Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 16, 2026 1:41 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: New Flying Tigers Movie
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:39 pm 
Offline
a.k.a. TBDude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:54 pm
Posts: 626
Location: Southern California
Apparently Tom Cruise is developing an AVG film with his "Valkyrie" screenwriter Christopher McQuarrie...

http://www.empireonline.com/news/feed.asp?NID=23911


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:12 pm 
I can already assume what most here will think, but personally I'm not too interested in a WW2 aviation movie that usually relys on incorrect aircraft types if real warbirds are used. Unless this production goes with all CGI and accurate CGI, then you will see incorrect P-40 types used and even if the film is well made, people like me will, all through the film, be reminded of the obvious errors everytime we see a P-40 .... :cry:

BUT!!!!! ..... I'll give it a chance to entertain me .... :wink: :wink:

Mark the film critic


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I can handle the use of P-40E's and a CAF replica Japanese Force. Anything that will bring WWII aviation into the spotlight, and get the veterans more recognition is a good thing. Look at what Saving Private Ryan, Band of Brothers and even Pearl Harbor has done. It got people to get their noses into the books and read, and learn abou tthe heroes of that war.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:28 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:31 pm
Posts: 1356
Location: Galveston County
:?: What's CGI? Thanks! :D

Kurt the uneducated


Hellcat wrote:
I can already assume what most here will think, but personally I'm not too interested in a WW2 aviation movie that usually relys on incorrect aircraft types if real warbirds are used. Unless this production goes with all CGI and accurate CGI, then you will see incorrect P-40 types used and even if the film is well made, people like me will, all through the film, be reminded of the obvious errors everytime we see a P-40 .... :cry:

BUT!!!!! ..... I'll give it a chance to entertain me .... :wink: :wink:

Mark the film critic


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:31 pm 
Pogo wrote:
:?: What's CGI? Thanks! :D

Kurt the uneducated


Hellcat wrote:
I can already assume what most here will think, but personally I'm not too interested in a WW2 aviation movie that usually relys on incorrect aircraft types if real warbirds are used. Unless this production goes with all CGI and accurate CGI, then you will see incorrect P-40 types used and even if the film is well made, people like me will, all through the film, be reminded of the obvious errors everytime we see a P-40 .... :cry:

BUT!!!!! ..... I'll give it a chance to entertain me .... :wink: :wink:

Mark the film critic


CGI ... 'Computer Generated Imagery'


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:36 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
There's this thing called Artistic License. Artists can use it to overcome problems or to create situations that wouldn't normally exist among other things. I wasn't impressed with the Star Wars type CGI flying of The Film That Won't Be Named but the initials are PH. Maybe a better director would overcome that. I know there aren't enough genuine early P-40s to make a good movie so use E's or N's or whatever.

I would be more interested in plot, writing, acting, direction and continuity. If they mix up a few N model Warhawks with E's or C's I don't care. I wonder what they are using for reference and research? There has been a lot of really good research done on the AVG that far surpasses the old propaganda and self serving autobiographies.

I want to see a lot of Julieanne Moore as Olga Greenlaw and I mean a lot.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 7:52 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Don't care about the model of airplanes as long as there P-40s, but please ...please....please not Tom Cruise as "Tex Hill"! About two feet different in height, I will personally bring Masey to Hollywood and put an end to that crap if that is who he wants to play.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:01 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5237
Location: Stratford, CT.
The Production company just has to make some deals with the FHC and Provence Fighter Sales. If they plan ahead, I bet they could get these 2 genuine long nose P-40s, and probably enough E's and N's for background shooting.

Not only that but a few Oscars, some Zeros, and some CGI Mabels and were ready to go! 8)

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:39 pm
Posts: 359
This Flying Tigers movie has been in the works with several different studios/writers (whichever) for at least ten years. I think I first heard about it in high school. I think its awesome that its moving along.

I read today in the Wall Street Journal that the producer of Valkyrie said the CGI budget was used up making Toms fingers dissapear for the remainder of the movie after the P-40 scene left him wounded. They didnt have enough money left to do a CGI P-40, and it was cheaper to get real aircraft out to the desert then CGI them. I found that to be an amazingly awesome excuse to use real aircraft with real sound. CGI will never look right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:30 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:43 pm
Posts: 1454
Location: Colorado
Hellcat wrote:
I can already assume what most here will think, but personally I'm not too interested in a WW2 aviation movie that usually relys on incorrect aircraft types if real warbirds are used. Unless this production goes with all CGI and accurate CGI, then you will see incorrect P-40 types used and even if the film is well made, people like me will, all through the film, be reminded of the obvious errors everytime we see a P-40 .... :cry:

BUT!!!!! ..... I'll give it a chance to entertain me .... :wink: :wink:

Mark the film critic


I much rather see real incorrect P-40s all day long before seeing another CGI aircraft. The CGI aircraft are so hideous I can't imagine why anyone would prefer CGI over the real thing, wrong model or not. I hate CGI aircraft so much I rather watch them ride around on bikes with cards in the spokes making machine guns sounds with their mouths than use CGI aircraft.

Ryan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Posts: 258
Location: california
rwdfresno wrote:
Hellcat wrote:
I can already assume what most here will think, but personally I'm not too interested in a WW2 aviation movie that usually relys on incorrect aircraft types if real warbirds are used. Unless this production goes with all CGI and accurate CGI, then you will see incorrect P-40 types used and even if the film is well made, people like me will, all through the film, be reminded of the obvious errors everytime we see a P-40 .... :cry:

BUT!!!!! ..... I'll give it a chance to entertain me .... :wink: :wink:

Mark the film critic


I much rather see real incorrect P-40s all day long before seeing another CGI aircraft. The CGI aircraft are so hideous I can't imagine why anyone would prefer CGI over the real thing, wrong model or not. I hate CGI aircraft so much I rather watch them ride around on bikes with cards in the spokes making machine guns sounds with their mouths than use CGI aircraft.

Ryan


I agree with that one hundred percent, no more of this new age CG crap, Lucas has ruined all the star wars shows from after return of the Jedi with all their cg junk....it looks like a glorified cartoon and is definately not convincing, as is the new indian jones cg show,it sucked....use real planes, do us all a favor...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:01 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I was always easy to get over the wrong model type. I didn't expect the makers of PH to go and build full scale replica and flying B-25B's for the Dolittle Raid. We all get the idea.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:41 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
with all the movie drivel out lately with the exception of the nixon movie, valkryie, & some new squint eastwood movie, a flying tigers flick sounds great!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:08 am
Posts: 563
Location: Copperas Cove Texas
Obergrafeter wrote:
Don't care about the model of airplanes as long as there P-40s, but please ...please....please not Tom Cruise as "Tex Hill"! About two feet different in height, I will personally bring Masey to Hollywood and put an end to that crap if that is who he wants to play.
Hey why not try to get Tommy Lee Jones to play the old man cant think of anybody better that would be suited for that role. kinda looks like him too :wink:

_________________
Always Keep Em Flying !

Glen

Lookie Capt Jim! Wham! Wham! ...............................Termights


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 12:09 am 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:58 am
Posts: 1054
Location: In Your Screen
This will be good for aviation. Think of how much interest this generates in aviation from the public!

I salute Tom Cruise for using his considerable clout to support this.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 100 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group