Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:55 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: PT-26 vs. L-3 Questions
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:10 pm
Posts: 1073
Location: San Marcos, TX
People in the wing are talking about trying to get something that low-time pilots can fly and build some tail-dragger time in. Two planes that are being looked at are a PT-26 and L-3.

Anyone know the fuel burn for each? Other operating costs?

Anyone want to express a preference of one over the other and your reason(s) for the choice?

Myself, I am leaning toward the PT-26, given the number of South Beach challenged members we have!

_________________
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:35 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Johnson City, TN
Don't know about the 26, but the L-3 is going to burn about 4 gph and be considerably cheaper to operate and maintain. It will also be flown more often in the winter.

Steve G


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 10:21 pm
Posts: 1329
Location: Dallas TX
IMHO The L-3 is better for low time pilots with little to no Taildragger time. It is stable and forgiving. The PT series have some bad tendencies if you get them in nasty situations i.e. stall spin characteristics. Also, an L-3 would be much more economical: 3-5gph, 20-40k purchase price in comparison with a PT that can be upwards of 70k. Now, if your pilots want to fly T-6 and above, a PT-26 might very well be worth the price. It would train them for the heavier taildraggers more so than an L-3. Hope that helps.

_________________
Taylor Stevenson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:11 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4527
Location: Dallas, TX
I would consider that the South Beach challenge is significant - and would definitely suggest the PT, assuming the wing can afford either one. On the other hand, you could look at this as a "recruiting" opportunity to get some more young folks involved. If you want to look at an L-3, you ought to send some of the guys down to Cannon. We're in the process of restoring one right now.

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 12:36 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Hey Cuz unless you are training midgets to fly you better get the 26. The L-3 makes a pretty good one place airplane and thats about it. The 26 is simple, easy to fly, has flaps, so should make a pretty good tail dragger trainer. Of course if you want to train guys to fly the T-6, get a Mustang. When they get proficient in the Mustang they are just about ready for the 6.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 269 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group