Ken wrote:
A thrust line offset is often lateral, a cant left or right but can be up or down as well. The cant is fixed but the forces on the airplane change with thrust; the resulting changes in torque/gyroscopic effect, spiral slipstream, and p-factor. Randy explained the effect of speed on pitch trim. Another reason for change in pitch trim is change of center of gravity. Wartime Mustangs had different pitch characteristics when the fuselage tank contained fuel; that's the large example. A more subtle example would be any tandem airplane pilot noting different trim settings, stick forces, or simply turning around and visually noting a slight change in elevator position when there is a rear seat passenger or change in load as compared to an empty airplane. Another reason is configuration change; extending flaps. Either way, the pilot finds a "new neutral" given the speed, configuration, and CG that day. For that reason I don't think any thrust line cant (fixed) could cause a greater effect than already provided for such as a common CG or configuration shift (dynamic).
Designers take all this into account when establishing the pitch trim range and pitch trim neutral. In general, wings provide lift and horizontal tails provide down force. The tails "negative" lift generates induced drag of its own - made greater when out of streamline. So,for efficiency, designers ideally install the horizontal tail with an angle of incidence to allow for streamlined elevators and trim in the heart of the operating envelope. Seems like this was one reason the handling of the F-86 improved so greatly when the flying horizontal tail was introduced; the tail could be positioned optimally for varying speed regimes. When we talk about the large forces involved with trimming a Reno racer nose down, that illustrates how the course speed differs greatly with the normal envelope of a stock Mustang. Without a flying tail, neutral trim will only be ideal in one speed/CG band; it will take unwanted deflection to go either really slow or really fast.
I'm on the record as being against speculation but a technical discussion is certainly fine with me whether it's on aerodynamics or paint. This thread has become too large to focus on just one thing, but I do hope that our top concern remains keeping this particularly respectful given the trauma that so many people are still going through.
Ken
P-51 doesn't have a L or R offset to the engine. The prop shaft is canted down 1 degree 45 sec on a stock P-51B,C,D or K when if left the factory.
Horizontal has 2 versions, early has a 2 degree positive angle and the late has a 1/2 degree positive angle.
I don't know how GG was set up so I'm not speculating on their setup.
If flying with a 2 degree horizontal then the down thrust line combined with an upward angle of the horizontal (lifting the tail) would be designed to lower the nose to fight the rising nose of an accelerating aircraft, at least to some degree. Because this relationship is fixed then the influence of the tail lifting force will vary as the speed varies I would guess.
One method of determining how these different racers were set up would be to examine the photos of them flying the straightaways on the course and look to see what trim position they have.
Racers have been known to run more toward the rear of the CG range as the weight the tail carries is on a smaller surface and induces less drag.