quemerford wrote:
Quote removed by Scott WRG Editor
Apologies if I missed a post, but is this definitely what happened?
A shame if so: my experience of similar copyright/attribution issues is that often the owner of a hard-copy photo will claim they have ownership of an image, despite it obviously being attributable elsewhere. I do try to provide credit where it is available, and in cases where my own photos (that is, photos that I took myself) have been used without credit, I either get on with life and get over it, or more commonly, enjoy the fact that someone liked it enough to use it themselves.
So let's hope that these images can be re-posted, though I imagine it's a thankless task, and nigh-on impossible to sort out credits, for no real reward.
That is absolutely
not what happened.
It had nothing to do with copyright infringement or harassment from other forum members, as alleged by the cursing poster above.
I followed the topic and Mark disagreed with some comments in the TIGHAR thread, and was unable to follow advice from others to just
let it go. In internet forum terminology, it was a classic case of someone taking their ball and going home which we've all seen countless times.
Marks photo contributions were appreciated, but nobody can change another person's convictions.