Cubs wrote:
I suffer sometimes from "foot in mouth" disease so, at the risk of having another bout of it....
Some guy takes a picture in October 1937, 4 months after AE/Noonan disappearance. I would think this would still be big news and at the forefront of most folks minds. O.k. so far?
If a guy is out in a boat and there is an object, on shore, that looks like a landing gear wouldn't that person go investigate? I mean, in the photo, it's a small, blurry object but, to the person actually looking in that direction, I think it would appear larger and more distinct. It would have been visually significant (naked eye) enough that someone would have investigated it, right then and there.
Am I going to be chewing on my Nike's?
Not sure why the photo was taken, but from the story so far, I don't think anyone in 1937 noticed the possible gear strut in the photo. As I understand it, the identification of the strut in the water came from modern day analysis of the original photo.
I think it is a stretch, but as long as they raise private funding and are not using US taxpayer dollars for the search, I have no problem with them searching. I certainly won't lose any sleep over it.
As I mentioned earlier, the thing I find most interesting about this latest news is that Bob Ballard was actually at the press conference to lend some sort of support to their claims. While TIGHAR has a rather dubious reputation, Ballard is a pretty solid dude and not the kind of guy to just throw an endorsement around wildy. He has a pretty solid reputation in the underwater exploration/archaeolgy world and not just some crackpot. I'm not sure if Ballard is going to be directly involved in the operation, or he was just there for moral support, but either Ballard thinks they are legitimately on to something.....or he has gone senile.