Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 16, 2026 2:28 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:09 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11332
Wing corrosion AD:

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_an ... light=a-26

Typical aging aircraft problem I would think.

Spar cracking AD:

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_an ... light=a-26

Quote:
To prevent loss of wing structural integrity due to failure of a lower spar cap, accomplish the following:

A. Within ten (10) hours time in service after the effective date of this AD, perform a visual dye penetrant inspection of the lower forward and aft spar cap, outboard and inboard of each nacelle in the area where the nacelle fairing upper edge runs across the lower spar cap surface. Trim the fairing edge if necessary, to ensure that the fairing edge is smooth and that there is a minimum of one-sixteenth inch (1/16") clearance between the fairing and spar cap surface.

B. If no cracking or fretting of the spar cap is detected, repeat the inspection for cracks, surface clearance, and condition in accordance with Paragraph A. of this AD at intervals not to exceed 500 hours time in service.

C. If any evidence of cracking or fretting is found in the spar caps, polish out to a machine finish not to exceed approximately 125 microinches on both sides of the damaged area to a maximum depth of 0.030 inches and repeat the inspection of Paragraph A., above. Continue to inspect in accordance with Paragraph A. at intervals not to exceed 30 hours time in service.

D. If cracking or fretting in excess of 0.030 inches in a spar cap is detected, repair in a manner approved by the Manager, Western Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, Hawthorne, California.

E. For those aircraft which have been modified to incorporate a steel or titanium lower front spar cap strap (in the area where the nacelle fairing upper edge is in contact with the lower wing surface) in accordance with AD 64-12-03, the requirements of Paragraph A. of this AD are applicable only to the lower aft spar cap, outboard and inboard of each nacelle.

F. Within 72 hours after performing the inspections required by Paragraph A., above, report the results of the inspections to the Manager, Western Aircraft Certification Office, ANM-170W, FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, 15000 Aviation Blvd., Hawthorne, California. Mailing address: P.O. Box 92007, Worldway Postal Center, Los Angeles, California 90009. The reports should cite the airplane registration and serial number, crack location and extent of damage, total airplane operating hours, and time since last inspection.

G. Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate airplanes to a base for the accomplishment of inspections required by this AD.

H. Alternate inspections, modifications, or other actions which provide an acceptable level of safety may be used when approved by the Manager, Western Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Northwest Mountain Region, Hawthorne, California.

This amendment becomes effective April 16, 1985, and it was effective earlier to all recipients of priority mail AD 84-15-02, issued August 1, 1984.


That is basically a design flaw (on an aircraft never expected to be in service for so long).

INSERT SOAPBOX:

There is no connection between a high wing loading and structural fatigue.

Wing loading is the wing area divided by the weight of the aircraft. Aircraft with high wing loading tend to have shorter wings which reduces bending moment on the wings. Support yourself on some parallel bars at your elbows with your arms straight out. Then try again with wider parallel bars supporting yourself at your wrists. It is much harder with longer "wings."

Metal fatigue is dependant on:

a) Stress (force/cross sectional area or pounds per square inch) which is a function of the design and the flight conditions which result in loads

b) Load cycles (vibration)- typically gust loads on larger aircraft or how many times you perform an aerobatic maneuver

Fatigue curves plot stress vs. cycles to failure. A low stress level takes many more cycles to accumulate the same damage as a high stress level would.

Image

Airliners and transports have very low G-load limits. Fatigue damage is usually accumulated due to gust loads (turbulence) over a long period of time or in the case of pressurized aircraft, the number of pressure cycles on the fuselage. Large aircraft on the receiving end of aerial refueling accumulate fatigue damage very quickly. So do fire bombers which operate in a low level (dense air) gusty environment.

The fatigue failures on the ACM T-34 fleet were caused by only a few cycles of excessive load (over-G). If you look at the "Yield strength" line (about 100,000 psi nominal stress) on the graph, that is where the metal deforms (bends) permanently. Between 100 and 1000 cycles the yield strength line intersects the curve. If you operate at that (over) stress level you can see it doesn't take many cycles over 50 years to result in a fatigue failure. Add corrosion and other damage to the mix and you are operating on borrowed time. Operate that same aircraft with a stress level of 75,000 psi and you can do that maneuver 10,000 times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A-26
PostPosted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 1182
Location: Tulsa, OK
I talked to Mark Clark at Courtesy about the aircraft in question. He said that he had actually flown the aircraft the last time that it was in the air, but that at this point it would take major dollars (100,000's) to get it back to airworthy. His opinion was that it was probably an ideal possibility for a smaller museum that would like to have a static aircraft for display. There are a bunch of parts that come with the plane that could be used to mock it back up to an approximation of a WWII era A-26, though not perfect. Of course, as with most of these types of projects, it's all about time and money...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: A-26
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 12:17 am
Posts: 741
Location: Burleson, Tx
Hey guys. Tulsaboy, since you are in that neck of the woods with A-26's all around you, are you with the SH Group? Or, Dan Lawson and the Lady Liberty group? On the A-26 for sale, I guess the question is, once again. how badly do you want to make it fly. At the end of this post will be a link to a previous thread discussing new spars. They have been manufactured (Boeing) and are available for purchase. The SH Group are moving forward with their A-26 and have been able to keep costs down. Incidently, of the three CAF A-26's, only the Lady Liberty is still in its true bomber configuration. She was not an executive conversion. Alan
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... 51&start=0

_________________
Just call me Al.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:33 am 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
Sounds like maybe there needs to be an A-26 Co-Op group like there is for the B-17s. Try and pool some restores together to keep operating and or restoration cost down.

I love the A-26, what a beautiful aircraft. I also keep hearing what a great flier it is, it truly is a shame that so few are flying (or at least on the airshow circuit). I can almost understand Harpoons rotting away on the edges of airfields (I still hate to see it) but A-26s? That truly boggles my mind.

Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:42 pm
Posts: 162
Location: Reno, Nevada
Did'nt Wally MacDonald operate a couple of K's out of Mojave in the 70's? I have a slightly blurred picture of one taxiing in at a Travis AFB show in SEA markings with tip tanks and rocket rails.
As I remember he lost one when a prop reversed causing him to lose the gear and tear it fairly well. Pictures in an old Air Classics, I'm thinking 76, 77, 78 ish?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:19 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Wally operated A-26C 44-35696 under contract to the RCAF for downward firing ejection seat tests.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:14 pm
Posts: 1681
Location: Oslo, NORWAY
leo wrote:
Did'nt Wally MacDonald operate a couple of K's out of Mojave in the 70's? I have a slightly blurred picture of one taxiing in at a Travis AFB show in SEA markings with tip tanks and rocket rails.

Wally McDonnell did indeed operate several of the B-26K's that ended up in civilian street. The only one which he didn't have was N4988N owned by Denny Lynch. The ones with McDonnell were:

64-17640 N2294B Now at Ellsworth AFB, SD. Appearently made a forced landing in Wyoming while being ferried to Ellsworth!

64-17657 N99218 Crashed on landing Chino, CA Feb. 9, 1978. Cockpit section sold to Rod & Rex Cadman in the UK. Later displayed at Booker, UK. Then supposedly to Hull Aero in Norfolk. Has it moved on???
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0694647/L/

64-17676 N29939 Now at USAFM, OH. Flew and raced all silver as "The Mojave Kid".
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0239452/L/

Note in the photo of N29939 at the USAFM it is mistakenly labelled as 44-35733.
leo wrote:
As I remember he lost one when a prop reversed causing him to lose the gear and tear it fairly well. Pictures in an old Air Classics, I'm thinking 76, 77, 78 ish?

As noted above N99218 did come down on landing at Chino. As for the reason for the crash, the jury is still out on the subject of a mechanical failure, or "finger trouble" on the part of the pilot! It is seen wearing a glass nose, possibly put on the a/c after the nose gear collapsed on landing at Edwards AFB in 1975.

T J

_________________
Make my day, punk!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 1:30 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Did 44-35326 N401Y sell?.........I don't see it list on Courtesy's website anymore.

Thanks

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 642
HI,

Wally Mcdonald had 2 K models I remember seeing one of the shortly after one prop went into reverse on final right over the numbers at chino with devastating results. Scratch one A26-K :roll: This maybe the other one as far as being released by the military anybody know the facts?

Thanks Mike

_________________
IF YOU CAN FIND IT WE CAN FIX IT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 3:18 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:45 pm
Posts: 1095
Location: Kimberley, B. C. Canada
Here's the one Wally raced -- I always thought this was the one he rolled up at Chino??

Why did the Air Force not want the -Ks in civilian hands? What happened to them (or at least the ones that didn't stay in S. E. Asia)? How did Wally get his hands on them?

An old friend who did a couple of tours in Nam as a F-100 crew chief expressed some doubts about the Lynch airplane when we saw it at Hamilton AFB in the '80s because he thought the cowlings wrong for a -K model. As you can see here the cowlings on these -Ks are indeed different, but it seems to me that both cowling types can be seen in the -26 population as a whole. Any thoughts?

Image

Image

_________________
Neal Nurmi

---Wingman Photo---


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 642
Hi,

The wreck I saw at Chino was in a SEA como markings not natural metal.

Thanks Mike

_________________
IF YOU CAN FIND IT WE CAN FIX IT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 3:38 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:45 pm
Posts: 1095
Location: Kimberley, B. C. Canada
Thank you for that, Mike...

_________________
Neal Nurmi

---Wingman Photo---


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 10:45 am
Posts: 194
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Shay wrote:
Did 44-35326 N401Y sell?.........I don't see it list on Courtesy's website anymore.

Thanks

Shay


Something must be up with this On Mark
Image

Picture apears to be from October 07. Towbar installed and tyres are not flat any longer... hmm...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:00 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:45 pm
Posts: 1095
Location: Kimberley, B. C. Canada
Mistaken post -- I somehow screwed up in posting on The B-26K thread...

_________________
Neal Nurmi

---Wingman Photo---


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group