Tiger Tim wrote:
CoastieJohn wrote:
I'll stick with two different planes (or paint jobs at different dates?)
More likely two different cameras used to photograph the same plane. IIRC there were at least two different black and white photographic processes, or film types, or whatever. This is why some old photos show reds and yellows as being extremely light (almost white) and some show those colours as very dark (nearly black).
CoastieJohn wrote:
The 1st pick clearly shows the large black walkway stripe with no numbers... The 4th pic from roughly the same angle does not show the black walkway stripe and does show the numbers where the stripe would go thru.
I don't think that stripe on top of the wing was a black walkway. Someone more versed in Clippers could confirm but I think it was bright orange. If that's the case it's not a stretch for the upper markings on the wing to look black in some pics and much lighter in others.
-Tim
I am not well versed on either matter but, ....
yes, there are two different photographic processes just as you describe. I don't recall their names but, I do have a 1940's era photography book that explains it.
The "walkways" on pre-war 314's were orange. During the war, they got a different paint job. After, the war, I cannot say what colors the planes may have gotten.
Wildchild wrote:
JohnB wrote:
In the name of God, don't mention this to TIGHAR...it would keep them going for years.

They would spend millions searching the aera AROUND the plane, looking for the plane.
Photographic evidence indicates the aircraft was on the water, notice the ship in the background.
By expert, modern analysis of the waves it has been determined the location is near a remote island in the Marshall islands.
Didn't one of the passengers have freckle cream?