Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:55 am
gary1954 wrote::lol:I'm sorry, I thought it was a highly modified rickshaw
Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:13 am
Wildchild wrote:gary1954 wrote::lol:I'm sorry, I thought it was a highly modified rickshaw
A Mig 9 IS a highly modified rickshaw![]()
![]()
Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:56 am
Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:05 pm
JohnB wrote:What's in the Pratt & Whitney crates?
Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:18 pm
JohnB wrote:What's in the Pratt & Whitney crates?
Tue Jul 14, 2015 1:47 am
Wildchild wrote:Warbird Kid wrote:What the heck is this thing?
MiG 9
One of only 3 known to have survived
Tue Jul 14, 2015 7:47 am
Tue Jul 14, 2015 11:01 am
Vagabond wrote:Where in Russia is the MiG-9?
Tue Jul 14, 2015 11:16 am
Aahz wrote:EDIT: Moderators, I just realized after the fact that I was posting in an old thread. My apologies for that. If possible, could you spin off my post as a new thread on "A Fourth MiG-9?" so that any follow-on discussion would be on-topic? Thanks!
Tue Jul 14, 2015 11:20 am
airnutz wrote:Aahz wrote:EDIT: Moderators, I just realized after the fact that I was posting in an old thread. My apologies for that. If possible, could you spin off my post as a new thread on "A Fourth MiG-9?" so that any follow-on discussion would be on-topic? Thanks!
I understand your concern about being off-topic, but I'm curious as to why being an old thread is a concern? After reading Brit, Oz and NZ forums for years it's common for folks resurrecting old threads with new info to apologize for doing so. I always thought it was a quality trait of the commonwealther's to be as good as they are in their attempts to provide a thorough history of their subject...no matter how long it took to assemble the story. It's a lot nicer to have all the goodies in one place rather than chasing all the bits 'round the archives....No worries...just sayin'....
Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:46 pm
Tue Jul 14, 2015 4:56 pm
airnutz wrote:As I noted, I see your dilemma on the off-topic aspect. You could live dangererously AND post a new thread on the 4th MiG-9 with a link back to this page in order to get all the photos in perspective. Regardless Aahz, nice catch on the -9 and welcome to WIX!
An oddity in the WIX search feature..when you query the search with MiG-9, it replies no such animal has been discussed.
Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:01 pm
Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:35 pm
Tiger Tim wrote:It may have been discussed before but is that a B-25 nacelle in the upper left of the parking lot pic? It's not, like, from one of those Mitchell's, is it?
Tue Jul 14, 2015 11:01 pm
Aahz wrote:airnutz wrote:Aahz wrote:EDIT: Moderators, I just realized after the fact that I was posting in an old thread. My apologies for that. If possible, could you spin off my post as a new thread on "A Fourth MiG-9?" so that any follow-on discussion would be on-topic? Thanks!
I understand your concern about being off-topic, but I'm curious as to why being an old thread is a concern? After reading Brit, Oz and NZ forums for years it's common for folks resurrecting old threads with new info to apologize for doing so. I always thought it was a quality trait of the commonwealther's to be as good as they are in their attempts to provide a thorough history of their subject...no matter how long it took to assemble the story. It's a lot nicer to have all the goodies in one place rather than chasing all the bits 'round the archives....No worries...just sayin'....
Well, good - being new here, I didn't want to ruffle feathers right off the bat. Plus, since the thread started on the P-61, I didn't know if it might be better to have a separate thread for the discovery and documentation of a fourth MiG-9, which would seem to be a big deal.