Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Apr 01, 2026 12:21 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:16 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
OK...I'll agree that BoB is a great piece...BUT...From our tours of the D-Day beaches and the tour of the route of Easy Co., Mr. Hanks and Mr. Spielberg took a few liberties with the facts. Many of the scenes depicted in the series never happened that way. (Jiggers has BTDT and he'll probably agree with me.)
Don't know how many of you have done those tours and I'm not trying to set myself up as an expert so don't everyone jump on me at once. :hide:
We've done the tours twice and gotten the same story both times from two different guides.

Sorry to hear about "Shifty". Talked to him for a couple of minutes at last years MAAM WWII weekend.

Mudge the fact finder

OK...:crispy: but keep it civil

ps. did you know that Tom Hanks bought one of the summer houses at Omaha Beach?

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:40 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:06 am
Posts: 1059
Location: Virginia
Jiggers, how is Major Winters doing?

I've been to Normandy 3 times and Bastogne once, walked through the woods near Foy at dawn, amazing to think of what happened at those places.




-

_________________
http://www.biplanerides1.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:15 pm
Posts: 951
The Major was 91 last January and battling Parkinsons disease. He is still sharp as a tack and giving it his best every day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 8:10 am
Posts: 235
Ashamed to say I never watched Band of Brothers.... :(

_________________
Cheers

Daz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 3:22 am
Posts: 422
Location: Melbourne
Mudge wrote:
OK...I'll agree that BoB is a great piece...BUT...From our tours of the D-Day beaches and the tour of the route of Easy Co., Mr. Hanks and Mr. Spielberg took a few liberties with the facts. Many of the scenes depicted in the series never happened that way. (Jiggers has BTDT and he'll probably agree with me.)
Don't know how many of you have done those tours and I'm not trying to set myself up as an expert so don't everyone jump on me at once. :hide:
We've done the tours twice and gotten the same story both times from two different guides.

Sorry to hear about "Shifty". Talked to him for a couple of minutes at last years MAAM WWII weekend.

Mudge the fact finder

OK...:crispy: but keep it civil

ps. did you know that Tom Hanks bought one of the summer houses at Omaha Beach?


I agree, when you've watched it a few times as I have, some of the errors get pretty annoying. But it's still brilliant viewing.

A good friend here in Melb worked on the sets of the Pacific one coming out soon and said the effort, detail and scale is even more phenominal. I can't wait for it really!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:15 pm
Posts: 951
JägerMarty wrote:
Mudge wrote:
OK...I'll agree that BoB is a great piece...BUT...From our tours of the D-Day beaches and the tour of the route of Easy Co., Mr. Hanks and Mr. Spielberg took a few liberties with the facts. Many of the scenes depicted in the series never happened that way. (Jiggers has BTDT and he'll probably agree with me.)
Don't know how many of you have done those tours and I'm not trying to set myself up as an expert so don't everyone jump on me at once. :hide:
We've done the tours twice and gotten the same story both times from two different guides.

Sorry to hear about "Shifty". Talked to him for a couple of minutes at last years MAAM WWII weekend.

Mudge the fact finder

OK...:crispy: but keep it civil

ps. did you know that Tom Hanks bought one of the summer houses at Omaha Beach?


I agree, when you've watched it a few times as I have, some of the errors get pretty annoying. But it's still brilliant viewing.

A good friend here in Melb worked on the sets of the Pacific one coming out soon and said the effort, detail and scale is even more phenominal. I can't wait for it really!



Here is a link that will give the skinny on the mistakes in BOB.

http://www.101airborneww2.com/bandofbrothers.html

HBO is in the entertainment business and historical aacuracy took a back seat to financial considerations in many things.

.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:48 pm
Posts: 244
Location: San Carlos California
I highly recommend to read the book, Beyond the Band of Brothers by Dick Winters and Col Cole Kingseed . :oops: It gets more in-depth into Major Winters and also "fixes" some of the mistakes in BOB. Also there was a story of a mock battle where captain Sobel was one of the "wounded" soldiers. While he was on the strecher, someone actually put him "out". While he was out, someone put a small incision with stitches. As to say, he was non to pleased. Very good reading however.

_________________
Some people are like slinkys, good for nothing but bring a smile to your face when pushed down stairs.


Last edited by bugazon on Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:15 pm
Posts: 951
bugazon wrote:
I highly recommend to read the book, Beyond the Band of Brothers by Dick Winters and Steve Ambrose. It gets more in-depth into Major Winters and also "fixes" some of the mistakes in BOB. Also there was a story of a mock battle where captain Sobel was one of the "wounded" soldiers. While he was on the strecher, someone actually put him "out". While he was out, someone put a small incision with stitches. As to say, he was non to pleased. Very good reading however.


I recommend also ,

Brothers in Battle by Wild Bill Guarnere & Babe Heffron

Biggest Brother , By Larry Alexander

and 3 otehrs who 's exact names and Authors escape me this morning.

Marcus Botherton's "Those who Remain" and his work on Buck Compton.

And, Don Malarkey's book .


Last edited by Jiggersfromsphilly on Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:21 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Jiggersfromsphilly wrote:
Here is a link that will give the skinny on the mistakes in BOB.

http://www.101airborneww2.com/bandofbrothers.html

HBO is in the entertainment business and historical aacuracy took a back seat to financial considerations in many things.


Unfortunately, like many critiques, the author, in only the critiques of the first 2 episodes, had several items that he claimed to be "easily fixed" that unfortunately aren't.

The first was his comment about parapacks. I'm sure all of us here will agree that there are two things that make it difficult to quickly modify a real aircraft to have them - insurance and regulatory agencies. The aircraft in the series shown with parapacks installed already had them, meaning they'd already gone through the paperwork and inspections. I doubt in the timeframe allowed for production that they could have done the same for the other aircraft. In addition, I don't know that all of the owners of the aircraft would have been "game" for it. And as CGI was very sparsely used in the series, adding parapacks would have added unnecessary cost and time to the post-production period.

The second was his comment about the lack of hearing or seeing the 8 and 14-inch shells exploding. There's two things I can think of off the top of my head that would be problematic with this. First being - how does one know what such an explosion sounds like? There's not a lot of high quality audio of such explosions available as neither caliber has been used since the 1960s. Second, if they wished to replicate it with an effect, they would have had a lot of serious additional permitting and preparation to do because of the massive size of such an explosion and the resulting minor earthquake it'd cause. It's one thing to say that they're "inexpensive" to fix, but sometimes the logistical time required to get it done isn't that small.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:20 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5627
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
I just watched this series for the fourth time when I picked up the tin at Target last week. I must agree that it gets better each and every time. And while there might be some flaws, they are minor and show me a flawless war movie anyway, there aren't any. It is a great series and I highly recomend it to anyone interested in World War II or military topics.

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:47 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
>>The second was his comment about the lack of hearing or seeing the 8 and 14-inch shells exploding. There's two things I can think of off the top of my head that would be problematic with this. First being - how does one know what such an explosion sounds like? There's not a lot of high quality audio of such explosions available as neither caliber has been used since the 1960s. <<

Wouldn't there be some higher class audio of 16" guns from the Iowas dating only to the early 1990's. As for 8" doesn't the Army still have some long range howitzers of 8" caliber? Frankly I was happy that they didn't use lots of gasoline to make thier artillery explosions.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:06 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
John Dupre wrote:
Frankly I was happy that they didn't use lots of gasoline to make thier artillery explosions.


Yeah...they do tend to overuse the napthalene in H'wood.

Mudge the critic :wink:

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:35 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3418
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
John Dupre wrote:
Wouldn't there be some higher class audio of 16" guns from the Iowas dating only to the early 1990's. As for 8" doesn't the Army still have some long range howitzers of 8" caliber? Frankly I was happy that they didn't use lots of gasoline to make thier artillery explosions.


The largest rifle in the Army inventory is the 155mm Paladin SPH and it's trailer mounted cousins. That's a roughly 6" caliber.

As for the 16" vs 14", the lower quality recordings I've heard (from WWII and incidentally of the Iowa and Texas respectively) sound quite different. I think a lot of it has to do with the much larger standard powder load per pound of projectile that was possible with the 16" gun.

I think that in the end, had they done it the way they wanted to (i.e. with as little CGI and SFX as possible), they would have needed to actually create the explosion on set, something not really feasible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Beautiful Downtown Natick, MA
IMHO, there are many reasons why BoB is so good and rewarding to watch multiple times.
Obviously it is a terrific true story. However, unlike many movie adaptations of historical events, BoB actually tells the many stories in a motion picture way, as opposed to having actors "relate" and "act" the events. BoB never forgot to tell the story, not merely shooting history.
The best example is the episode where they attack Foy. (excuse my faulty memory) In the heat of battle an officer is replaced. At the end of the episode, the Sgt. says to the Lt. something like "the men now have a leader" and the Lt. says "They had one all along". The Sgt. says "Who?". The Lt. says "you". That's when you realize the story being told in that episode was as much about the Sgt. as the events. They did this for every episode. That is why its compelling.
The casting of the actors is first rate and the directing/acting equally so. By every measure, this is a fine example of motion picture story-telling...the best way to educate is to engage the mind and the emotions.
Sorry for the bit of a ramble, but lets get w-a-y past the relatively truly minor inaccuracies and applaud its successful treatment of the truth in every sense of that word.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:47 pm
Posts: 10
The first official look at the follow-on series "The Pacific' has now been released.

http://www.pacificfans.com/trailer.mov


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group