John Beyl wrote:
muddyboots wrote:
I dunno. I have always been of the mindset that if it happened, it happened. quote]
That's a pretty free and easy place to live Muddy.
No matter what the media (including idle gossip), to read or hear thoughtless remarks, or misinformation about a lost friend really tends to cut deep. Walk a mile in the families and friends shoes before speaking or showing photos. It’s a respect issue which is sadly lacking in the world today. You will never fully appreciate what I speak of until you experience it first hand. God knows I truly hope you never have to experience it.
John
Actually it's a pretty hard place to live. You assume I have not been through this, but I can assure you I have. As I said, it's not the photo that shows the most gore that is important, but the photo that tells the biggest, or most important story. At times that photo can be painful for those closest to the deceased. As painful as it is, and as bad as I would feel, I would publish. Every time. Some things are just that important. It's not the gore, or the excitement. It's the necessity of the thing. As I said, the problem is that there are those who don't see the difference between important, and lucrative.
hink of Kennedy and the Zapruda film. I am sure Jackie O wept inside every time they showed her grabbing that piece of her husband's skull. But it's overal import cannot be understated. Publish. Should the photo of the pilot hurtling out of his aircraft be published? Not unless it actually serves the greater good. Otherwise it's just money grubbing or voyerism. Neither of which is what journalism is about.