Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2025 11:00 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » General Discussion » The WIX Hangar

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 4
  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Ollie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:05 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
No, I'm serious, 6-7GPH. I'll get the true numbers from the pilot. Remember tha the CJ is much cleaner aerodynamically than a Yak-52.

8)

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB
Top
 Profile  
 
Edward Soye
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 132
Location: Toronto, Canada
Regardless of how clean the airframe is... the M14 is still a pretty big engine. Have to agree that I find 7 GPH hard to believe.

We've got one (well.. an AI14) that we're putting in our Sopwith Camel replica, so I'll check our M14 manual when I'm up at the museum tomorrow to confirm the fuel flow in cruise.
Top
 Profile  
 
Ollie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:00 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
It depends how much power you need to cruise along. I know he uses some setting and drones at 130 knots most of the time.

I'll ask him by email.

Stand by one.

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB
Top
 Profile  
 
JDK
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:00 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Nanchang safety note:

http://www.australianwarbirds.com.au/safety.asp

Lots in Australia, and some schemes here:

http://www.warbirdz.net/search.php

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com
Top
 Profile  
 
Ollie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:04 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
I were wrong... :oops:

14 GPH @ 660mmHG and 75% RPM.

But still cheaper than 17 GPH... :wink:

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB
Top
 Profile  
 
Dan Jones
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:13 pm 
Jeez Ollie... and here I was with a pint, a bar napkin, and my pen figuring out the engineering of how to hang one on the front of the Stearman! :P

Those still aren't bad numbers though, like you said. Kinda reminds me of dad's old Cadillac: if you let it just kinda fast-idle everywhere it went it wasn't hard on gas at all, but if you put your foot in it (NOT THAT THAT EVER HAPPENED, DAD!) she'd burn gas like you were flushin' a toilet.
Top
  
 
Ollie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:37 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
LMAO Dan!

6 GPH is probably the oil consumption..

:P

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB
Top
 Profile  
 
mennie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 6:27 am
Posts: 257
Location: Schiedam, NL
Still the question remains why you would want to cruise with a 360 HP engine and +6/-3.5 G limits. 8)

_________________
http://www.warbird-hangar.com links and gallery &
http://www.yakkes.com Yakkes Foundation, Yak-52
Top
 Profile  
 
JDK
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 3:26 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
mennie wrote:
Still the question remains why you would want to cruise with a 360 HP engine and +6/-3.5 G limits. 8)

Because not everyone lives in a teeny weeny (but lovely, of course) country? :D

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com
Top
 Profile  
 
Ollie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:46 am 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
Exactly. Going to Oshkpsh will see you cruise for close to 700NM.

:wink:

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB
Top
 Profile  
 
tomroyal
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:23 am
Posts: 41
Location: New Smyrna Beach, FL
Somewhere in one of my books I remember seeing a P-63 or a P-39 in a Russian White & Green snow camo scheme. It looked pretty cool with the Red Star adding contrast. I was trying to find an example to post, but couldn't find anything on the net. I think a Nanchang in that white/green snow camo scheme and red star would turn some heads.
Top
 Profile  
 
yakdriver
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 11:58 am
Posts: 127
My stock CJ would burn 15-17gph when out doing aerobatics or generally terrorizing the local population. Cruising at 10,000 ft or above would yield 13gph at max manifold pressure and 2000rpm and 140kts. Also I always told people if you can start it and taxi it you won't have any problem flying it. Took me a half hour or so to get the hang of taxiing and I have a lot of full swivel taildragger time. Its kinda like taxiing a B-25 or A-26, where the trouble is is when doing tight turns at slow speed the nosewheel flops over and is a bitch to get straight again. Very entertaining to let your buddies try it.
Top
 Profile  
 
Dan Jones
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:59 pm 
yakdriver wrote:
My stock CJ would burn 15-17gph when out doing aerobatics or generally terrorizing the local population. Cruising at 10,000 ft or above would yield 13gph at max manifold pressure and 2000rpm and 140kts.


Are there any rpm range restrictions for cruising it in regards to vibration?

yakdriver wrote:
Also I always told people if you can start it and taxi it you won't have any problem flying it. Took me a half hour or so to get the hang of taxiing and I have a lot of full swivel taildragger time. Its kinda like taxiing a B-25 or A-26, where the trouble is is when doing tight turns at slow speed the nosewheel flops over and is a bitch to get straight again. Very entertaining to let your buddies try it.


That's exactly the way it was described to me. Air brake operation prowess aside, how are the brakes? Does the rudder have any effectiveness when taxi-ing or is the steering all brakes?

Dan
Top
  
 
oscardeuce
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 1:05 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
How about a bright orange X-1 "Glamorus Glennis"?
Top
 Profile  
 
oscardeuce
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 1:05 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
How about a bright orange X-1 "Glamorus Glennis"?
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 4
  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Board index » General Discussion » The WIX Hangar

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Switch to mobile style
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group