Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 30, 2025 7:17 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:47 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
Landing parachute hatch...I think.

I used to sit on the west side of Carswell AFB and watch the BUFFs fly. Always loved seeing them nose low climb out (center of gravity ahead of center of lift...I think.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 4:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:36 pm
Posts: 401
Location: Right here and now
Ztex wrote:
Landing parachute hatch...I think.

I used to sit on the west side of Carswell AFB and watch the BUFFs fly. Always loved seeing them nose low climb out (center of gravity ahead of center of lift...I think.


"B-52 flies unlike other aircraft. It takes off nose-low or level, a consequence of the tandem arrangement of its landing gear. This looks strange to most people, who are used to seeing aircraft take off nose-high. Since this requires a high wing incidence angle, the B-52 flies nose-down in cruise."

regards,

t~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:07 pm
Posts: 44
Location: Chester, Connecticut
The open hatch on the H model of the BUFF is the drag chute. We held off using the drag chute unless it was needed due to the runway RCR, weights, etc, as it saved the maintenance troops a lot of work. If the chute has been deployed, then the hatch stays open until it a freshly packed chute is put back in. Regarding the nose low attitute of the aircraft: If I recall, a "perfect" landing in the BUFF was when the rear mains touched while the front mains were about 6 inches off of the runway. Catching the front mains first resulted in a pretty good bouncing action. The aircraft has a crosswind crab landing gear, meaning you set the angle of the main gear in relation to your forward direction depending on the crosswind component. The aircraft is landed in a crab direction, no wing low technique, as the wing tips would hit. By the way, in the G model, the wings flexed from full down to full up about 18 feet. On a heavy weight aircraft, we would taxi out with both tip gears on the taxiway. When we came back, many, many hours later, the tip gear would be about 14 feet up in the air, so high you could not touch the bottom of them. Just a small imbalance of fuel in the wings would cause one wing to ride low and one to ride high on taxi-in, fairly embarrassing to the co-pilot, as it was his job to run the fuel panel. We had no flight engineer.

The basic gun system on the D and the G is the same, with the addition of optics for the D gunner. He could use visual aids to acquire targets pretty well. Both the D and G jettisoned the spent ammo casings, which could be tracked on our own search radar as they fell out of the aircraft. The H stored its spent casings. By the way, you can see how the tail of the G has been extended about 6 or 10 feet. This was to add ECM capabilities, but caused some jamming problems for the gunners as it also extended the flex ammo feed chutes. Or so we were told.

The tracking radar for the guns is under the radar on the turret itself, and the top radome on the G holds the search radar. The clamshells for the turret were quick released, Dzus fasteners.

Somone had commented on how the KC-135A was louder than the B-52Gs due to water injection. The G also used water injection, about 1,200 gallons, and used the same basic engine as the Strato-Bladder, Pratt & Whitney J-57s, straight turbojets. The tankers were louder because they lacked the sonic supressors in the exhaust portion of the engines we had on the BUFF. I have no idea why the tankers did not have these, but they were definitely louder with four engines than the BUFF's eight, in my opinion. The H uses the TF-33, military version of the JT-3D, turbofan, no water.

Craig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:33 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:01 am
Posts: 1126
Location: Post-Confederate People's Republic of Alabamastan, Suh!
Craig wrote:
Someone had commented on how the KC-135A was louder than the B-52Gs due to water injection. The G also used water injection, about 1,200 gallons, and used the same basic engine as the Strato-Bladder, Pratt & Whitney J-57s, straight turbojets. The tankers were louder because they lacked the sonic supressors in the exhaust portion of the engines we had on the BUFF. I have no idea why the tankers did not have these, but they were definitely louder with four engines than the BUFF's eight, in my opinion. The H uses the TF-33, military version of the JT-3D, turbofan, no water.


Heh heh. No doubt the As were louder than the J-57 x8 BUFs. Something I guess we'll never see again is the site of a BLACK sky after a full Tanker and BUF MITO (all water injected takeoffs, as you mention). I've got a video somebody else shot that I really need to have transferred to DVD which shows a memorable MITO off Barksdale's Runway 33 ... a B-52 purt near loses it (and I ain't kidding) - he slips and slides at low level like he's a Cessna caught up in all that jet wash. I showed it to some 8AF Stan/Eval folks and they whooped and hollered when they saw it. I'm quite sure that happened all the time (you may have even 'ridden' a wave or two), but rarely on film.

Wade

PS: Yes, the Hs glide by now with hardly a whisper during transitions. The only time they seem loud from the ground is when directly overhead and on takeoff - but even then it ain't nuthin' compared to the old loud and proud J-57 with water! Visiting relatives to our house were always amazed -

"GEEZUSKRIST! DID YOU HEAR THAT?"

"Hear what?" 8)

_________________
Website: http://www.wademeyersart.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Wade.Meyers.Studios

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
somebody farted!! :lol: :wink:

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: brian-livingston, Google [Bot] and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group