This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:54 am

They're not warbird pilots...they're very naughty boys!!!

Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:34 pm

That's Velly Intelesting!? :shock: :roll:

Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:00 pm

To get slightly back to the original topic... Phantom flew a very successful FCF today and was pronounced Code 2 flyable with a few very minor squawks. The jet is solid.

Thu Mar 31, 2005 12:55 am

Broken-Wrench wrote: What you havn't taken ito account Mr Reporter is that if a maintenace Fed reads what you wrote it kind of hints at unproper maintenance is being performed on the aircraft which could warrent a visit by a Maintenace FED. They then go thru your records and and the aircraft looking for discrepancies. I have went thru more B.S. for rumors someone started regarding A/C. So you skirted the law but you probably started alot of Sh%4 for Somebody. ?I know the boys I worked for in Dallas had their legal teams put heads on a stick for writing things llike that.


What's the matter, you don't like reporters?
:D :D :D
If your paranoid fears are correct....the feds snooping around may not be a bad thing. Why?
If a high profile jet warbird (not mentioning any names here) did another Sacramento ice cream shop incident, it would open up a can of trouble that would spell the end to all jet (and maybe non-jet) warbird flying.
In these days days of money hunting lawyers, it never hurts to be extra careful.
Post a reply