Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Aug 21, 2025 8:40 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:50 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Atlanta, GA
USS North Carolina Museum:

http://inflight.squarespace.com/feature ... -kind.html

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:28 am
Posts: 439
Location: Galena Park Texas
I drove over to the Texas today to brainstorm a bit. I took a few pictures that I thought some of you might enjoy. Turret number three that once had the Kingfisher catapult attached to it shows no real sign of there ever having been such a device on top.

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
The nose art/aviation artist and general lunatic from Houston, Texas http://www.jasonbarnettartist.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:48 pm
Posts: 937
Location: Westchester New York
When did they put a battleship on the National Mall in DC? :shock:
carlisle1926 wrote:

Image

_________________
Andrew King
Air Museum Director with no Museum to Direct
Open to Suggestions


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:32 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3414
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
That's the San Jacinto monument. Got a huge star on top of it, so it's easily distinguished from the Washington Monument.

It's also 15 feet taller than the Washington Monument and made of cordova shell stone instead of marble. And before anyone says that Texans made it taller on purpose, the monument was built by a Public Works grant during the 1930's and approved by Washington, D.C.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 3:45 pm
Posts: 197
Location: Denver, Colorado
Did a model of the USS Texas - if you want to do one in a really small scale. :lol:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:28 am
Posts: 439
Location: Galena Park Texas
dbrown wrote:
Did a model of the USS Texas - if you want to do one in a really small scale. :lol:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

That's a great model! I hope they give me the go ahead to start the giant USS Texas model soon. My version will be all steel and require tons of hours of welding and I can only hope it comes out as detailed and nice as yours. Making something that detailed in small scale like you did is a major achievement.

_________________
The nose art/aviation artist and general lunatic from Houston, Texas http://www.jasonbarnettartist.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:09 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Atlanta, GA
IIRC, the fiberglass mold is taken from an original to ensure the shapes are correct, not necessarily to create multiples, although this becomes an obvious bonus. I've seen fiberglass P-51s outside restaurants and such which included all sorts of details such as dzus fasteners and whatnot and were quite good. Other than finding someone willing to allow their airplane to be molded, is there a downside?

OTOH, the foam carving idea sounds fine too and I suspect that there are CAD programs today that could cut the foam quickly and easily versus the hand-made craftsmanship, plans interpretation, and number crunching that might have been required 25 years ago. If this route was chosen, would it be possible/practical to alter the airfoil shape in such a fashion as to not affect its visual appearance, but make it less "lifty" with regard to winds, storms, etc?

Ken

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 9:56 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11330
On the airfoil section, you could just make it symmetrical and the lift would be determined by the angle of attack. You could do the airfoil upside-down, but that might look odd depending on the original section. You could do a symmetrical airfoil and install it a couple of degrees nose-down to kill lift further.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group