oldman wrote:
Dan Johnson II wrote:
This has to be the dumbest statement I've ever seen on this forum and there have been some dumb ones over the years.
Right now you clearly don't have one and your own inherent racism is showing.
I am not racist and why is my statement dumb?
Where did I write anything negative about African Americans?
Too quick to judge. you just want to jump on the bandwagon to start something.
I have nothings against Red Tail pilots.
I am not of the opinion that only certain groups in ww2 wuz more important. All were important!
Is my point more understandable now?
No it's just as stupid as the first time.
How many movies from WW2 on have covered white soldiers? Hundreds? A thousand? Now how many have covered the experience of black soldiers? I can think of 3 at the moment. Lets see, they were covering the white soldiers of WW2 from during the war on, covering specific units etc. It took til 1996 to get a single film on a black unit made? And somehow they're getting too much coverage as being too important?
Should we go down the list of specific units covered since WW2? How bout the last week? Lets see, we had SPR on tonight, that pointed at the 2nd Rangers, and had a 101st airborne element. Guadalcanal Diary was on tonight. That's the 1st Marines isn't it? Thirty Seconds over Tokyo was last weekend and that's a specific unit. Hmmm Flying Tigers have been covered. 8th AF Bombers more then once with the 91st BG usually showing front and center, whether it be Memphis Belle or 12 )' Clock High. Throw in The War Lover as well. The list goes on forever.
So again tell me how the 332nd has been made more important then the others again? Maybe the question you should have asked, considering the uniqueness of the story, why it wasn't done many years ago. But then again we don't want to go there do we?