Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 11:01 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 4:42 am
Posts: 540
Location: UK
I had a look at his latest book in the bookshop

"I Know You Got Soul by Jeremy Clarkson

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASI ... 53-1807627

In it he discusses great machines.. But he leaves the Spitfire to last..

His last sentence

"probably the greatest machine ever built"

I can't argue with that.. Though I know a few yanks who will!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 1:03 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
Aesthetically pleasing machine? Certainly the Spitfire/Seafire ranks high.

GREATEST machine ever? I think one would need to ask the pilot who is swinging beneath a parachute, his Spitfire augering earthward due to a tiny glycol leak; while the round-motored flier returns home to warm bed and shower, even though his craft has a couple of cylinders completely shot away.

Round rules. Pointy drools. :wink:

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 2:09 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
Col. Rohr wrote:

Besides we all know that the Spitfire is a overgrown Ultra-Light :twisted:

Cheers The Col.


Oh crud....

I'll be in the bomb shelter if anyone needs me :lol:

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 2:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 44
Location: London/Kent border U.K.
Dan K wrote:
Aesthetically pleasing machine? Certainly the Spitfire/Seafire ranks high.

GREATEST machine ever? I think one would need to ask the pilot who is swinging beneath a parachute, his Spitfire augering earthward due to a tiny glycol leak; while the round-motored flier returns home to warm bed and shower, even though his craft has a couple of cylinders completely shot away.

Round rules. Pointy drools. :wink:


So, the Fairey Swordfish is the greatest machine ever :wink: :partyman:

_________________
Volunteer - The Shoreham Aircraft Museum

Member - The Battle of Britain Historical Society


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 106
Location: Bedfordshire UK
Col. Rohr wrote:
[The Greatest airplane is anything with a round engine in the front.
Besides we all know that the Spitfire is a overgrown Ultra-Light :twisted:
Cheers The Col.


Robert please,
Although the Spitfire was a great aircraft, all the greatest British warbirds were built by that great British company from Kingston upon Thames in South west London--none other than H.G. Hawker Engineering Ltd.

I give you Hart, Hind, Demon, Nimrod, Osprey, Fury, Hurricane, Typhoon, Tempest, Sea Fury, Hunter, Harrier. Give me another company who's products span that length of time. That little concern from Bethpage, New York comes close but not in front.

Cheers
Andy
PS You didn't expect me not to respond did you??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:16 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
I'm comfortable with the Swordfish as world's greatest. Certainly world's greatest W.W.I a/c in W.W.II :roll: See Warbird Digest Issue II's feature by - gosh- me.. Really? Quelle suprise. (Plug)

Of course RJ Mitchell's greatest was the Walrus... A Mitchell round engined aeroplane dispensing with proper exhausts as well as collant! 8) (Plug: www.mmpbooks.biz - Walrus book by - oh, you spotted the trend?)

Hey, despite the Mustang-only lobby, we can have round and pointy engines (and at Old Warden a half doz more engine shapes too :D )

Jeremy. Hmmm. Having put a EE Lightning in his front yard in Oxfordshire, he got lots of publicity. After the publicity, he got rid of the Lighning, with -ah- lightning speed. Tells you all you need to know, really. Publicity hungry media himbo? Yup. Reliable reporter on technology? Nope.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 106
Location: Bedfordshire UK
JDK wrote:
I'm comfortable with the Swordfish as world's greatest. Certainly world's greatest W.W.I a/c in W.W.II :roll: See Warbird Digest Issue II's feature by - gosh- me.. Really? Quelle suprise. (Plug)

Of course RJ Mitchell's greatest was the Walrus... A Mitchell round engined aeroplane dispensing with proper exhausts as well as collant! 8) (Plug: www.mmpbooks.biz - Walrus book by - oh, you spotted the trend?)

Hey, despite the Mustang-only lobby, we can have round and pointy engines (and at Old Warden a half doz more engine shapes too :D )

Jeremy. Hmmm. Having put a EE Lightning in his front yard in Oxfordshire, he got lots of publicity. After the publicity, he got rid of the Lighning, with -ah- lightning speed. Tells you all you need to know, really. Publicity hungry media himbo? Yup. Reliable reporter on technology? Nope.


Hi James
is there any chance of a 'signed by author' copy of 'The Book of the Pusser's Duck' when I see you on Tuesday?
It'll be be a kind of memento of you after you leave for the ex-penal colony in a couple of weeks.

Cheers
Andy
PS Your lot were lucky I thought at Twickers this afternoon. Don't forget you owe me tenner in advance for next Summer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 2:32 pm
Posts: 118
Location: Northants, UK
I bought Clarkson's book the other day. It's a cracking read. Starts with Concorde, finishes with the Spitfire, with flying boats, 747, B-52, SR-71 and the Space Shuttle in between - a closet spotter if there ever was one.

_________________
Awfully nice aeroplane piccies available


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:16 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
DamienB wrote:
I bought Clarkson's book the other day. It's a cracking read. Starts with Concorde, finishes with the Spitfire, with flying boats, 747, B-52, SR-71 and the Space Shuttle in between - a closet spotter if there ever was one.

...and I bet he wrote every single word all by himself! :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:20 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Col. Rohr wrote:
OK Andy,

How about a little company up in the Pacific Northwest of these USA

Cheers RER

...that hasn't designed a worthwhile military aircraft since the B-52 over 50 years ago. Now the world's second largest producer of aluminium tubes full of seats. I think that's the one, isn't it Andy? :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 106
Location: Bedfordshire UK
Mike wrote:
DamienB wrote:
I bought Clarkson's book the other day. It's a cracking read. Starts with Concorde, finishes with the Spitfire, with flying boats, 747, B-52, SR-71 and the Space Shuttle in between - a closet spotter if there ever was one.

...and I bet he wrote every single word all by himself! :lol: :lol: :lol:


Sometimes Mike I detect a note of cynicism when you post.
I can certainly respect that. :supz: :supz:

Oh and Col Rohr.
Boeings are OK--I like B-17's.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 106
Location: Bedfordshire UK
[quote="Mike...that hasn't designed a worthwhile military aircraft since the B-52 over 50 years ago. Now the world's second largest producer of aluminium tubes full of seats. I think that's the one, isn't it Andy? :wink:[/quote]

Hi Mike
I couldn't bring myself to mention 'the airliner word'--yes fifty years of bus-building.
Cheers
Andy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:29 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Andy in Beds wrote:
Oh and Col Rohr.
Boeings are OK--I like B-17's.

Nasty, noisy, draughty things. That big open window lets all the wind in, very uncomfortable, and the in-flight service sucks. I wouldn't recommend them. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Hawker vs. Grumman
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:30 pm 
Andy I found a webpage that says the first Hawker aircraft, the Woodcock, first flew in 1923. The P.1127, which of course became the Harrier, first flying in 1960 and was also the last official Hawker Engineering design.

As for the Grumman, the first FF-1 flew in 1931. If you only count the Grumman Corporation products, and not the Northrup Grumman products then the last airplane would be the X-29A which first flew in 1985.

Thats 37 years for Hawker before it became a part of BAe to 54 years for Grumman before it became Northrup-Grumman.

Pretty good for both companies I'd say. I'm not sure if there are any two companies for either country that lasted longer.

Ryan


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawker vs. Grumman
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 106
Location: Bedfordshire UK
Ryan Harris wrote:
Andy I found a webpage that says the first Hawker aircraft, the Woodcock, first flew in 1923. The P.1127, which of course became the Harrier, first flying in 1960 and was also the last official Hawker Engineering design.

As for the Grumman, the first FF-1 flew in 1931. If you only count the Grumman Corporation products, and not the Northrup Grumman products then the last airplane would be the X-29A which first flew in 1985.

Thats 37 years for Hawker before it became a part of BAe to 54 years for Grumman before it became Northrup-Grumman.

Pretty good for both companies I'd say. I'm not sure if there are any two companies for either country that lasted longer.

Ryan


Hi Ryan
good post.
I knew Grumman had a long life but I was surprised how long a life it was.
For me personally I can't think of a Grumman design I actually dislike.
The Bearcat has to be a favourite though.
Cheers
Andy


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 279 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group