SaxMan wrote:
I don't think we would see a P-39 renaissance. The other planes that you mentioned: Hurricane, P-40, P-47, were all usually well regarded by those that flew them and generally well regarded by historians. The P-39 was not held in such high regard (except for the Russians), and historians, likewise, have not spoken well of the P-39. I think that reputation takes away from the plane popularity and the ability for it to be widely restored and flown today.
The P-39 filled a need when there was no other plane available. As soon as other planes became available, it was unceremoniously kicked to the curb. I can't recall seeing any account of a P-39 pilot regretting having to switch to another aircraft. Burke Davis in "Get Yammamoto" indicated that Japanese pilots said they preferred to meet the P-39 over any other Allied aircraft.
Do I personally think the P-39 is a cool plane? Absolutely. Would have I wanted to go into combat in one? Absolutely not.
interesting post saxman!! i say this because many experimental japanese aircraft of ww 2 that never made it beyond the drawing board have the basic p -39's lines / fuselage shape, etc sans the "car door". to perk your curiosity check out the book "japanese secret projects" experimental aircraft of the IJA 1939 - 1945 by edwin m. dyer III & you'll see how many prototypes smack of the p -39. duplication is the best form of a compliment i'd say!!the 39 even got a thumbs up from chuck yeager!! i can see the infared dot on me now from the pundits!!!
