Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Dec 18, 2025 11:59 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Lost Squadron aircraft
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 10:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:50 am
Posts: 97
Location: Toronto, Ontario
About the Operation Bolo aircraft buried in ice, was Glacier Girl the only P-38 worth salvaging? I realize the B-17s were pretty much trashed but what about the other 4-5 P-38s down there?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 11:05 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
I am aware of one group (who's name I forget) that is, or was, planning a trip to look into a recovery of one of the other P-38s. However, I believe that Glacier Girl was picked because it was supposedly the best one of the bunch that landed there, based on pictures from when the crews were rescued. Anything else under the ice would be in worse shape than G.G. was, if you can imagine that.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Northern VA, USA
retroaviation wrote:
However, I believe that Glacier Girl was picked because it was supposedly the best one of the bunch that landed there, based on pictures from when the crews were rescued. Anything else under the ice would be in worse shape than G.G. was, if you can imagine that.

Gary


IIRC, Glacier Girl was selected because she was the only P-38 where the pilot cut the engines and feathered the props before bellying in. So they figured she had the best props (two of six blades were bent) and engines.

I read an article where Bob Cardin said that literally every part of the plane still needed to be fixed ...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 3:15 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
Actually, that info I had was from when Bob Cardin came to Midland to speak about the G.G. recovery. I could, however, have some of my facts mixed up. My mind ain't right anymore and the ol' memory has taken a beating. :? :oops:

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 4:42 pm 
How did they evaulate the air craft 300' under the ice ??
I thought they were just happy to find one.

Steve


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 667
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Bil Thuma, one of the geophysicists on the project, gave a talk to our assoctiation a little while back. He was saying something about a group from Germany (?) wanting to recover one or more of the other P-38s.

He also said that because of global warming the planes are a lot closer to the coast and not as deep, making recovery easier.

if we wait long enough, maybe we can just sit at the coast with a net and catch them as they fall out...

:partyman:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 5:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Northern VA, USA
rcaf_100 wrote:
He also said that because of global warming the planes are a lot closer to the coast and not as deep, making recovery easier.

if we wait long enough, maybe we can just sit at the coast with a net and catch them as they fall out...

:partyman:


I've used that argument on some of my friends who are a bit over-the-top when it comes to global warming. It tends to annoy them a bit ;)

The downside is the possibility that the moving ice is now tearing the P-38s apart, as it did the more-fragile B-17s.

GG cost about $10 mil to recover and restore. Not sure what the cost would be today, but would imagine it being higher. Probably more cost-effective to dismantle (TEMPORARILY!) GG and reverse-engineer all her parts for tooling and masters so that new-build P-38s can be created.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:41 pm
Posts: 692
Location: Palm Coast, Florida
Forgive the link, but the "Operation Bolero" is looking to recover more of the aircraft. Here's the link:
http://www.operationbolero.org/
Please dont hate me too much for posting a link, :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 30, 2009 8:33 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4528
Location: Dallas, TX
Garth wrote:
GG cost about $10 mil to recover and restore. Not sure what the cost would be today, but would imagine it being higher. Probably more cost-effective to dismantle (TEMPORARILY!) GG and reverse-engineer all her parts for tooling and masters so that new-build P-38s can be created.


Ah, but you'd still have to go down into the ice to get the all-important dataplates. After all, if you can get a dataplate and a few scraps, then you've got yourself an airplane, right? :roll:
On the flip side, there are precious few enough spares for GG as it is (think radiators, etc...) and the addition of one or two more, plus lost time to take it apart and put it back together would serve the double whammy of making it less rare, and preventing it from flying (for a while) and (hopefully) making money on the airshow circuit to keep it airworthy.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 7:22 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
Does anyone know how many parts were recovered from the B-17, those alome would have been worth some dollars with regard to these parts being authentic

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 8:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Northern VA, USA
gary1954 wrote:
Does anyone know how many parts were recovered from the B-17, those alome would have been worth some dollars with regard to these parts being authentic


None, I believe.

They drilled some test holes to locate them, pull up some slivers of metal and determine that they were crushed like soda cans.

The pieces probably in the "best" shape for all the aircraft would be the engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:32 pm
Posts: 791
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
b-17 "big stoop" was located and tunneled to. the aircraft was completely crushed but some smaller parts were taken along with the top fwd turret. Don brooks of Liberty foundation was going to get that aircraft, but after the expedition focused on other potential projects. his C-47 N99FS also made the whole thing possible.

_________________
All I did was press this red button here...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:29 am
Posts: 15
Location: Germany
The other group from can be found here:

http://www.lost-squadron.org

Looks like they still collect money for the recovery...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 8:37 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
The B17 boys at Pima restored the top turret. There was a decision to be made as to wether it would be installed in the Pima B17 or left on display on its cradle.

Don't know which way they decided to to go.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2009 8:44 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Rick do you mean in the B-17 "Ill Be Around"? At least from the outside it has a top turret, not sure if that is a real one or not, or if it is that one or not.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Director


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 82 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group