Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 3:08 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2018 8:30 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Dan K wrote:
Randy, all I can say is that Mudge the Cunning Linguist would've been proud. :wink:


hehe, I consider that quite the honor. :)

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:10 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 1048
Location: Whittier CA USA, 25 miles east of Los Angeles
At Airsho 86 they were still having problems with it- and got in the air for one flight late in the afternoon. It looked so cool- I told myself get a good look this may be the one and only time - it was. Yes I’ve often said that crash took out the most experienced Marauder pilots in the world and anyone can get into trouble no matter how good. Was really devastated by it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2018 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:02 pm
Posts: 302
Well, I knew nothing of any of this before I asked.
I'm saddened to read the reports and hear the stories; it qualifies as a real tragedy.
My improved knowledge of the English language, though, is a good thing, at least for me.
And my thanks to those willing to explain!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2018 11:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:48 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: West Valley, Silicon Valley
I found this on the interweb. I hope Randy is okay with me posting this. :|

Quote:
10/2/95
The following is the official news release on the loss of
the CAF's Martin B-26 "Carolyn" on 28 Sep 95.

**********

Barbi Woods, Public Relations Coordinator, CAF

For Immediate Release
NR# 95-0928

At 10:56 a.m., Sept. 28, 1995, the Confederate Air Force's
B-26 Marauder (N5546N) "Carolyn" crashed approximately 18
miles south of Midland International Airport. Five crew
members perished in the accident. The crew members were:
Walter A. Wootton, Harlingen, Texas; John Thomas Cloyd,
El Paso, Texas; Vernon E. Thorp, Ocala, Fla; Colin Dunwell,
Surrey, England, UK; and Chris Gardner, Essex, England, UK.
Two of the CAF's most experienced pilots, Thorp and Wootton,
were flying the airplane. The National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) is investigating the cause of the
accident.

The B-26 Marauder is a twin-engine World War II aircraft.
Prior to the accident, the CAF's B-26 was the only flying
Marauder in the world. Manufactured by the Glenn L. Martin
Company, Omaha, Nebraska, the B-26 was delivered to the USAAF
on May 24, 1943. It served at various stations throughout
the United States until April, 1945 at which time it was
transferred to the Defense Plant Corporation, Bush Field,
Georgia, and was dropped from USAAF inventory.

During its civilian life the B-26 "Carolyn" performed varied
missions. It was used as a racer and flew under the name
"Valley Turtle." It was then converted into an executive ship
by the Tennessee Gas Corporation. The CAF bought the aircraft
in 1968 from a bank in Greeley, Colo. Restoration began in
1976 and the aircraft did not fly again until Sept. 11,
1984. Following AIRSHO 95 the plane was to be moved to its
new homebase on the East Coast.

AIRSHO 95, planned to take place Sept. 29 through Oct. 1 at
Midland International, will proceed as scheduled. The
AIRSHO, which is the homecoming show for CAF members, will
be dedicated to the crew members aboard the B-26.

********** End of News Release **********

I am posting this on Monday, after the air show is over.
The air show was dedicated to the five who lost their lives
on the B-26, and appropriate "Missing Man" and other
tributes were performed. Services were held for Tom Cloyd
in Midland this morning.

As a warbird pilot and historian, who had the chance to be
around "Carolyn" quite a bit, and who knew and visited with
all five of the crew in the days before the accident, I
suggest that we all wait for the results of the NTSB
investigation before we try to "guess", even intelligently,
what really happened. Thank you.

Randy Wilson
Colonel, CAF
Aviation Historian & Pilot

P.S. I was authorized by Barbi Woods to post this release,
however the comments are my own, and I do not speak for the
CAF in this matter.

_________________
remember the Oogahonk!
old school enthusiast of Civiltary Warbirds and Air Racers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 871
Location: Midland, Texas
Lon - no problems.

Randy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:40 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2308
Should never have allowed passengers on that flight. Knew both of them.

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:50 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
ZRX61 wrote:
Should never have allowed passengers on that flight. Knew both of them.


How would it have been any different on any other flight?

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:13 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
If he had intended to practice stalls and steep turns (as was reported in the accident finding) then he shouldn't have had passengers. Most insurance companies and operating instructions specifically prohibit the carriage of non-essential crew on flights where stalls are being performed. I'm pretty sure the CAF's current regulations are the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 936
Location: Deer Park, NY
From reading the NTSB report, I'm guessing that the cause of the power interruption to both engines was never determined?

Did this happen out over a practice area or at the airport? (I ask because the report states stall/spin but TBM Tony mentions seeing it slide down the runway)

Thanks.

IIRC '95-'96 was a bad period of time for war birds. In addition to the loss of Carolyn, we lost the only airworthy Heinkel, Mossie, and there was the P-38 Lightning crash at Duxford as well. There were others I'm not recalling at the moment. It just seemed that every time I got a copy of a warbird mag during that time, it featured a warbird loss. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:15 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
CAPFlyer wrote:
If he had intended to practice stalls and steep turns (as was reported in the accident finding) then he shouldn't have had passengers. Most insurance companies and operating instructions specifically prohibit the carriage of non-essential crew on flights where stalls are being performed. I'm pretty sure the CAF's current regulations are the same.


All that notwithstanding, as I asked, how would it have been on any other flight?

As the performance of the stalls and steep turns, and the presence of passengers, had nothing whatsoever to do with the accident that occurred, I'm still confused by the statement.

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 871
Location: Midland, Texas
CH2Tdriver wrote:
From reading the NTSB report, I'm guessing that the cause of the power interruption to both engines was never determined?

Did this happen out over a practice area or at the airport? (I ask because the report states stall/spin but TBM Tony mentions seeing it slide down the runway)

Thanks.

IIRC '95-'96 was a bad period of time for war birds. In addition to the loss of Carolyn, we lost the only airworthy Heinkel, Mossie, and there was the P-38 Lightning crash at Duxford as well. There were others I'm not recalling at the moment. It just seemed that every time I got a copy of a warbird mag during that time, it featured a warbird loss. :(


They are talking about two different incidents and accidents involving the B-26. One where the nosewheel collapsed on landing in 1985 and the other where the plane crashed on a checkride to requalify one pilot and qualify another in 1995. The checkride would have required engine out procedures and other slow speed flight conditions. If you reread the entire thread hopefully that will make it clearer. Just one point to add if you are not familiar with the Odessa/Midland area of West Texas, the ground here is about 2900 feet above sea level. The altitudes that the plane was reported to be doing these maneuvers is MSL not AGL. These are my personal comments and I don't speak for anyone else, including the CAF. Hope that helps but that's about my last comment on the accident.

Randy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:11 am
Posts: 210
Location: COMFORTABLY NUMB
I note from the Registry that as of 2004, 40-1459 was being restored to airworthy status, is this still the case and if so, is it near completion?

_________________
...and pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in Space cos there's bugger all down here on Earth!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:33 pm
Posts: 434
CH2Tdriver wrote:
IIRC '95-'96 was a bad period of time for war birds. In addition to the loss of Carolyn, we lost the only airworthy Heinkel, Mossie, and there was the P-38 Lightning crash at Duxford as well. There were others I'm not recalling at the moment. It just seemed that every time I got a copy of a warbird mag during that time, it featured a warbird loss. :(


The Heinkel crashed in 2003...I remember it well as I was just getting ready to head off to college and that was devastating news.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:45 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7818
Always a pain in the *ss (generally) when people don't bother to read a thread from the beginning before posting. Causes pissing matches here all the time. :evil:
The loss of the CAF's B-26 was sad, the loss of the folks involved was tragic.

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The old CAF B-26 ...
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 3:55 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:16 am
Posts: 2308
Randy Haskin wrote:
CAPFlyer wrote:
If he had intended to practice stalls and steep turns (as was reported in the accident finding) then he shouldn't have had passengers. Most insurance companies and operating instructions specifically prohibit the carriage of non-essential crew on flights where stalls are being performed. I'm pretty sure the CAF's current regulations are the same.


All that notwithstanding, as I asked, how would it have been on any other flight?

As the performance of the stalls and steep turns, and the presence of passengers, had nothing whatsoever to do with the accident that occurred, I'm still confused by the statement.


I didn't say the passengers had anything to do with the crash. I said they shouldn't have been on the flight. It was check ride for both pilots & neither of them had much time in the B26 in the previous year (not withstanding the hours they had in anything else). Go get current, then offer flights.

_________________
Those who possess real knowledge are rare.

Those who can set that knowledge into motion in the physical world are rarer still.

The few who possess real knowledge and can set it into motion of their own hands are the rarest of all.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 299 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group