This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:31 pm
T-28mike wrote:Problem really is that the cost of re-build does not come close to market value. Not too many serious collectors wish to spend 1.5- 2 mil to restore a 1 mil aircraft. The wildcat is a prime example. Spend 1.2 mil to restore a 900K airframe. Just my .02 + 30 years experience worth.
If you do your own work it's not that expensive
Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:40 pm
Wildchild wrote:T-28mike wrote:Problem really is that the cost of re-build does not come close to market value. Not too many serious collectors wish to spend 1.5- 2 mil to restore a 1 mil aircraft. The wildcat is a prime example. Spend 1.2 mil to restore a 900K airframe. Just my .02 + 30 years experience worth.
If you do your own work it's not that expensive

Yep, it costs even more.... Divorces don't come cheap these days!!!
Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:13 pm
bdk wrote:JohnTerrell wrote:I believe "Brooklyn Bum 2nd" has a special spray bar added in as a preventive measure to keep the coolant temps down when it should become critical to do so.
Yes, it has spraybars, it can be a long taxi to and from the runway at Chino where it was initially flown. I haven't heard that the CAF example or any of the P-63s regularly operate with spraybars. Anyone know about those?
I was at the Centex CAF Museum right after Thanksgiving and asked a couple of questions about whether their pilots preferred the P-39 or the P-63. The answer was "The P-63, it has a wider gear and doesn't have the cooling problems the P-39 does."
I'm guessing it doesn't have a spray bar.
Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:29 pm
Hi! I'm the Maintenance Officer at the CAF Centex Wing and I can answer a few of the questions I've seen here.
The CAF P-39, "Miss Connie", does have a spraybar. We have a 25 gallon water tank in the nose along with a lot of lead ballast. The P-63 does not have the cooling problems that the P-39 has. They both run the Allison 1710, but the P-63 has two cooling radiators, each of which is much larger than the one P-39 radiator. The intake port on the P-63 is a single opening on each wing for both the oil and coolant ducts with a much larger area than the P-39, which has two relatively small openings on each wing for oil and coolant ducting.
I have separate threads for both the Centex P-39 and the CAF P-63 on WIX, though I haven't updated them lately. We recently had issues with the P-63 radiators and there are pictures that might be of value.
The P-63 winter condition inspection is underway as should be completed in a couple of weeks. Our P-39 is finally getting some work completed and should be back in the air by February. Check those threads for updates!
Thanks!
Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:52 pm
SaxMan wrote:I don't think we would see a P-39 renaissance. The other planes that you mentioned: Hurricane, P-40, P-47, were all usually well regarded by those that flew them and generally well regarded by historians. The P-39 was not held in such high regard (except for the Russians), and historians, likewise, have not spoken well of the P-39. I think that reputation takes away from the plane popularity and the ability for it to be widely restored and flown today.
The P-39 filled a need when there was no other plane available. As soon as other planes became available, it was unceremoniously kicked to the curb. I can't recall seeing any account of a P-39 pilot regretting having to switch to another aircraft. Burke Davis in "Get Yammamoto" indicated that Japanese pilots said they preferred to meet the P-39 over any other Allied aircraft.
Do I personally think the P-39 is a cool plane? Absolutely. Would have I wanted to go into combat in one? Absolutely not.
interesting post saxman!! i say this because many experimental japanese aircraft of ww 2 that never made it beyond the drawing board have the basic p -39's lines / fuselage shape, etc sans the "car door". to perk your curiosity check out the book "japanese secret projects" experimental aircraft of the IJA 1939 - 1945 by edwin m. dyer III & you'll see how many prototypes smack of the p -39. duplication is the best form of a compliment i'd say!!the 39 even got a thumbs up from chuck yeager!! i can see the infared dot on me now from the pundits!!!
Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:20 pm
Lets pool our money and go after the P-39 that went into the Allegheny River near Pittsburgh and was never recoverd!!!!!!!
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.