Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:29 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:48 pm
Posts: 106
There's already probably 50 offers of donation on this thread. If each person actually ponied up $50, you're already at $2500. I know that is probably a very small number relative to repair costs, but given the very narrow reach of this website I think we can do substantially better. Offering a raffle for a ride? I think we could generate a lot of interest and revenue at $10 per ticket at airshows.

Best wishes on a speedy recovery to you (mentally), and both planes involved.
Chuck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 2:04 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Mr. Greenwood wrote:
Quote:
I have been amazed that I haven't heard a barrage of critisisim. Despite being mostly a bunch of right wing, gun totin, cig smokin, pro war, tatoo wearing, Nascar watching, garlic eatin, nose wheel flying, Hillary hatin, W votin,misspellin, T-28 lovin, onion breath, rasslin fans (that's about all I can think of, help me out) WIX folks have been nice.
PS. Forrest cuttin,Carbon using, SUV drivin, global warming disbelieving! See Jack, I can write it but my heart's not really in it.


I just hadn't gotten around to you yet

Mudge the right wing, gun totin', cig smokin, pro war, tatoo wearing, Nascar watching, garlic eatin', nose wheel flying, Hillary hatin, W votin', misspellin', T-28 lovin', onion breath, rasslin' fan, forest cuttin', carbon using, SUV drivin', global warming disbelieving

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 4:24 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:39 pm
Posts: 1817
Location: Irving, Texas
"the phone rang at 3:10 am with someone trying to buy the plane"

Well what time of the early morning would you like us to call? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:19 am
Posts: 429
Location: new York
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_i ... 0589&key=1

the preliminary ntsb report is out. seems pretty clear cut, and an unavoidable risk when you land old, blind (in the landing configuration) aircraft together on one runway.

if i were bill, that report would make me feel a lot better . . .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 2:33 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Bill...Sounds to me like there wasn't a lot of "avoiding" you could have accomplished. If the Hurri driver admits to crossing the center line into "your" space.

Mudge the relieved :D

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 6:09 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:36 am
Posts: 1202
Sounds like the Hurricane was at fault. I'd assume that holds up (which doens't mean it really will hold up in court or in the friendly hands of your insurance carrier) Bill should get the Spit fixed without a lot of trouble.

Now its time to figure out all the damages........

Mark H

PS: Of course if they don't want to pay, then time to call in the lawyers.

_________________
Fly safe or you get to meet me .......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 8:13 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
skybolt2003 wrote:
the preliminary ntsb report is out. seems pretty clear cut....


P51Mstg wrote:
Sounds like the Hurricane was at fault


Mudge wrote:
Bill...Sounds to me like there wasn't a lot of "avoiding" you could have accomplished. If the Hurri driver admits to crossing the center line into "your" space.



I can't believe you guys are rushing so quick to judgement. A preliminary report is just that - preliminary. A LOT of things can change between that and the final report. Also, just because a pilot says a brake failed, doesn't necessarily mean it did. It must be tested and inspected. Did he improperly use the brake? How many hours of Hurricane time did he have and could it have impacted his familiarity with the braking system? Did the Hurricane pilot make a radio call to indicate that he had crossed the runway centerline? That could affect assessment of blame. What was briefed at the formation briefing? What were the ROE's regarding sequencing and separation of landing aircraft? These are just a few examples of the many answers we don't have. There are many, many factors involved here, so we must be very careful not to make a rush to judgement. Let's wait the year or so it takes for the final report to come out before assessing fault (if there is any).

P51Mstg wrote:
Sounds like the Hurricane was at fault. I'd assume that holds up (which doens't mean it really will hold up in court or in the friendly hands of your insurance carrier) Bill should get the Spit fixed without a lot of trouble.
Now its time to figure out all the damages........

Mark H

PS: Of course if they don't want to pay, then time to call in the lawyers.


Again, don't rush to judgement. Also, even if it IS the Hurricane pilot's fault (and I'm not necessarily saying it was), it might not matter and may not pay for Bill's repairs. Case in point, Oshkosh 99, Howard vs. Doc in the Bearcat/Corsair collision. Who's fault was it and who got to pay?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 9:22 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 1:08 pm
Posts: 2993
Location: Bunker Hill, WV
Warbird1...you sound like you might be a lawyer. EXCUSE US for using a, seemingly, "official" US Government report to base our posts on.

Mudge the contrite

_________________
Land of the free because of the brave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 11:09 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
*slaps Mudge*
take THAT, youse! :P

I can't believe they would put an inexperienced pilot in the cockpit of that hurri at an airshow. I'm willing to take his word as evidence that the brake failed. I am crossing my fingers and hope that Bill's repairs find funding, HOWEVER it occurs. I'm sorry for the Hurri pilot, and especially for the Lone Star fellas (even if I AM from Louisiana and am supposed to hate all Taxans.) Despite the common American need to place blame, I think it's entirely possible that this really was just one of those things that happens in life, and that the brakes DID fail due to unforseen circumstance, and we shold all basically just be happy nobody got hurt, aside from Bill's nose, which we all know won't be noticed (just kidding Bill)

My offer still stands, Bill. I'm sure everyone ELSE who offreed support would say the same. FEEL THE HOPE, FELLA! And don't let this ground you.

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 11:17 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Mudge wrote:
Warbird1...you sound like you might be a lawyer. EXCUSE US for using a, seemingly, "official" US Government report to base our posts on.


You're going to the bank on "Official" Preliminary? :shock:

Quote:
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors.


Just because someone gets a traffic ticket after an accident doesn't mean that they are 100% at fault.

How about the mechanic that might be responsible for the brake failure? Did the pilot ensure he had good brakes before he took off or did he take off with a known defect? Did the brake hose fail because it was defective from the hose manufacturer? Maybe the contractor built the runway outside of FAA specs with too much/too little of a crown? Could errors or omissions in the briefing have been a causal factor? Maybe an incorrect or improper landing clearance from the tower or airboss?

Fault will be certain when the checks clear at the bank, which could be years away. I hope not, but it is possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 11:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 10:32 am
Posts: 179
Location: Cambridge, ON
The idea of a raffle for a ride sounds like a good idea, however if I recall correctly, isn't there a very strict weight restriction which would make something like that nearly impossible?

I'd be happy to contribute anything I could spare, I'd love to see her flying some day, and so far I haven't had that chance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 11:29 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
bdk wrote:
Mudge wrote:
Warbird1...you sound like you might be a lawyer. EXCUSE US for using a, seemingly, "official" US Government report to base our posts on.


You're going to the bank on "Official" Preliminary? :shock:

Quote:
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors.


Just because someone gets a traffic ticket after an accident doesn't mean that they are 100% at fault.

How about the mechanic that might be responsible for the brake failure? Did the pilot ensure he had good brakes before he took off or did he take off with a known defect? Did the brake hose fail because it was defective from the hose manufacturer? Maybe the contractor built the runway outside of FAA specs with too much/too little of a crown? Could errors or omissions in the briefing have been a causal factor? Maybe an incorrect or improper landing clearance from the tower or airboss?

Fault will be certain when the checks clear at the bank, which could be years away. I hope not, but it is possible.


you, sir, are messing with my zen. :x
*shakes fist*

I'm headed to NorCal sooner than I thought. You ever make it up there let me know.

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 10:02 am
Posts: 361
Speaking of lawyers and checks, it is fortunate for all that this incident didn't happen in Houston. There would be 30 to 40 folk laying out there on the runway with various injuries sustained during the 2 seat accident. It's the only place where I've seen a bus accident and people get ON the bus. "Out of Service bus accident injures 732!" is the headline. :P

Still waiting for marching orders Bill, but you're going to have to get your own cell phone :lol:

Chunks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 12:29 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
C'mon folks. Blame is, IMHO, irrelevant.

Anyone here want to believe that either of the pilots or the aircraft crews were deliberately or knowingly negligent?

Anyone want to believe that either aircraft was operated with an intent to take unreasonable risks with the aircraft, crew or audience?

Anyone here not want to see both aircraft back in the air, with the least cost distress and incontinence* to the operators?

If there is anyone of that mindset, the door's open, please use it.

I, like many others, feel for Bill and the Lone Star team. I'm 100% certain that neither pilot or maintainence crew intended to take risks or shortcuts whatever actually happened.

We are all quick to sound off about the venality of lawyers and insurance companies and their rapaciousness and lack of support of their 'customers' at other times; here, clearly it's in no one's interest to do anything but try and sort the problem's results out as quickly, cheaply and cooperatively as possible.

It's been a poor year's start for vintage aircraft safety with accidents all over the world; but thankfully injury and death as a result has been a lot less - so far. The lesson clearly is we still need to try harder to prevent accidents, and it's adequately been demonstrated already in 2008 that no-one's able to assume they're 'safe'.

Like many others I'd love to see both aircraft back where they belong; and I'd also be happy to help, if I can, with that. That's the objective, not playground level blame-games dressed up as adult behaviour.

Your mileage may vary.

*Should be 'inconvenience', but I'd have wet myself, at the bill if not the accident, so I'll let it stand. ;)

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 07, 2008 2:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:03 am
Posts: 958
Location: Creve Couer, MO
After reading the various posts related to the incident I have a few thoughts.

First, and most importantly, I am glad no one was injured and I wish the best to everyone involved. It could happen to any of us at any time.

Second, the generousity of the people on WIX is unmatched. The various offers and fund raising ideas are very noble.

Third, the need to raise money for airshow participants to repair their own aircraft should as a general rule be unnecessary. Hull insurance is available for the various airframes. It is expensive and has high deductibles, but available. Several of my fellow warbird owners have taken me to task for "wasting money" on hull insurance over the last few years, telling me that spending 20-25k a year for hull, means that I will "rebuy" the aircraft over several years. The fact is, that I can't really afford to properly self insure all of my aircraft so I buy the hull coverage and put 50k-75k aside for the deductible. The other option is to self insure, but if one decides to go that route and then you can't afford the repairs, you have to be prepared to part with the airframe. Frankly, if one can't afford to fully maintain, manage and insure (commercially or self), you shouldn't have it in the first place.

Fourth, the greatest financial danger lies in the liability part of the equation. I have a million dollar limit because that's all that's available for purchase at any cost. I would gladly pay for a 3-5 million dollar limit if it were made available. With the value of the other airframes I can easily see a scenario where the maximum liability is exceeded. God only knows what happens if you hurt a person. How can you put a value on that? (and yes I know, that an attorney can come up with a value).

There is much to be learned from any incident. I have been fortunate enough to learn from others as well as my own.

Once again, I wish the best for those involved in this mishap and hope that whoever is involved in the inevitable incidents later this season are equally as lucky.

Eric

_________________
Eric

"I spent most of my money on alcohol, women and skyraiders....and the rest of it I just wasted."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bradburger and 261 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group