Got my chores done early today and decided to veg out in front of the current NCIS marathon on the USA channel. Episode 5 from November 2003 came on. It was called "High Seas" and the NCIS team goes on board the carrier "Enterprise" (at least that's what they said it was supposed to be) to investigate an apparent drug overdose by a member of the deck gang.
OK, so it was bad enough that the little details started jumping out at me - like when they say it's the Enterprise (CVN-65) but the film library stock footage they use shows two other carriers with big numbers 70 and 74 clearly visible - that'd be the USS Carl Vinson and the USS John C. Stennis - not the USS Enterprise. I mean, how hard is it to find stock film footage of the ship you named in the script...or conversely, just use the name of the ship in the stock footage you use. Would it have really mattered to the plot of the story if they had said they were going out to the "Chucky V"?
The thing that really jumped out and bashed me over the head though was the scene where Gibbs (Mark Harmon) is questioning the last member of the deck gang who hasn't collapsed as a result of the drug use. They guy is working out with some free weights on the hangar deck and in the background are two Grumman E-2C Hawkeyes and an F-14 Tomcat. On the side of the E-2C behind the crewman, on the rear fuselage where it says NAVY in big black letters, just above that, where it normally shows the unit assignment and/or carrier name (in the case of this NCIS episode, supposedly "USS Enterprise" - see sample illustration below which shows an aircraft from the USS Constellation), the E-2C in this particular scene says "
NAMTRAGRUDET" in large, clear letters - whatever the frak that is! WTF???

There's another, bigger image of the area in question at:
http://www.markstyling.com/E-2_JPEGs/02cu.jpg but I didn't want to overwhelm this post.
On the other hand, Sasha Alexander was so much better in NCIS than she is in Rizzoli & Isles (the same goes for the shows too for that matter.) IMHO.