion stripes in such a manner as shown below: "It's amazing how difficult it was to re-create a rough/authentic look without it looking child-like. One has to strike the fine balance between re-creating history and respecting the fact it is a multi-million pound precious Spitfire belonging to someone that isn't you."

MH434:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dwhitworth/14166715271/

ML407:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dwhitworth/14239302995/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/16239637@N05/14074978817/

PV202:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nickj1972 ... qWY-nCBS7w


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:07 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
Regarding invasion stripes I have often wondered: They were used for months after the invasion. Was there time then to paint them accurately using masking tape and paper as well as more permanent paints? What about aircraft delivered to reception centers in the UK where they would have had their tactical markings and theater specific equipment installed. Were invasion stripes still painted on in a slapdash way there?

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:31 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
John Dupre wrote:
Regarding invasion stripes I have often wondered: They were used for months after the invasion. Was there time then to paint them accurately using masking tape and paper as well as more permanent paints? What about aircraft delivered to reception centers in the UK where they would have had their tactical markings and theater specific equipment installed. Were invasion stripes still painted on in a slapdash way there?



It's possible that aircraft delivered to reception areas between 5JUN44 and 7AUG44 may have had more care in painting, but the paint was still to be temporary in nature.
From 7AUG44 to 6DEC44 aircraft were to be marked only on the underside. Again, perhaps more care, but still crap paint. Topside markings started to be removed in the field in the beginning of August. Removing the temporary paint often left stains*, or worn spots in the pre-existing paint.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
When I think of "real-looking" warbird finishes, one of the best I've seen is the Skyraider Naked Fanny. It's an ex-French AD-4NA, and thus never wore USAF SEA camo in service, but it certainly does look the part!

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group