Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:47 am
Forgotten Field wrote:#1 No excuse, no excuse, no excuse... Yeah, kids, wives and actually making money get in the way of building airplanes.
Dan K wrote:#1 John S. is correct: No excuses! I'm married (with children), 12-hour workday, mortgage, ad nauseum. This is your passion that we're talking about here! No excuses!
Forgotten Field wrote:#2 Monthly/yearly volunteers are just as good as daily volunteers.
Dan K wrote:#2 I have lived in places close to organizations involved in historic aircraft preservation and in places not so close. Even if one does live close by, there is no guarantee that the organization will be a particularly volunteer-friendly one. The rising price of fuel makes long-distance commuting distasteful.
Forgotten Field wrote:#3 and other un-constructive comments.
Forgotten Field wrote:I've been in some of the hardest fraternal organizations to join and prosper in, and can say that the typical approach to vetting people can be abused (some people think junior people are not around to be trained, and only serve the menial chores list, and forget that someone at some point actually may have taken the time to personally teach them something). At some point, they have to let you be trusted.
Forgotten Field wrote:Another point is that I think we really would benefit from a 5-7 day course like the one Flying Tigers used to put on at Kissimmee which went over the basics of aircraft restoration. I'd like to hear from someone who attended/taught that course about if it was effective or not in training people up.
Dan K wrote:#3 I believe an effective way to "break the ice" as a new warbird rebuild project volunteer is to be able to walk through the hangar door with some mechanical/electrical/cosmetic repair skills already under your belt.
Forgotten Field wrote:Mike, the only other thing I can say is that we need you and I hope you find a spot for doing what you're interested in. If you can't find a spot, make one at home and gather people around you to do the same thing.
Dan K wrote:Now, other than convincing your spouse that this will be the greatest idea since buttered bread, how else may we help you get started?
Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:22 am
Tue Oct 18, 2005 7:56 am
Broken-Wrench wrote:If you want to make friends don't call mechanics metal bashers and wrench turners. Mental pictures of mindless cavemen with clubs come to mind
Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:04 am
Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:42 am
Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:28 am
Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:56 am
I have not experienced an obviously non-volunteer friendly environment, and if I ever did I wouldn't be there for long.
Forgotten Field wrote:
#3 and other un-constructive comments.
Excuse me?
Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:17 am
Thu Oct 20, 2005 1:12 pm
John Beyl wrote:Paul,
I apologize to Forgotten Field for getting off-topic but I'm a little confused by one of the points you continue to bring up in several of your posts. On one hand it sounds like you believe only licensed "volunteer mechanics" should be working on Warbirds, and on the other hand you agree with what I've written. I clearly state that it is my belief that you need not be a licensed mechanic to work on these aircraft to do high quality work, however a license holder must be present to inspect and sign off the completed work. I believe the FAR's support this with the caveat that the work be carried out under the supervision of, and be inspected and signed off by a licensed A&P, IA or both when required. Understand that most if not all museums could not fly their airplanes to the extent they currently do without the help of high quality unlicensed mechanics and fabricators.
Not picking, just looking for clarity in whatever point you are attempting to make. If you feel I'm in error, that’s fine...we will agree to disagree!
John
Thu Oct 20, 2005 2:14 pm
Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:33 pm
Forgotten Field wrote:Hey Paul,
Good answer. Now how about taking a stab at this- what makes a perfect volunteer (in a maintenance sense)?
Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:01 pm