Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 4:14 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Privateers status?
PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:55 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
I read on the registry that all privateers are grounded by the FAA? What is the reason? Will this ban be lifted in the future?

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:02 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I think it had something to do with the wingspar. There was a firebomber that came apart due to this reason.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:31 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
How come this doesn't affect B-24's? Different wing design?

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:14 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Quote:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-NM-164-AD; Amendment 39-13292; AD 2003-18-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Dynamics (Convair) Model P4Y-2 Airplanes, General
Dynamics (Consolidated-Vultee) (Army) Model LB-30 Airplanes, and General Dynamics
(Consolidated) (Army) Model C-87A Airplanes

Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule

Since the issuance of that AD, the FAA has received inquiries concerning the applicability of the
AD. The commenters indicate that the applicability of the AD, as published, contains a phrase that
could lead the reader to believe that the AD applies to all former military surplus aircraft, rather than
just those airplanes specifically called out by model in the AD.
We agree that using the phrase ''including, but not limited to, all of the following surplus military
airplanes'' in the applicability of the existing AD may be misleading; therefore, we have clarified the
applicability of this new AD by removing that phrase. We also have revised the applicability to retain
only those airplane models for which a U.S. type certificate has been issued: General Dynamics
(Consolidated-Vultee) (Army) Model LB-30 airplanes, and General Dynamics (Convair) Model P4Y-
2 airplanes. Additionally, this AD adds a new airplane model, General Dynamics (Consolidated)
(Army) Model C-87A airplanes, to the applicability of this AD. Other models specified in the
existing AD have been removed from the applicability of this new AD.

Explanation of Requirements of Rule

Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of the same type design, this AD supersedes AD 2003-08-13 to continue to require repetitive
inspections to find fatigue cracks in the lower rear cap of the wing front spar, front spar web, and
lower skin of the wings; repair or replacement of any cracked part with a new part; and follow-on
inspections at new intervals. As specified above, this AD clarifies and revises the applicability of the
existing AD to add another airplane model and remove certain other airplane models.

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_an ... 031801.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:25 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Thanks for that copy BDK. I was just going through some stuff looking for that.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 8:47 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3294
Location: Phoenix, Az
I have some photos of the cracks that they are talking about from the 4Ys up in Greybull. After reading the AD, did the CAF do the inspection to Diamond Lil ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 4:18 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Matt Gunsch wrote:
After reading the AD, did the CAF do the inspection to Diamond Lil ?


You betcha!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DH82EH, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Warbird Kid and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group