Cherrybomber13 wrote:
Side by side of the LB-30 and B-24D other than the nose and gun positions most people would never know. Although I would think touring the inside would be more exciting on a real 24.
WarbirdKid's Grandfather was on a B-24 so Im sure there is a certain fondness as well. At this point if someone is willing to pump metric tons of cash into a project for fly I wont be complaining about the paint job or the lack of guns.
Untitled-2 by
Drew King, on Flickr
I think that there is a little bit of a misconception about what an LB-30 is. An LB-30 isn't a transport designation. It is the designation for the
Liberator and
Liberator II which were the export versions of the B-24. There were several configurations: bomber, transport, patrol, etc. You posted a picture of a transport version. Below is a picture of a bomber version. An LB-30 restored to original bomber configuration would be just as interesting as a B-24D and I'd be surprised if many would even know the difference.
ROYAL AIR FORCE: OPERATIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA, 1939-1943.. © IWM (CBM 1261)IWM Non Commercial Licence
