Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Sep 20, 2025 8:08 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 1:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
hang the expense wrote:
IIRC that's what the swoose is.I believe she had her wings changed in panama CZ.I may be wrong.So yes to your question.


I think you're confusing the Swoose with the Boeing 307 that is at Udvar-Hazy. The 307 was fitted with B-17G wings later in its career.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:21 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
SaxMan wrote:
hang the expense wrote:
IIRC that's what the swoose is.I believe she had her wings changed in panama CZ.I may be wrong.So yes to your question.


I think you're confusing the Swoose with the Boeing 307 that is at Udvar-Hazy. The 307 was fitted with B-17G wings later in its career.

You're correct. Old age is firmly entrenched here.Its got me bad.

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 20, 2014 5:46 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4337
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Not to drag this too far off-topic, but I'm curious about the 307 at U-H. Were the wings modified to their original configuration during restoration? She now appears to have the original-style nacelles and cowls, and has fixed leading-edge slots in the outer wings. She also has the older external oil coolers.

SN

Image

#1 Engine..

Image

#3 Engine..

Image

Outer wing..

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:44 pm
Posts: 151
This probably ought to be split off as a separate thread...

But, since the Boeing 307 Stratoliner was originally based on the B-17C; it had the same wings, tail, rudder, landing gear, and engines... Also, it had a new 138 inch diameter fuselage that was one of the pressurized passenger cabins.

The 307 had the same stability issues of the B-17 "shark fin" models and eventually ended up with the B-17E's tail.

Boeing built ten 307s: one prototype, three to Pan Am, five to TWA, and one to Howard Hughes.

Five of TWA's 307s were converted to C-75 by removing the cabin pressurization mechanical in January 1942.

At the end of the war, the Army Transport Command returned the C-75s to TWA and Boeing remanufactured and recertified them for civilian use. The wings were probably tired (like the Swoose's). Since there were a lot of surplus B-17G parts available to Boeing after the war, the plane was upgraded and improved to the most current standard. Most notably the G's wings and higher higher horsepower motors.

I consider the art deco Boeing 307 to be one of the most attractive and significant prewar designs. It didn't have the longevity of the niche oriented DC-3 or Curtis C-46. Then again, they didn't build very many of them.

I cringe every time I think of the March 2002 Puget Sound water landing of the Smithsonian's 307
Image
Image

I wonder if any bits and pieces of the five crashed Royal Air Laos/Aigle-Azur Boeing 307s in Indochina have survived?

We will not talk about the "Cosmic Muffin".
Image
http://inhabitat.com/the-cosmic-muffin-a-boat-recycled-from-howard-hughes-plane/
http://thepirata.com/the-plane-boat/
http://www.jordanyachts.com/archives/5707

The water landing on Puget Sound
http://www.bobqat.com/AeroBob/307/Recovery.html
http://www.king5.com/news/cities/seattle/10-years-ago-today-Boeing-307-crashed-into-Elliott-Bay-144269985.html
http://www.komonews.com/news/archive/4037241.html?tab=video&c=y
http://msgboard.snopes.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=81;t=000072;p=0
http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/n19903/photo.shtml

Restoration after water landing in Puget Sound
http://www.airspacemag.com/flight-today/restoration-soggy-stratoliner-32605581/?page=1

_________________
Keep your PDI centered!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 8:18 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4337
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Swapping out the original wings for new B-17G units would certainly make sense. But I'm curious about the surviving 307, which obviously still has the earlier wings and nacelles. Pictures of her at Pima "back in the day" show the same. You mention that the TWA Stratoliners were rebuilt with B-17G wings..I'm assuming that since the NASM 307 was a Pan Am aircraft, she didn't get the structural mods (other than the bigger tail, which was added while she was still with Pan Am.) I agree with you that the 307 really captures the style of the era..she would look right at home in a Buck Rogers comic book. We're planning another visit to Udvar-Hazy this summer, and I'm looking forward to seeing Clipper Flying Cloud again. To me, she's one of the top jewels of the collection.

We now return to the previous B-17 thread, already in progress..

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:44 pm
Posts: 151
I didn't find anything about the three Pan Am Boeing 307 Stratoliners going in for a retrofit to Boeing after the war or even serving with Army Transport Command as C-75s. It doesn't mean they didn't, but that may explain the retention of the early B-17C wing and nacelle configuration.

Boeing's Chief Aerodynamcist Ralph Cram was killed in the March 18, 1939 crash of the prototype Boeing 307 Stratoliner.

They hired George S. Schairer to replace Cram and to develop and test the Stratoliner.

Schairer redesigned and enlarged the vertical tail section. (Schairer went on to work on the aerodynamics of the B-29, adaptation of German swept wing design, B-47, B-52, 707, XB-70, 727, 737, and 747)

The modifications, the larger vertical fin surface, and the incorporation of aerodynamically balanced control surfaces (replacing spring tabs) made its way into the new B-17E.

I think you could say that the Boeing 307's development/modification lead to the defining point between the early (Model 229 through B-17D) and late (B-17E through B-17G) B-17s.

The Smithsonian's plane was delivered to Pan Am March 22, 1940. The B-17E production started 27 September 1941.

Image
Boeing 307 NC19903 with the original small vertical stabilizer before its delivery to Pan Am
Image
Pan Am Boeing S-307 Clipper Flying Cloud NX19903 with the enlarged vertical stabilizer.
Image
At least one of the Pan Am 307s pictured here has the "big tail".

Citations:

Abzug, Malcolm J. and Larrabee, E. Eugene, Airplane Stability and Control; A History of the Technologies That Made Aviation Possible; Second Edition, Cambridge Aerospace Series, 2002.

Schairer, George S. "Directional Stability and Vertical Surface Stalling", Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol.8 No.7.

http://www.air-and-space.com/Boeing%20307%20N19903.htm

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-17E.html

_________________
Keep your PDI centered!


Last edited by Left Seat on Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:31 pm, edited 9 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:44 pm
Posts: 151
Does any one have any pictures of the NMUSAF's "Memphis Bell" and or "Swoose" ... taken within the last couple of months that they would like to post?

_________________
Keep your PDI centered!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:12 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4337
Location: Battle Creek, MI
I haven't been over to the restoration hangars since the fall of 2012. I think they just recently started giving tours again..they stopped for a year or so due to the "sequester." I'd definitely like to see the Belle's current status. I doubt much if anything has happened with The Swoose since I saw her last. She's most likely still just lurking in the corner waiting her turn.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:16 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5754
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
The latest restoration update from the NMUSAF indicates work has stopped temporarily on the Swoose in favor of other projects. I assume the Belle is taking up most of the resources these days. www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/exhibits/rest ... /index.asp

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 3:05 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2979
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Nice to see (read) that the WB-50 is getting some interior work done on her. Wish they would post some pictures... :roll:

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group