Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Nov 22, 2025 9:56 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Mustang Rudder Question
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:07 pm
Posts: 620
Location: S. Texas
I have had this question asked of me dozens of times and I truely do not know the answer...........nor have I found anyone that does.

Why is the rudder on the P-51D (maybe the others too) the only dope and fabric part of the entire aircraft?

Help me out here, so I can answer truthfully instead of making things up (they don't know the answer so they believe anything told to them :D ).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:34 pm
Posts: 187
Location: NW Mississippi
It has always been my impression that it was due to control surface balance. Most aircraft up to that time had fabric control surfaces. The rudder is the most critical (flutter) and is balanced during the silver dope application. Checked, rechecked and final check before painting.

Sully


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:07 pm
Posts: 620
Location: S. Texas
Sully wrote:
It has always been my impression that it was due to control surface balance. Most aircraft up to that time had fabric control surfaces. The rudder is the most critical (flutter) and is balanced during the silver dope application. Checked, rechecked and final check before painting.

Sully


And you left out a final balance after paint application as this is the most important step.

All flight control surfaces are (should be) removed from the aircraft during painting and balanced before re-installation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:34 pm
Posts: 187
Location: NW Mississippi
I wasn't going to go that far but yes.

Sully


Last edited by Sully on Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:53 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:55 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
mustanglover wrote:
I have had this question asked of me dozens of times and I truely do not know the answer...........nor have I found anyone that does.

Why is the rudder on the P-51D (maybe the others too) the only dope and fabric part of the entire aircraft?

Help me out here, so I can answer truthfully instead of making things up (they don't know the answer so they believe anything told to them :D ).

All Mustangs up to and including the early D models had fabric elevators as well.
They were later replaced with metalized units as the fabric would induce pitching of the nose up and down at high speeds.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:32 pm
Posts: 697
Location: KBLI
51fixer wrote:
All Mustangs up to and including the early D models had fabric elevators as well.
They were later replaced with metalized units as the fabric would induce pitching of the nose up and down at high speeds.
Rich


You beat me to it.

I also seem to recall some experiments with metalized rudders in the 50's?.

_________________
"They can teach MONKEYS to fly better than that"

http://www.heritageflight.org
http://www.bravo369.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:07 pm
Posts: 620
Location: S. Texas
That still begs an answer to the original question.

Why is the rudder left as being the only dope and fabric part on the airplane?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:45 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11330
mustanglover wrote:
That still begs an answer to the original question.

Why is the rudder left as being the only dope and fabric part on the airplane?
Rudder is a lot longer. Maybe it required too much weight to balance (overloaded the existing hinge design)?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:38 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
mustanglover wrote:
That still begs an answer to the original question.

Why is the rudder left as being the only dope and fabric part on the airplane?

It seemed to be the design philosophy of that time to have the controls be fabric covered. They were light, easy to repair and didn't use critical materials (alum) for the covering.
Different companies had there own ways. Republic and Lockheed metalized. NAA, Grumman, Vought used fabric or a combination of materials. Corsair ailerons were fabric covering over a wooden structure on all models as I recall.
As the speeds increase the next generation moved to all metal.
I believe Cavalier had an STC to metalize the P-51 rudders. I think it was only done to one. The H model had a metal rudder. I believe Whittington's Precious Metal had a H vertical and a metal Rudder on a D.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:23 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
The farther away weight is from the Centre of Gravity the more profound its effect on Weight and Balance and therefore handling.
And range is better with "lighter" anywhere you can ADD it.
I always thought that was the whole reason for staying fabric.
Interesting about the elevators starting out fabric, but being changed to metal later.

And I could ALMOST buy the theory on strategic material shortages keeping the rudder fabric, but not the elevators due to flight characteristics.

Dang you guys is purty durned bright! Or good BSers! :lol:
SPANNER the humbled

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
SPANNERmkV wrote:
The farther away weight is from the Centre of Gravity the more profound its effect on Weight and Balance and therefore handling.
And range is better with "lighter" anywhere you can ADD it.
I always thought that was the whole reason for staying fabric.
Interesting about the elevators starting out fabric, but being changed to metal later.

And I could ALMOST buy the theory on strategic material shortages keeping the rudder fabric, but not the elevators due to flight characteristics.

Dang you guys is purty durned bright! Or good BSers! :lol:
SPANNER the humbled


This is a no BS zone.

Even the last of the WWII Navy fighters had fabric all around including the flaps. That being the Bearcat.
As to weight difference between fabric and Alum I don't think it is much. The USAAC Tech Order which pertains to changing the elevators on the P-51 has you remove the balance weight from the fabric elevator and install it on the metal one. The TO doesn't specify a rebalance though IIRC.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Indiantown, FL
The overbalance and underbalance limits are spelled out in the SRM.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: P-51 Elevators
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 6:28 pm
Posts: 192
If I remember correctly, Twilight Tear (TFC's version) has fabric covered elevators.

Is there a STC to metalise the fabric ones. I assume they are approved for use today.

George

_________________
BURMA! Sorry, I panicked


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: P-51 Elevators
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:12 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
chippie51 wrote:
If I remember correctly, Twilight Tear (TFC's version) has fabric covered elevators.

Is there a STC to metalise the fabric ones. I assume they are approved for use today.

George

I believe some of the structure is shared between both types. You make or purchase whatever is different (ribs, trailing edge and skins) and rebuild them. You need a fixture to keep it straight. You also should have the blue prints so the completed part matches the original design.
As the parts are already a part of the original design and listed in the manuals it is not a modification of the aircraft. An STC shouldn't be needed but probably a Form 337 would.
There is the Type Certificate which specifies the aircraft should incorporate all the Tech Order changes. Technically for a Limited Category registered P-51 they should have metal covered elevators.
Fabric elevator P/N is 73-22001, metal is 122-2201. They fit either side. Same balance weight and trim tab is used.
Rich


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 76 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group