Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 3:07 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:30 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Australia
Its the holiday season to relax and rest,

so I thought a nice intellectual and stimulating "debating thread" like this might be of interest?

What are the top 5 US manufacturers in terms of number of significant or successful types, volumes of aircraft built, ie the Boeings, North American, Curtiss and Consolidated etc,

BUT! in order 1 to 5 from "most" significant down?

- and of course - "WHY!"

Company..................................................Reason
1 ?
2 ??
3 ???
4 ????
5 ?????


regards

Mark Pilkington

_________________
20th Century - The Age of Manned Flight
"from Wrights to Armstrong in 66 years -WOW!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:06 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:11 pm
Posts: 2671
Location: Port Charlotte, Florida
OK. . . here goes. . .

Numero Uno would have to be Boeing. Why? Their incredibly long line of successful civilian and military aircraft designs is nothing short of amazing. They built some of the world's all-time greatest bombers: B-17, B-29, B-47, B-52. The majority of the world's airline passengers over the last several decades have traveled aboard Boeing products, and that trend continues.

Number Two would be Douglas. Why? Up until their acquisition by Boeing, Douglas / McD-D had an amazing string of successful civilian and military aircraft: the great Douglas Commercial line (DC-2 through DC-9), as well as many of the world's best fighters (F-101, F-4) and attack aircraft (Skyraider, Skyhawk, Whale, etc).

The rest of the Top Five:

North American. From WW2 through the Jet Age, they cranked out some amazing fighters and bombers. . . P-51, B-25, F-86, F-100, et al. And let's not forget cutting-edge research aircraft like the X-15 and XB-70.

Lockheed (including Convair and General Dynamics). Why? Innovations like the P-38, Constellation, F-102, F-104, F-106, C-130, et al.

Bell Helicopter. Why? They are the world's leading whirlybird maker.

I have my Nomex suit on. . . flame away! :crispy:

Dean the daring 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:57 pm
Posts: 140
Location: I was a young troubadour when I rode in on a song, and I'll be an old troubadour when I'm gone.
As far as volume, Cessna has to be top dog, no?


And to Dean up above... how could you mention Lockheed and not make special note of the SR-71? Image :D :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:35 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Boeing-same as above, long line of bombers and airliners changed the world.

Douglas- the DC-3 that is all that needs said

Piper- Is there anyone that has never flown in a Cub?

Lockheed-the test aircraft and Black Ops aircraft are legends

Grumman-THey have the long line of naval aircraft that won wars and battles.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 12:46 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Mark_Pilkington wrote:
What are the top 5 US manufacturers in terms of number of significant or successful types, volumes of aircraft built, ie the Boeings, North American, Curtiss and Consolidated etc.
To be on my list, you have to be a viable manufacturer in a financial sense. Boeing currently builds a wide range of aircraft from transports to fighters (I won't include the T-45 here). Lockheed Martin builds fighters only and some of the others have become primarily service providers or have moved into other areas of defense. Yet others have become 3rd rate sub-tier supplers to the other airframers and survive in part due to their state's political clout.

I know that my response isn't in the spirit of your question, but many of the companies you have in mind only have history as their legacy and nothing more. Their expertise is long ago dead or retired, their plants closed and torn down, the tribal knowledge and experiences of their best designers long forgotten. They built some great planes in their day, but what have they done for us lately? If you can't leverage that rich history into something useful now, it must not have been as good as you thought, i.e. kept up with the times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:54 am
Posts: 82
Location: San Jose, CA
I was gonna mention Grumman for putting us on the moon, but looked back at the OP and it said "aircraft" so.... I guess not.

I'll say Boeing and Douglas for being the backbone of the bomber and transport sectors for such a long time, Lockheed for all the whizbang stuff, and Cessna/Piper each for respectively teaching entire generations how to fly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:17 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 am
Posts: 1179
Location: Merchantville, NJ
mustangdriver wrote:

Piper- Is there anyone that has never flown in a Cub?



Me! But I am willing to burst that cherry if someone in the NE has a Piper Cub they wish to let me fly in! (Weight/balance note- I am about 225 lbs)

Robbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:31 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Australia
Quote:
I know that my response isn't in the spirit of your question, but many of the companies you have in mind only have history as their legacy and nothing more


I realise many of the "great" companies no longer commercially exist, and so may be considered "unsuccessful" from that outcome, but my question was aimed at their historical design/engineering and production achievements rather than their long term commercial success.

regards

Mark Pilkington

_________________
20th Century - The Age of Manned Flight
"from Wrights to Armstrong in 66 years -WOW!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:54 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Mark,

If your criteria is a current U.S. manufacturer who builds comercial and military fighters, then the top five spots need to go to Boeing because no one else in the world, except EADS builds a full spectrum of airframe types, the rest who still manufacture build either transport/cargo or helicopters or military fighters and either donot currently, or have in the recent past (1975-present) built more than one category of airframe.

Care to rephrase and resubmit your quiz?
I'll go with K5dh and Mustangdrivers picks

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 2:55 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
bdk wrote:
Lockheed Martin builds fighters...


Might want to double check that dossier there on Lockheed.

They also build helicopters (US101), transports (C-130J & C-27J), and are one half of the United Launch Alliance (with Boeing) building the Atlas V EELV for both military and commercial use. They are also responsible for much of the continuing airworthiness of the P-3 Orion, legacy C-130s, and the massive C-5M avionics and engine upgrade program.

As for my top 5, I think it has to go as such -

1) Boeing - Oldest and most diverse aerospace company in the world
2) Lockheed - Second oldest and diverse aerospace company in the world
3) Grumman (including Gulfstream) - Builder of many fine products with a long history in both military and civilian production
4) Cessna - Largest manufacturer of light aircraft in history
5) Sikorsky - Oldest helicopter company. Built many different helicopters for many different roles and almost always came out with a winner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:35 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
politics, back scratching, & pork.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 8:00 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Australia
perhaps just to clarify, my intention was to compare the historically most significant US aviation companies, regardless if they are still existing or no longer commercially operating.

regards

Mark Pilkington

_________________
20th Century - The Age of Manned Flight
"from Wrights to Armstrong in 66 years -WOW!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 8:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:15 pm
Posts: 951
1 Monogram

2 Revell

3 Airfix

4 ITC

5 Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:10 pm
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, TEXAS
:lol:
That last was just downright funny.

What, the F-16 doesn't get included in the Lockheed/General Dynamics?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 11:00 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
i'm sorry, i didn't mean to poop on your thread. boeing rates at the top in my opinion for sheer quantity of birds cranked out over the decades.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group