Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 3:59 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:26 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
Is it just me or does a lot of the photos from the Pacific war seem more grainy then those taken in Europe? Is it just me or is there a reasoning for it? :?:

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 8:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:36 pm
Posts: 496
Location: "Fly Over Country" St. Louis, Missouri
Think about the difference in conditions in which the photos were processed. The ETO generally had fixed assets back at base that stayed put for the duration of the war whereas the PTO was island to island. MTO was much the same as the PTO. Weather too (heat and humidity) played a role as well. I would also think that delivery of the raw materials would have been a longer and more difficult process to the PTO than to the ETO.

HTH! Mark


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 11:03 am
Posts: 357
Location: Tulsa, OK.
Nathan, Mark..

forwarded your question to my very good friend Jack Heyn. Jack served a photographer, first in the 13th Sq. and later in the Hdq. Photo Section of the 3rd Attack Group ( Grim Reapers) . Here's his response:



"Perish the thought that I should masquerade as an expert, but I'll give you an opinion. To start with graininess starts with the film; the slower the film the finer the grain; the faster the film the grainier. That is why we always used 100 speed film for portraits and weddings, and even most commercial work. For sports you needed the faster, 400 speed film and graininess wasn't that important.

Now the film used in the ETO, MTO and the PTO was all the same. So as far as graininess in film is concerned it would make no difference. Now the conditions in which the film was processed was vastly different. The two years we spent in New Guinea, we had atrocious conditions. Recommended temps for developing film is 68degrees F. Our temps were seldom under 90 degrees F. Before we could run a roll of film thru the developer we had to run it thru an alum bath first to harden the emulsion. Other wise the emulsion would have flowed off the backing. We never gave it any thought, but it's entirely possible that alum bath could have effected the grain qualities of the film.

Bill, you will notice I have sent a copy of this to Fred Hill. He was a Photographer with the 71st Recon Gp., and spent a couple months with us at Doba Dura in '43 when they first came over, until his outfit got set up. At 88 he has a Photography business going and spends a lot of time in the dark room. You might even get an opinion from him, altho he doesn't check his Emails every day like we do.

Jack


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group