Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 10:51 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: T-34C
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:37 pm
Posts: 151
Location: Aurora, CO
Just wondering when or if the T-34C will be sold to the Civilian market. If so would they be sold in lots? What do think an average price would be? Just dreaming out loud.

Warren


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:31 pm 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
IS that because the Charlie is such a huge threat to our nation in the wrong hands? :roll:

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: T-34C
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 7:23 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Col. Rohr wrote:
The prototype was accidental sold some time back but the US Navy as stated that the Charlie will never be offered to Civilian Market.

This also means if you try to go overseas and buy a surplus Charlie from any Countrys that are using them the FAA will not give you a Airworthy Certific.
Rob, help me out here! I know you can't import an American weapon given as part of an MAP or Lend/Lease program without State Department authorization, but how or why would the FAA stop you from licensing any subsonic aircraft in the Experimental-Exhibition category?

Once inside the US, I wouldn't think you would have any more trouble licensing a T-34C than you would an L-29.

For the record:

http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/nnumSQL.asp?NNumbertxt=190AC
http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/nnumSQL.asp?NNumbertxt=40225
http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/nnumsql.asp?NNumbertxt=4020P
http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/nnumsql.asp?NNumbertxt=4021A

And of course one owned by NASA and 3 by Raytheon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: t-34
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:43 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
the t-34 is a tsa nightmare lately!! to epidemic proportions!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:47 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
Quote:
This also means if you try to go overseas and buy a surplus Charlie from any Countrys that are using them the FAA will not give you a Airworthy Certific.


Unless you chnge out the data plate, or convert to parts and rebuild it to a different model..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 3:34 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
You're saying a T-34C wing and fuselage are different?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 3:54 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
I don't think you can tell unless you open the thing up.

Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 4:06 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
If you say so, I'd have to see one myself. However it's very hard to tell a Harvard from a T-6. You have to know what you're looking for..
Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 8:11 pm
Posts: 41
Location: west coast of US
A C has a wider canopy so there is a joggle at the base of the windscreen to compensate for it. Also the aileron has 4 hinge points instead of 3. I heard they lost an aileron on the prototype C then beefed it up a bit.
If you call the FAA right now and say you want to have them look at your T-34 they would probably say "WRONG # this is for chinese take out" and hang up. That T-34 situation is a mess and I dont think it will get better for some time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:05 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
Quote:
If you call the FAA right now and say you want to have them look at your T-34 they would probably say "WRONG # this is for chinese take out" and hang up. That T-34 situation is a mess and I dont think it will get better for some time.


Hey that's an easy way out. Ha Ha Ha hA :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:20 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
The wing is not the same on the T-34C. They have different wing tips, and it's more slender.

The tail is taller and there are LERX on the stab.

Plus there's a PT-6A up in the nose.

:wink:

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: T34C
PostPosted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:23 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 2:14 pm
Posts: 2370
Location: Atlanta, GA
We maintained T-34C1 s/n: GM89 for several years. This aircraft carried a Standard Airworthiness Certificate, & was very different from the A/B models in many ways. Unfortunately the aircraft was lost along with its owner & a friend of his in a fuel starvation accident Aug 1, 1995 in route to Oshkosh. This aircraft had been a Beech demonstrator/test aircraft, & had to go through, as I remember some special certification process before being sold outside the company. It was a really neat aircraft, & was not bad to work on.
Regards
Robbie Stuart

_________________
Fly Fast Make Noise!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 12:47 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2148
Location: Utah
somewhat related question - so if the T-34C is not allowed at all - Why then can you buy a Pilatus PC-9 if you have the 2.7M? (Check the Courtesy aircraft site)

This is the same plane as the AF is using and that the Navy is replacing the T-34C with.

Maybe because it is not a domestic plane? Just wondering.

Tom P


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group