Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Aug 27, 2025 4:30 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:03 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Alan, what was the required dollar amount to have the aircraft assigned, and did the Wisconsin Wing receive the monies from the sale to Mr. Savage?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 11:20 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3414
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
You don't seem to understand how the CAF works. There was no money required to be paid to anyone to get the aircraft assigned, only a project plan in place to get the airplane back flying again. That is how all CAF projects work. If there are persons within the wing interested in maintaining and operating the aircraft, then it will be assigned. The only thing the wing has to do is prove that it can support the aircraft's operation costs. Thus, you are right, the larger aircraft tend to go to the larger wings, but that is a fact of life - bigger planes cost more to operate, however it's not the rich folks necessarily who get them, it's the wings with sufficient sponsorship base to raise the funds to keep the plane flying. At the same time, the sale of the aircraft went directly to the Wisconsin Wing with the express limitation that the funds be used only for the acquisition and operation or restoration of a new aircraft, the same as it is for every acquisition by the CAF.

The PV2 is a large and complex aircraft to operate. I am not wholly surprised that it was unable to find sufficient support within a wing for them to request it. It's minimum qualifications are as high (and possibly higher) than those for units operating the C-47s or the R4D, so the pool of potential pilots is greatly lessened by that simple fact and there's no monetary issue in that, it's simply one of experience. HQ will not assign an aircraft to a wing which is unable to financially or operationally support an aircraft. If they did, the CAF would cease to exist as an operating entity very quickly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: PV-2D
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 12:17 am
Posts: 741
Location: Burleson, Tx
Chris
Quote:
Hay Alan, Is the TBM the same one the was parked out by the Mauler a few years ago at Airsho?

Chris, thanks for asking, but it is not the same a/c. The TBM I am referring to is the fourth TBM owned by the CAF, Bn 91426, N-40402, currently at Hagerstown, Md.
Image

Ober, probably as bad as we wanted a Wing or Squadron to take on the 'Poon, I would venture that 30K (maybe less) in sponsorship money would have gotten that a/c assigned.. On the second question, as I understand the rules, proceeds from the sale of aircraft are placed back into the Aircraft Acquisition Fund. Old Shep and Doug are in a better position to elaborate if they wish......Alan

_________________
Just call me Al.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:41 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:21 pm
Posts: 1329
Location: Dallas TX
CAPFlyer wrote:
the sale of the aircraft went directly to the Wisconsin Wing with the express limitation that the funds be used only for the acquisition and operation or restoration of a new aircraft, the same as it is for every acquisition by the CAF.


Bingo. In this case, the monies from the sale of the Harpoon were set aside specifically for the acquisition of an aircraft FOR the WI wing. I believe they are in the market for an L-5 (I like their taste in aircraft 8) ). A smaller aircraft, like an L-Bird, PT, BT etc., are what many smaller units seek because they are cheaper (notice I dont say "cheap" but cheapER) to maintain and operate, and the unit still has an asset to rally its troops around.

_________________
Taylor Stevenson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:27 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4428
Location: Maypearl, Texas
CAPFlyer wrote:
You don't seem to understand how the CAF works. There was no money required to be paid to anyone to get the aircraft assigned, only a project plan in place to get the airplane back flying again. That is how all CAF projects work. If there are persons within the wing interested in maintaining and operating the aircraft, then it will be assigned. The only thing the wing has to do is prove that it can support the aircraft's operation costs. Thus, you are right, the larger aircraft tend to go to the larger wings, but that is a fact of life - bigger planes cost more to operate, however it's not the rich folks necessarily who get them, it's the wings with sufficient sponsorship base to raise the funds to keep the plane flying. At the same time, the sale of the aircraft went directly to the Wisconsin Wing with the express limitation that the funds be used only for the acquisition and operation or restoration of a new aircraft, the same as it is for every acquisition by the CAF.

The PV2 is a large and complex aircraft to operate. I am not wholly surprised that it was unable to find sufficient support within a wing for them to request it. It's minimum qualifications are as high (and possibly higher) than those for units operating the C-47s or the R4D, so the pool of potential pilots is greatly lessened by that simple fact and there's no monetary issue in that, it's simply one of experience. HQ will not assign an aircraft to a wing which is unable to financially or operationally support an aircraft. If they did, the CAF would cease to exist as an operating entity very quickly.


Yeah Ober, What he said... :wink:

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:54 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Lynn..................Oh yeah what Alan said. Just trying to get the truth out finally, although I heard closer to 40K. Brings up the next question how much did the sale bring to whoever gets the money. Lets see do I pay 30K to be able to work on someone elses' plane that I can never own, or pay X to own it and do whatever I want to do with it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:42 am
Posts: 450
Obergrafeter wrote:
Lets see do I pay 30K to be able to work on someone elses' plane that I can never own, or pay X to own it and do whatever I want to do with it?

Now I think you got how the CAF works. For a $10K sponsorship you may qualify to fly a fighter that you couldn't afford to own.

_________________
Image
Blue Skies,
Doug


www.cavanaughflightmuseum.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:42 am
Posts: 450
It's not that they don't last when used. They don't last if they sit. The engines have only had a few hours on them in the last 5 years. The one broke a rod.

_________________
Image
Blue Skies,
Doug


www.cavanaughflightmuseum.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:40 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3414
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
FG1D Pilot wrote:
Obergrafeter wrote:
Lets see do I pay 30K to be able to work on someone elses' plane that I can never own, or pay X to own it and do whatever I want to do with it?

Now I think you got how the CAF works. For a $10K sponsorship you may qualify to fly a fighter that you couldn't afford to own.


Although, under the CAF rules, you don't necessarily have to put up any money to qualify to fly the aircraft even though that is typically the best way to ensure a chance. There are ways (and CAF pilots out there) who have the experience needed but not the funds and because of a shortage of qualified pilots fly the aircraft.

BTW, I think that the number of aircraft with a flying sponsorship over $5K is very limited. I don't even think the R4D is over that for a flying sponsorship. But we've got plenty of flying sponsors who don't have the qualifications (or desire) to fly, so that gives non-flying sponsor pilots an opprotunity to fly the airplane.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:52 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Only $3,500 to sponsor either the B-24 or B-29.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:55 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Now I see how it works, pay 10k to fly a bitching already going hot rod or 30k for a broke down fix it yourself bird. I keep on this site I knew I would get all the answers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:27 pm
Posts: 410
Location: Atlanta,suburb(Ga04)Georgia
Obergrafeter wrote:
Now I see how it works, pay 10k to fly a bitching already going hot rod or 30k for a broke down fix it yourself bird. I keep on this site I knew I would get all the answers.


Don’t forget taxes, insurance, hangar rent and maintenance plus the 30K for the project!

Steve

_________________
"Any excuse is good enough if you're willing to use it!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:50 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:21 pm
Posts: 1329
Location: Dallas TX
Obergrafeter wrote:
Now I see how it works, pay 10k to fly a bitching already going hot rod or 30k for a broke down fix it yourself bird. I keep on this site I knew I would get all the answers.


You seem a bit stubborn, ober :? . I am curious as to where you are getting this 30K figure? We have NO aircraft sponsorships over 10k. If you are talking about a wing having to pay 30k to HQ to get a flying aircraft or project, then that plane or project must already have a negative balance. It has happened many times where a wing or sponsor group takes on a project thats too big for them. They go in debt and cant pay it off, thus leaving it to HQ to handle. HQ then puts it up for assignment and any wing or group of sponsors who wants that aircraft must pay off the negative balance before taking the aircraft. Do you really expect HQ to pay off this debt? A common misconception is that HQ has tons of $$$... not true. It is a big job keeping the insurance and utilities paid for alone. So, if a group of individuals is serious about the aircraft up for assignment, then it is up to them to raise the $$$ needed to get it out of debt. Otherwise if an aircraft up for assignment with an even or better account, then there is no charge to my knowledge that is needed to get the aircraft assigned. Just a proposal, and shipping arrangements.

_________________
Taylor Stevenson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:14 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Stubborn, old and ugly ...thats' me. I didn't say 30k, that came from Alan, although not being from Wisconsin I can't figure how there could be a negative balance at hqs when the Wisconsin Wing purchased the aircraft to begin with. Maybe there were some loans that weren't repaid, it could happen. Just one of those things that makes you go hmmmmm!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:03 am
Posts: 958
Location: Creve Couer, MO
Doug,

What's the status of the Sea Fury? All good? Just curious if it got all sorted out.

Are you putting some time on the SPAD?

Eric


http://www.courtesyaircraft.com/N71GB%2 ... %20Sec.htm

_________________
Eric

"I spent most of my money on alcohol, women and skyraiders....and the rest of it I just wasted."


Last edited by EDowning on Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], kalamazookid and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group