This is one of those tedious arguments that comes around again and again, in this case from a zombie thread. Great.
bipe215 wrote:Nobody here can 100% percent prove that Welch did it, but no one can 100% prove that he did not.
There's no onus on 'proving he did not'. I'm not suggesting Steve's doing this, but just bear in mind the demand from negative proof is a classic symptom of conspiracy-theorist dubious data management.
bipe215 wrote:Good grief. No body is claiming Welch's boom was official. But just because something isn't official according to some governing body, doesn't mean it didn't happen. That's pretty weak.
The correct term is that Yeager in the Bell X-1 was
officially the first through the sound barrier, because it was documented. It is a
documented fact. Certainly it is possible that other may have been through the sound barrier first - but without documentation it will be a disputed possibility. Hence the 'official data' validates the Bell X-1 and Yeager and no other precursor, as Chris is saying.
It's not a question of something only being recognised because it's documented, but the documentation ensures it is a fact, not a matter of opinion. This is part of the basic scientific method. (The other element, that the experiment can be repeated with the same results under identical conditions, is of note.)
For those who loathe Yeager, there's comfort in that the achievement did not count as an internationally recognised speed record with the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) because the X-1 was not a self-launched aircraft capable of taking off and getting the record in the same flight, a base requirement for such pure speed (not the barrier) aeronautical records.
Regards,
Last edited by
JDK on Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.