Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Aug 21, 2025 2:09 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Speaking of Livery!!!
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:42 pm 
The CAF livery question brings a few questions to mind. When, who and what warbird decided to chose a military paint scheme over the civilian paint schemes way back when? And what was the Governments regulations on ex-military aircraft being painted back to military paint schemes. Also are there many warbirds today that are still painted in civilian schemes? Not counting the air racers.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:49 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3257
Location: New York
As long as there have been privately owned warbirds, some of them have been painted in military colors. There isn't any one person who started it.

Some prominent examples from the 1950s, though are Frank Tallman, who kept his warbirds in military colors largely because that was what movie work required, and Ed Maloney, partly for the same reason and partly because he was the first person in the US to get serious about having a flying air museum.

A few aerospace companies in the 1950s operated warbirds as bits of their coporate heritage, e.g. Republic had a P-47 (the razorback now at USAFM), and they were generally in military colors.

My sense is that many Spitfire operators in the UK went with military colors right from the beginning.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 8:18 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
It's a very vague question, understandably! First thing is what's permissible varies from country to country; and I mean both legal and what you might consider culturally acceptable. Certain ideas and things may be legal, but not a good idea - and vice versa.
k5083 wrote:
My sense is that many Spitfire operators in the UK went with military colors right from the beginning.

Good post, August. However, IIRC in the 1950s most, if not all UK ex-military types were in civil schemes. Swordfish and Fulmar were in Fairey colours, the Hawker Hurricane and Tomtit of Hawkers were in civvies (the Hawker Hart went military) and there were several Spitfires privately owned in civil schemes with registrations painted on, from Mk.I, II and the Rolls Royce XIV G-AGLT.

IIRC, today in the UK you need an exemption to paint an aircraft in a military scheme without showing the civil registration. You can, I think paint it as you wish without military markings, but showing the registration. In Australia it's something similar, but they carry the reggo in small under the tail.

Leaving aside the usual "it's mine to do as I wish" statements, ex-military aircraft would normally carry genuine and sometimes still current military identification markings. For that reason, rightly and understandably, most militaries and governments are wary of letting anyone carry those on the private machine. It is like using government headed paper. ;) A good example is the ex-Canadian T-33. I'm reasonably up to date on warbirds, but if Paul turned up in it locally, I wouldn't know it wasn't still a Canadian military operated aircraft. We all know Paul's a real gent, but the chicks need to be aware he's not a nice Canuckian air force pilot, but an unleashed private owner. :D

I've always like a well thought-out civil scheme on a warbird, and the y can look great. G-FIRE and the Flack stable in the UK were one of the latest, greatest examples of that.

HTH

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:48 pm 
Are there photos of those aircraft JDK? ... I'd like to see them.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:14 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Hellcat wrote:
Are there photos of those aircraft JDK? ... I'd like to see them.

Oh, no. :shock:

Yes there are. I'll see what I can do off the cuff on the web.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:42 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Most of what I've got isn't scanned or useable on the web. Here's a handful.

The Fairey operated Swordfish LS326, in Fairey's house colours of Blue and silver, with the Fairey badge on the tail. Should be back in the air this year, we hope, having been flying for many years with the Royal Navy Historic Flight. (My collection.)

Image

A couple of the rare Spitfire TR.8

By the late, great Charles E Brown, in Vickers ownership, I think. Via Peter Arnold.

Image


Later (Via Gordon Riley)

Image

Hawker Hurricane PZ865 'The Last of the Many' as G-AMAU. Royal blue & gold. From the web.

Image

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:57 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
And not forgetting G-FIRE

From Webshots.

Image

And G-FURY

From pbase

Image

Questions on 'what happened' to them can be answered by a moments Googling.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 1:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:03 am
Posts: 958
Location: Creve Couer, MO
You don't see many airplanes, civilian or military, with polka dots.

I'm just sayin..... :shock:

_________________
Eric

"I spent most of my money on alcohol, women and skyraiders....and the rest of it I just wasted."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 259
Location: Addison, Texas
EDowning wrote:
You don't see many airplanes, civilian or military, with polka dots.

I'm just sayin..... :shock:


Except the Forming ships or Circus Leaders of the 8th AF in WW2. Like 'Pete the Pom Inspector'. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 4:31 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4336
Location: Battle Creek, MI
One of Hawkins & Powers' Super Privateers had polka-dots on it at one time. I remember reading a book somewhere that claimed one of the crew slapped them on after consumption of much ethanol-based beverages on a Saturday night. Guess life gets a bit monotonous out in rural Wyoming.. 8)

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:10 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
JDK wrote:
Leaving aside the usual "it's mine to do as I wish" statements, ex-military aircraft would normally carry genuine and sometimes still current military identification markings. For that reason, rightly and understandably, most militaries and governments are wary of letting anyone carry those on the private machine. It is like using government headed paper. ;) A good example is the ex-Canadian T-33. I'm reasonably up to date on warbirds, but if Paul turned up in it locally, I wouldn't know it wasn't still a Canadian military operated aircraft. We all know Paul's a real gent, but the chicks need to be aware he's not a nice Canuckian air force pilot, but an unleashed private owner. :DHTH


Thanks James. First, I've never been associated with a "good example" of anything--that's something my mother always wished for. Second, I'll keep my leash on and try not to confuse the chicks about my freelance aircraft ownership status. :twisted:

I think most folks well versed in aviation would check for the two inch US civil registration numbers/letters near the aircraft's tail feathers. I'm told if I take my airplane to Canada for any air shows I'd have to apply temporary 12 inch registrations numbers/letters so as not to be clearly recognized as an unleashed private owner. :P Anyone know about if this is true?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], MKD1966 and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group