Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:04 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: B-26 Marauder Picture
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:59 am
Posts: 117
Location: Frederick, OK
Recently picked up this official photograph of B-26C-25-MO 41-35319 taken at Frederick Army Air Field, OK in July of 1945.

Image

Regards,

Andy

_________________
WWII Airborne Demonstration Team
www.WWIIADT.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:25 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:27 am
Posts: 1531
Location: Serbia
Very good image :) Please tell me what the nose code mean?

Cheers ;)

_________________
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: http://www.sreckobradic.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLetLet ... 8234397758


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:23 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Those are codes used by Stateside training establishments, Mgawa. There is a lot of variety of codes that a few of us have been working on "decoding" over the years, often without much success.

I wonder why that airplane ended up way out there so far from the apron? Surely not just for a portrait!

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:31 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The only thing Baughers site shows is it was sent to Altus on 12/5/45. Any idea of it's combat record? 'cause it sure must have suffered @ the hands of students to be that bedraggled looking from just training. So this photo would have been taken about 5 months before it went to the smelters.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:59 am
Posts: 117
Location: Frederick, OK
Good question! The Aviation Archeology accident database show the aircraft being involved in a takeoff accident the day the picture was taken, so that explains the pictures of a well worn trainer sitting out in the grass! Database also shows another accident involving this aircraft at Great Bends, KS in August of 1943.

Regards,

Andy

Second Air Force wrote:
I wonder why that airplane ended up way out there so far from the apron? Surely not just for a portrait!

Scott

_________________
WWII Airborne Demonstration Team
www.WWIIADT.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:41 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:27 am
Posts: 1531
Location: Serbia
Thank you :)

_________________
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: http://www.sreckobradic.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLetLet ... 8234397758


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
coastdef wrote:
Good question! The Aviation Archeology accident database show the aircraft being involved in a takeoff accident the day the picture was taken, so that explains the pictures of a well worn trainer sitting out in the grass! Database also shows another accident involving this aircraft at Great Bends, KS in August of 1943.



Yep, that makes good sense. It might just be accumulated nastiness, but the right nacelle appears to be pretty oiled-down--maybe they lost the engine and aborted early, ending up in the photo pose........

Thanks for sharing that view of the field.
Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 9:54 pm
Posts: 722
Location: Tucson, AZ
I wonder why the photo lists two Marauders but only shows one? And how do we know which one this is?
bill word


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:43 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
definetely looks war weary!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:59 am
Posts: 117
Location: Frederick, OK
On the original print (and the full resolution scan I made), you can read the tail number :D . Don't know about the other one, this was just a single photo I picked up with some other ephemera from Frederick AAF on ebay.

Andy

bilwor wrote:
I wonder why the photo lists two Marauders but only shows one? And how do we know which one this is?
bill word

_________________
WWII Airborne Demonstration Team
www.WWIIADT.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:59 am
Posts: 117
Location: Frederick, OK
Just looked at the accident database for the other serial number listed; it shows an accident with on the same day as a parked aircraft (not pilot listed). I think the accident report is going to be required to figure this one out; the ramp is on the opposite side of the runway from where the aircraft in the picture ended up...


bilwor wrote:
I wonder why the photo lists two Marauders but only shows one? And how do we know which one this is?
bill word

_________________
WWII Airborne Demonstration Team
www.WWIIADT.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 605
Location: West Hammond, Illinois, USA
It was a non-fatal take-off accident. B-26C # 41-35319 collided with the parked B-26C # 41-35773 after aborting the take-off.
Dont have the full report here in front of me, but that what the code on AAIR tells me. It is a non fatal minor accident.

TonyM.

_________________
.
.
.

"Welcome back Mr. Lasky."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:17 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Using the information that Tony posted, it might be possible that aircraft were being stored/parked on the crosswind taxiway out on the southeast side of the field, hence the location where the photo was taken. I will defer to Andy as to whether Frederick followed this practice. It was not uncommon at the 2AF Heavy and Very Heavy Phase stations to park excess aircraft on the least used taxiways and even on crosswind runways from time-to-time.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
I took the liberty of enlarging the photo a bit and have a new theory:

It looks like the airplane in the photo was taking off from the north/south runway heading south. There are wheel tracks that seem to indicate this. Since the north/south runway parallels the apron, maybe the crew ended up off the runway to the apron side (that's probably when they had the run-in with the other machine) and then aborted and ended up here, facing southeast. I'd originally thought the airplane was sitting further east than it is.

Regardless, that's a nice photo of the Sub-Depot hangar and you can just make out the machine shop also.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 254 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group