Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 4:04 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 505
Location: Australia
Ive heard at times that CAF maybe or some US owner may in future get a chance to buy a B-52 to restore or if still flying.

Id prefer a B-52D as they are the real combat bird that deserve to be flown again.

Anyone think a B-52D flying is a goer?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:29 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
She would be expensive, but I don't see why it could be done. Although with the USAF still flying the type, not many airshows would pay the CAF to bring one in that they could get for free by just asking the USAF.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 701
Location: Dallas / Midland TX
Short answer: No way in hell. The U.S. gov would never let a post cold war stategic bomber be flown in civilian hands. I doubt even the Collings foundation could pull it off. Besides to be considered a "warbird" it would have to be something not currently being flown by the USAF, and that might be another 50 years......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:52 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
i agree!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:15 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
2 words....."Nuclear Capabilities"

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:24 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
I believe these are also covered by the SALT treaties, aren't they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:05 am
Posts: 972
Location: Mesa, Az
Besides, I'm sure Gary would love to tackle a B-52 after "LIL and "FIFI" are done. For you CAFers, lets figure out ANNUAC. Lets see, $1000 per engine, $1 per horsepower---- never mind!!!!!

_________________
The more I learn about aircraft, the more I realize I still have to learn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Nuc.?
PostPosted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:15 pm
Posts: 241
Location: Midwest US
While I don't think that a civilian B-52 will be in the works for the next fifty years. I don't think that being nucular capable is the reason.

Even with the 'backpack' nucs of the Vietnam war, any aircraft can be considered nucular capable.

And; what would you rather try to track? A low and slow Cesna, or a BIG and obvious B-52?

Joe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:43 am 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
THe CAF already has a nuke capable airplane....

Image


The B-52 would be waaaay too expensive to operate, but it would be cool to see... with some creative sponsorship...

Image

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:36 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
The F-4 and TA-4F are ,...er WERE, I MEAN, WERE, nuclear capable.

That Sabredriver sure does like to kick that anthill ! :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 4:33 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Let's see..........We could take those noisy diesel burning engines off, put some good round engines on there. Maybe a couple of 3350's on the inboard positions, a couple of 2800's just outboard of those. That takes care of the inboard engine pods. We could get an 1820 off a T-28 on each inboard position of the outboard pods so that O.P. would be happy. Naturally, we'd have to put a good engine right next to that 1820 so that it would be reliable...so a couple of 1340's will work there. Naturally, we'd have to use the bomb bays for extra oil tanks and compartments for cleaning supplies though.

So now that I've figured out the engine mods, how can I modify that landing gear system? Hmmmm................................ :wink: :lol:

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:29 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
I just don't ever see it happening. How many countries would love to get ahold of one the world's premier strategic bombers? And a civilian operated BUFF would be way more readily accessible than the military counter-parts.

Besides there won't be any left by the time the USAF finally retires them. I read that through continual refit and upgrade programs the USAF intend to keep the BUFFs in inventory for the next 50 years or so. By that time the remain B-52s will be so maxed out on airframe time. The best bet if at all would be any of the BUFFs mounted on poles or in front of base gates.

Image

Ztex

What's the story with this picture???

Someone been busy photoshop'ing, or what? If so nice job, I did a double take at first glance. :shock: :shock:

Shay
_____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:12 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
It's the old NASA B-52 photoshopped. The picture has been floating around for at least 3-4 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:17 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
who ever tweaked that buff pic must have alot of time on his hands!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:50 pm
Posts: 743
Location: Blue Hills of Virginia
Newbie here, so I will probably pay dearly for this...but, I have heard a rumor that the B-52D at Willow Run is running out of options to be moved, so the Air Farce in it's infinite wisdom is going to scrap it. I'm sure that the guys on here from Yankee Air will know a lot more about that than I...sure would make a nice lawn ornament though :lol:

_________________
Earn my respect and never lose it.
Demand my respect and never gain it. -Me

...just another plane dreamer.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group