TimAPNY wrote:
Did not the group that “owed” the Belle have a copy write over the Nose art? I remembered when I visited the Memphis Belle in 96 while at Mud Island the guy at the store saying they had a copy write on the nose art and no one could use it. If you look at the David’s Belle and the Real Belle you will notice differences, I was told those were made so it would not infringement on the copy write (look at the chick’s arm)
So my point is that David's Belle nose art is different so it would not violate the copy write.
Tim
I don't know about copy
right (I doubt it) but that group did have trademarks on the nose art. They have been transferred to NMUSAF, probably at the same time as the aircraft. Trademarks are different than copyrights in some important relevant ways.
August
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
