Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:31 pm
Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:44 pm
Garth wrote:I’m seeing four TBDs in the pics. T4, T5, T8 and T9.
ALL took part in the attack on Shoho. T4 and T9 scored confirmed hits ...
Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:45 pm
Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:01 pm
Jerry O'Neill wrote:BTW, I believe Paul Allen is involved the recovery of the C-2 lost last year.
Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:20 pm
Mark Allen M wrote:VF-3 was on board the Lex for Coral Sea, and Felix was their squadron emblem, seen clearly on the forward fuselage. The number appears to be F-5, meaning this plane would have been flow by Ensign Dale W. Peterson during that fateful period. "(The First Team", Lundstrom, p. 107)
Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:30 pm
TAdan wrote:The condition of that Wildcat and those TBDs is just stunning!
Mon Mar 05, 2018 8:37 pm
Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:20 pm
Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:43 pm
Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:49 pm
Dan Jones wrote:I would bet that at that depth and with the relative lack of free oxygen the airplanes are relatively structurally sound and could be raised. They’re far enough away to not be part of the Lexington grave site per se, and their raising could be considered a valuable recovery/training exercise. Certainly Mr Allen would have to throw down for the majority of the immediate expenses but I think this could be negotiated to the benefit of everyone. I’m optimistically holding my breath. How cool would it be to see a Coral Sea combat vet TBD in Pensacola and another one flying with the FHC?
Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:59 pm
Dan K wrote:Dan Jones wrote:I would bet that at that depth and with the relative lack of free oxygen the airplanes are relatively structurally sound and could be raised. They’re far enough away to not be part of the Lexington grave site per se, and their raising could be considered a valuable recovery/training exercise. Certainly Mr Allen would have to throw down for the majority of the immediate expenses but I think this could be negotiated to the benefit of everyone. I’m optimistically holding my breath. How cool would it be to see a Coral Sea combat vet TBD in Pensacola and another one flying with the FHC?
The LAST thing desired is having the Navy treat this as a recovery/training exercise. Their last attempt at such an endeavor resulted in the Lake Washington PBM having its tail torn off and the rest being "preserved in situ". No, I'm hopeful the Navy has learned its lesson on recovery: Leave it to the experts (aka "Taras"!)
And as much as I would like to believe that their restoration protocol has improved, the Navy's track record with multiple wrecks has been to cannibalize the many to create one (or, at best, a few) static displays...then scrap what was left. Personally, I would be very concerned over multiple aircraft being recovered.
Mon Mar 05, 2018 10:52 pm
Dan Jones wrote:
Some years ago though, the Navy did successfully recover an F6F off the coast of California from very deep water and made a good job of it.
Mon Mar 05, 2018 10:59 pm
Jerry O'Neill wrote:Dan Jones wrote:
Some years ago though, the Navy did successfully recover an F6F off the coast of California from very deep water and made a good job of it.
Yes, but years later, and after the PBM debacle, they mucked up the F3F that MOH awardee Galer flew. Had to be totally rebuilt after the Navy crunched the intact wings.
Tue Mar 06, 2018 7:41 am
Tue Mar 06, 2018 8:37 am